You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ozone.apache.org by "Sammi Chen (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/07/20 09:59:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-3878) Make OMHA serviceID optional if one
(but only one) is defined in the config
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17161093#comment-17161093 ]
Sammi Chen commented on HDDS-3878:
----------------------------------
Hi [~elek], I 'm a little confused about the relationship between this JIRA and HDDS-3413. Will HDDS-3413 become "not a problem" once this JIRA is resolved? If it's the case, should I include this JIRA in 0.6.0 too?
> Make OMHA serviceID optional if one (but only one) is defined in the config
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-3878
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3878
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Marton Elek
> Assignee: Marton Elek
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> om.serviceId is required on case of OM.HA in all the client parameters even if there is only one om.serviceId and it can be chosen.
> My goal is:
> 1. Provide better usability
> 2. Simplify the documentation task ;-)
> With using the om.serviceId from the config if
> 1. config is available
> 2. om ha is configured
> 3. only one service is configured
> It also makes easier to run the same tests with/without HA
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ozone-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ozone-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org