You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com> on 2013/05/24 19:41:44 UTC
[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)
Hi All,
I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
Commit: 873c1972c7bbe337cee2000a09451d14ebbcb728
List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.1
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1.0/
PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
Testing instructions are here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 01:43:33PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The developer community has started our third round of voting on
> 4.1.0. We welcome any users that want to test the proposed release
> artifacts to test! Keep in mind that this is *not* a release
> announcement yet, and is only an indication that we have started
> another round of voting.
>
> Thanks!
FYI - This vote was cancelled, due to 2 DEB packaging bugs that needed
to be addressed. We are re-spinning another RC for voting shortly.
Fwd: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
Hi all,
The developer community has started our third round of voting on
4.1.0. We welcome any users that want to test the proposed release
artifacts to test! Keep in mind that this is *not* a release
announcement yet, and is only an indication that we have started
another round of voting.
Thanks!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>
Date: Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:41 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Hi All,
I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
Commit: 873c1972c7bbe337cee2000a09451d14ebbcb728
List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.1
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1.0/
PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
Testing instructions are here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 12:00:19PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to vote -1 on this one.
>
> It's my bad, but it seems that I made a mistake on the Debian
> packaging side. See this commit: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=dc822a83d77830281402175b4a57b25b7e3b180a
>
> I just verified, cloudstack-setup-agent has variables in it like
> @AGENTSYSCONFDIR@ which would render the tool useless.
>
> I see this commit is already in the 4.1 branch, but it isn't in the
> commit you are voting on (873c19).
>
> I also found a problem with the AWSAPI package, which is in master
> in commit 28f7a216d8bf4da29a45cb76e5c28ee568ae1984
>
> I already cherry-picked that one to 4.1 since it's only touching
> packaging and not code.
>
> Other then the packaging I'm happy with this code. I obviously
> wasn't able to do a full QA on my own, but the tests I've done all
> work, which include:
> * Deploying instances
> * Adding RBD storage
> * Attaching RBD volumes
>
> With the packaging resolved I'd vote +1, but for now it's -1 (binding).
>
> Wido
I got myself to my laptop. I see that these corrections are in 4.1 now.
I'll respin a release candidate right now.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
Ok. Vote cancelled.
Wido, is the 4.1 branch corrected now? I'll be back near my laptop
tonight. Just want to know if there is work to do, or can I just
re-spin a forth round?
On May 26, 2013, at 6:01 AM, Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl> wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to vote -1 on this one.
>
> It's my bad, but it seems that I made a mistake on the Debian packaging side. See this commit: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=dc822a83d77830281402175b4a57b25b7e3b180a
>
> I just verified, cloudstack-setup-agent has variables in it like @AGENTSYSCONFDIR@ which would render the tool useless.
>
> I see this commit is already in the 4.1 branch, but it isn't in the commit you are voting on (873c19).
>
> I also found a problem with the AWSAPI package, which is in master in commit 28f7a216d8bf4da29a45cb76e5c28ee568ae1984
>
> I already cherry-picked that one to 4.1 since it's only touching packaging and not code.
>
> Other then the packaging I'm happy with this code. I obviously wasn't able to do a full QA on my own, but the tests I've done all work, which include:
> * Deploying instances
> * Adding RBD storage
> * Attaching RBD volumes
>
> With the packaging resolved I'd vote +1, but for now it's -1 (binding).
>
> Wido
>
> On 05/24/2013 07:41 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>> vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
>> Commit: 873c1972c7bbe337cee2000a09451d14ebbcb728
>>
>> List of changes:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.1
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1.0/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Testing instructions are here:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)
Posted by Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>.
Hi Chip,
I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to vote -1 on this one.
It's my bad, but it seems that I made a mistake on the Debian packaging
side. See this commit:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=dc822a83d77830281402175b4a57b25b7e3b180a
I just verified, cloudstack-setup-agent has variables in it like
@AGENTSYSCONFDIR@ which would render the tool useless.
I see this commit is already in the 4.1 branch, but it isn't in the
commit you are voting on (873c19).
I also found a problem with the AWSAPI package, which is in master in
commit 28f7a216d8bf4da29a45cb76e5c28ee568ae1984
I already cherry-picked that one to 4.1 since it's only touching
packaging and not code.
Other then the packaging I'm happy with this code. I obviously wasn't
able to do a full QA on my own, but the tests I've done all work, which
include:
* Deploying instances
* Adding RBD storage
* Attaching RBD volumes
With the packaging resolved I'd vote +1, but for now it's -1 (binding).
Wido
On 05/24/2013 07:41 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
> Commit: 873c1972c7bbe337cee2000a09451d14ebbcb728
>
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.1
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Testing instructions are here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
[VOTE][CANCELLED] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
This vote is cancelled. I'll re-spin a round 4 shortly.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 01:41:44PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
> Commit: 873c1972c7bbe337cee2000a09451d14ebbcb728
>
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.1
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Testing instructions are here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)