You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Gary D. Gregory (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/07/03 11:04:00 UTC

[jira] [Deleted] (LANG-1647) Add and ExceptionUtils.isChecked() and isUnchecked()

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gary D. Gregory deleted LANG-1647:
----------------------------------


> Add and ExceptionUtils.isChecked() and isUnchecked()
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-1647
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1647
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Arturo Bernal
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 3.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The idea it's have a function that check if a given throwable is a checked exception. There are some similar function in ConcurrentUtils, but have package visibility and return the same exception. 
> Seem logic have this verification in the class that have this responsibility - ExceptionUtils



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Re: [jira] [Deleted] (LANG-1647) Add and ExceptionUtils.isChecked() and isUnchecked()

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, but that does not answer my question as to why the ticket was
deleted rather than just being closed (e.g. as a duplicate)?

A closed ticket does not involve any work, otherwise why don't we
delete all closed tickets?

Whereas a deleted ticket that is referred to in various place does
cause extra work.
It has certainly caused me problems trying to follow the commits.

Sebb

On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 18:02, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Because it doubles up the work form the original ticket. We do not need a
> second ticket to track the same new feature IMO.
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2023, 12:57 sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Why did you delete this ticket?
> >
> > It is referred to in various emails and commit messages, so it is
> > confusing that the ticket does not exist.
> >
> > I think only tickets which are spam should be deleted.
> >
> > Sebb
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 12:04, Gary D. Gregory (Jira) <ji...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >      [
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
> > ]
> > >
> > > Gary D. Gregory deleted LANG-1647:
> > > ----------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > > Add and ExceptionUtils.isChecked() and isUnchecked()
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >                 Key: LANG-1647
> > > >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1647
> > > >             Project: Commons Lang
> > > >          Issue Type: Improvement
> > > >            Reporter: Arturo Bernal
> > > >            Priority: Minor
> > > >          Time Spent: 3.5h
> > > >  Remaining Estimate: 0h
> > > >
> > > > The idea it's have a function that check if a given throwable is a
> > checked exception. There are some similar function in ConcurrentUtils, but
> > have package visibility and return the same exception.
> > > > Seem logic have this verification in the class that have this
> > responsibility - ExceptionUtils
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> > > (v8.20.10#820010)
> >

Re: [jira] [Deleted] (LANG-1647) Add and ExceptionUtils.isChecked() and isUnchecked()

Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
Because it doubles up the work form the original ticket. We do not need a
second ticket to track the same new feature IMO.

Gary

On Tue, Jul 4, 2023, 12:57 sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why did you delete this ticket?
>
> It is referred to in various emails and commit messages, so it is
> confusing that the ticket does not exist.
>
> I think only tickets which are spam should be deleted.
>
> Sebb
>
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 12:04, Gary D. Gregory (Jira) <ji...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >      [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
> ]
> >
> > Gary D. Gregory deleted LANG-1647:
> > ----------------------------------
> >
> >
> > > Add and ExceptionUtils.isChecked() and isUnchecked()
> > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >                 Key: LANG-1647
> > >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1647
> > >             Project: Commons Lang
> > >          Issue Type: Improvement
> > >            Reporter: Arturo Bernal
> > >            Priority: Minor
> > >          Time Spent: 3.5h
> > >  Remaining Estimate: 0h
> > >
> > > The idea it's have a function that check if a given throwable is a
> checked exception. There are some similar function in ConcurrentUtils, but
> have package visibility and return the same exception.
> > > Seem logic have this verification in the class that have this
> responsibility - ExceptionUtils
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> > (v8.20.10#820010)
>

Re: [jira] [Deleted] (LANG-1647) Add and ExceptionUtils.isChecked() and isUnchecked()

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Why did you delete this ticket?

It is referred to in various emails and commit messages, so it is
confusing that the ticket does not exist.

I think only tickets which are spam should be deleted.

Sebb

On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 12:04, Gary D. Gregory (Jira) <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>      [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
>
> Gary D. Gregory deleted LANG-1647:
> ----------------------------------
>
>
> > Add and ExceptionUtils.isChecked() and isUnchecked()
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: LANG-1647
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1647
> >             Project: Commons Lang
> >          Issue Type: Improvement
> >            Reporter: Arturo Bernal
> >            Priority: Minor
> >          Time Spent: 3.5h
> >  Remaining Estimate: 0h
> >
> > The idea it's have a function that check if a given throwable is a checked exception. There are some similar function in ConcurrentUtils, but have package visibility and return the same exception.
> > Seem logic have this verification in the class that have this responsibility - ExceptionUtils
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> (v8.20.10#820010)