You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/02/17 04:08:27 UTC
[jira] Created: (SOLR-1776) dismax should treate schema's default
field as a default qf
dismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf
-----------------------------------------------------------
Key: SOLR-1776
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Hoss Man
the DismaxQParser is completely useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh default value for hte qf param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (SOLR-1776) dismax should treate schema's default
field as a default qf
Posted by "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1776.
----------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
Assignee: Hoss Man
Committed revision 915646.
> dismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1776
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Assignee: Hoss Man
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> the DismaxQParser is completely useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh default value for hte qf param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1776) dismax should treate schema's default
field as a default qf
Posted by "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836171#action_12836171 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1776:
------------------------------------
+1, seems reasonable.
> dismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1776
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Hoss Man
>
> the DismaxQParser is completely useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh default value for hte qf param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1776) dismax and edismax should treate
schema's default field as a default qf
Posted by "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1776:
---------------------------
Description: the DismaxQParser (and ExtendedDismaxQParser) is completely useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh default value for hte qf param. (was: the DismaxQParser is completely useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh default value for hte qf param.)
Summary: dismax and edismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf (was: dismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf)
> dismax and edismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1776
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Assignee: Hoss Man
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> the DismaxQParser (and ExtendedDismaxQParser) is completely useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh default value for hte qf param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.