Re: continuation woes

[Adam Walsh <aw...@contal.net.au>]

Jorg Heymans wrote:

>
> Adam Walsh wrote:
>
>> Hi Jorg,
>>
>> That scenario makes perfect sense. In step 1, you're actually 
>> updating the model of your form by removing the element. Step 2 
>> you're jumping back and seeing an old view of your form model that is 
>> no longer valid. In step 4 you're effectively just refreshing your 
>> view on the model, so it won't show the element that you removed 
>> previously. It's not actually being removed again, it's presenting 
>> the updated repeater widget with the element missing that you removed 
>> in step 1.
>
> this makes sense .
>
> But why can't I reproduce this behaviour in the CForms samples then? 
> Try playing with the contact repeater at the bottom, it does not have 
> this "feature".
> http://localhost:8888/samples/blocks/forms/form1


Hmm, good question. There goes my theory I guess :-)



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org