You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> on 2005/08/09 23:28:55 UTC
Re: Shale Tapestry Integration
Hi Jacob,
I suspect that it might be the license issue - you remember, we discussed
that?
regards,
Martin
On 8/9/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> FYI
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jacob Hookom <ja...@hookom.net>
> Date: Aug 9, 2005 3:07 PM
> Subject: Shale Tapestry Integration
> To: gvanmatre@comcast.net
> Cc: Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>, craigmcc@apache.org
>
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> I'm wondering why Shale doesn't just look at using Facelets instead of
> trying to integrate a parser from a completely different framework? It
> is already JSF-centric with more templating features than Tapestry. On
> top of that, Facelets uses the new EL API to properly handle EL variable
> management-- better than the next version of JSP (2.1) for tree creation.
>
> Home Page:
> https://facelets.dev.java.net/
>
> Documentation:
> https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/docbook.html
>
> Sample Error Page:
> https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/error.html
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jacob
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
Re: Shale Tapestry Integration
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Well,
you might be right that the license is compatible - I was assuming that not,
but after reading through, it seems to be possible. I am not good enough in
English to really find the subtle differences, though.
Maybe we should go ask our experts here at the ASF about this particular
issue?
regards,
Martin
On 8/10/05, Jacob Hookom <ja...@hookom.net> wrote:
>
> Yes I remember, what licensing were you looking for Facelets? If you've
> been following the licensing threads related to CDDL, the issue isn't
> CDDL, it's Sun's contribution and copyright assignment-- which Facelets
> is NOT under.
>
> Is there something in particular that you are looking for from the
> license?
>
> -- Jacob
>
> Martin Marinschek wrote:
>
> > Hi Jacob,
> >
> > I suspect that it might be the license issue - you remember, we
> > discussed that?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 8/9/05, *Matthias Wessendorf* <mwessendorf@gmail.com
> > <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > FYI
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Jacob Hookom <jacob@hookom.net <ma...@hookom.net>>
> > Date: Aug 9, 2005 3:07 PM
> > Subject: Shale Tapestry Integration
> > To: gvanmatre@comcast.net <ma...@comcast.net>
> > Cc: Matthias Wessendorf <mwessendorf@gmail.com
> > <ma...@gmail.com>>, craigmcc@apache.org
> > <ma...@apache.org>
> >
> >
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > I'm wondering why Shale doesn't just look at using Facelets
> > instead of
> > trying to integrate a parser from a completely different
> > framework? It
> > is already JSF-centric with more templating features than
> > Tapestry. On
> > top of that, Facelets uses the new EL API to properly handle EL
> > variable
> > management-- better than the next version of JSP (2.1) for tree
> > creation.
> >
> > Home Page:
> > https://facelets.dev.java.net/
> >
> > Documentation:
> > https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/docbook.html
> >
> > Sample Error Page:
> > https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/error.html
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jacob
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
> --------------------------
> http://hookom.blogspot.com
>
>
Re: Shale Tapestry Integration
Posted by Jacob Hookom <ja...@hookom.net>.
Yes I remember, what licensing were you looking for Facelets? If you've
been following the licensing threads related to CDDL, the issue isn't
CDDL, it's Sun's contribution and copyright assignment-- which Facelets
is NOT under.
Is there something in particular that you are looking for from the license?
-- Jacob
Martin Marinschek wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> I suspect that it might be the license issue - you remember, we
> discussed that?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 8/9/05, *Matthias Wessendorf* <mwessendorf@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> FYI
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jacob Hookom <jacob@hookom.net <ma...@hookom.net>>
> Date: Aug 9, 2005 3:07 PM
> Subject: Shale Tapestry Integration
> To: gvanmatre@comcast.net <ma...@comcast.net>
> Cc: Matthias Wessendorf <mwessendorf@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>>, craigmcc@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>
>
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> I'm wondering why Shale doesn't just look at using Facelets
> instead of
> trying to integrate a parser from a completely different
> framework? It
> is already JSF-centric with more templating features than
> Tapestry. On
> top of that, Facelets uses the new EL API to properly handle EL
> variable
> management-- better than the next version of JSP (2.1) for tree
> creation.
>
> Home Page:
> https://facelets.dev.java.net/
>
> Documentation:
> https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/docbook.html
>
> Sample Error Page:
> https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/error.html
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jacob
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
>
--
Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
--------------------------
http://hookom.blogspot.com