You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@netbeans.apache.org by Michael Bien <mb...@gmail.com> on 2022/09/23 07:20:32 UTC
Re: running CI jobs based on PR labels
should we proceed with this?
most important points:
- labeling PRs will be important, if you don't label anything: only
~3h of tests/builds will run
- labels are picked up before every CI run (changing labels and
syncing is fine)
- label your PR before pressing the create PR button, otherwise the
first run is wasted
- reviewers should check if sufficient testing was done before
merging, esp if its from new contributors
why all the effort?
- it should use far less resources in average
- more jobs on gh actions means we get better error reports if
something fails etc
- less travis
-> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/4431
regards,
-mbien
On 10.08.22 19:22, Michael Bien wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> while migrating some jobs from travis to github CI, I started making
> some (time consuming) jobs and/or build steps conditional based on PR
> labels.
>
> I keep it here short since most of the info is in the PR text, but as
> example:
>
> The new test job called "Build Tools" would only run if the PR is
> labeled with Ant, Gradle, Maven or MX.
>
> There are also additional command labels available, ci:all-tests would
> enable everything, while ci:no-build would as you would guess disable
> everything (e.g if all what the PR does is to edit a readme or
> sync-PRs which syncs two branches could use this too, since they build
> everything twice right now).
>
> This is just about PRs, the merge will always test everything on master.
>
>
> Why labels and not path based dependency checks? Because they never
> work outside of fairly trivial cases in my experience. They either
> test too much or not enough and whats worse: the dev has to second
> guess if the right things are actually being tested - if they aren't
> there must be also a second mechanism to override the automation.
>
> With labels, reviewers can decide what needs to be tested based on
> experience. A correctly labeled PR should "just work" most of the time
> even if you wouldn't know about the details. However, everyone still
> has to know about it: If you want the right things to be tested, you
> have to label the PR _before_ pressing the create button, otherwise
> the first run will have the wrong settings. (syncs will pick up new
> labels)
>
> I was considering to fail the build for PRs without labels (not
> implemented).
>
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/4431
>
> feedback appreciated,
>
> michael
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists