Re: Prior to apr 2.0 / httpd 2.4...

["William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

On 3/21/2011 3:20 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> 
> If I were to substitute libxml2 and demonstrate an expat-free version
> of APR and HTTPD, would there be support for that?  I'm thinking
> the choice of native XML parser could become a compile-time or 
> even a run-time choice.  I'd expect a quick&dirty prototype demo
> to be just a couple of hours work.

Absolutely; this seems like a topic for the apr list.  It might alleviate
any 'necessity' to start bundling the xml parser again , if either-or could
be trivially consumed.