Tapestry vs JavaServer Faces

[Winston Huang <we...@mail.com>]

Hi all,

I am considering to use Tapestry as our new UI
framework. I love the reusable component based development approach.
However I also noticed the new technology from Sun - JavaServer
Faces. Could anyone kindly give me a comparison between these two,
pros and cons? It's greatly appreciated.

Winston
-- 
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: Tapestry vs JavaServer Faces

[Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>]

On Jun 24, 2004, at 8:43 AM, Winston Huang wrote:
> I am considering to use Tapestry as our new UI
> framework. I love the reusable component based development approach.
> However I also noticed the new technology from Sun - JavaServer
> Faces. Could anyone kindly give me a comparison between these two,
> pros and cons? It's greatly appreciated.

I would use JSF in its current form on the same applications where I'd 
use EJB 1.0.

To really see the fun JSF provides when using the defacto JSP view 
layer, check this out:

	http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2004/06/09/jsf.html

I certainly hope JSF will mature into something Tapestry/WO-like.  But 
I won't be holding my breath.

	Erik


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org