You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> on 2020/09/04 13:18:34 UTC
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Hi Jim, Don,
Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Let's commit and work after pushed.
We should try
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
again for 4.1.8.
Regards,
Matthias
>
>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>
>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>>>>> There are two categories:
>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>>>> port of 4.1.7.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been
>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>>>
>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <ms...@apache.org>
>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build
>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it
>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this was
>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>>>>> have the changes.
>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>>>
>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>>> all objects get visited
>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>>>
>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>>>
>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>>
>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should
>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be
>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the
>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>> build with Java 8?
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Am 04.09.20 um 18:45 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 4 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>
>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>> We should try
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>
>> again for 4.1.8.
> I've included it in a large bundle of cherry-picks that I've been
> testing.
Thanks!
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org>.
On 4 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Jim, Don,
>
> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>
> We should try
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>
> again for 4.1.8.
I've included it in a large bundle of cherry-picks that I've been
testing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org>.
On 24 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Great!
>
> We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
>
> And update LICENSE:
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e
Now that the big merge is out of the way, I've started working on
testing this for a pull request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org>.
I've got everything on my list for AOO418 in the queue:
* Fix for old java detection when building with new java
Set java compilation target to version 1.5 #101
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/101
* Bug fixes from upstream for bundled libxml2 and serf modules
Libxml+serf 418 #102
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/102
* Upgrade to a newer bundled nss
Nssupgrade - Upgrade bundled nss to nss-3.39-with-nspr-4.20 #100
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/100
The first two have been committed to trunk and AOO42X. The AOO418
changes have been lightly tested on Debian 9, Windows 7, and CentOS 5.
The last pull request has not yet been merged to trunk. The changes
have been tested on Debian 9, Windows 7, and CentOS 7. Upgrades to NSS
have been problematic in the past, especially on MacOS. This module is
used for document signing and signature checking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
++1
> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9
>
> I'd at least like to get the nss update into trunk/AOO42X where it can
> soak for a while.
>
>>> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
>>>>
>>>> 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
>>>>
>>>> Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
>>>>
>>>> So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull request is borked.
>>>>
>>>> Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to include '-std=c++11'
>>>
>>> I missed that the patch to Darwin.mk was rejected when I applied the
>>> pre-update version of the patch. I regenerated nss.patch, so these
>>> issues should be fixed now, or at least should be much better.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org>.
On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9
I'd at least like to get the nss update into trunk/AOO42X where it can
soak for a while.
>> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
>>>
>>> 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
>>>
>>> Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
>>>
>>> So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull request is borked.
>>>
>>> Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to include '-std=c++11'
>>
>> I missed that the patch to Darwin.mk was rejected when I applied the
>> pre-update version of the patch. I regenerated nss.patch, so these
>> issues should be fixed now, or at least should be much better.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9
> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
>>
>> 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
>>
>> Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
>>
>> So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull request is borked.
>>
>> Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to include '-std=c++11'
>
> I missed that the patch to Darwin.mk was rejected when I applied the
> pre-update version of the patch. I regenerated nss.patch, so these
> issues should be fixed now, or at least should be much better.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org>.
On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
>
> 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
>
> Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
>
> So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull request is borked.
>
> Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to include '-std=c++11'
I missed that the patch to Darwin.mk was rejected when I applied the
pre-update version of the patch. I regenerated nss.patch, so these
issues should be fixed now, or at least should be much better.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull request is borked.
Also, we need to force 'g++' on the macOS build to include '-std=c++11'
> On Oct 6, 2020, at 8:30 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>
> I am booting up the macOS VM for the 4.1.8-dev builds as we speak. Will update to head and pull in nss
>
>> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Don Lewis <truckman@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Any progress on nss?
>>
>> On 30 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it until Monday.
>>>
>>>> On Sep 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>>>>>>>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>>>>>>>> to 2.7.18.
>>>>>>> Merged now...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
>>>>>>> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
>>>>>> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
>>>>>> fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?
>>>>
>>>> nss is somewhat risky. We've had problems with upgrading it in the
>>>> past, primarily with MacOS. It does fix a fairly important CVE, though
>>>> I don't know if it potentially affects our usage of nss. I just
>>>> submitted a pull request.
>>>>
>>>> Serf should be fairly quick. It's just a couple of patches
>>>> cherry-picked from upstream to fix a CVE.
>>>>
>>>> There are also a few new libxml2 CVEs, but not a new release of the
>>>> library. They can be fixed with some upstream cherry picks.
>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org> <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>> <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org> <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>>>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org> <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>> <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org><mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org> <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org> <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I am booting up the macOS VM for the 4.1.8-dev builds as we speak. Will update to head and pull in nss
> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Any progress on nss?
>
> On 30 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it until Monday.
>>
>>> On Sep 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>
>>>> Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>>>>>>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>>>>>>> to 2.7.18.
>>>>>> Merged now...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
>>>>>> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
>>>>> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
>>>>> fix.
>>>>
>>>> OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?
>>>
>>> nss is somewhat risky. We've had problems with upgrading it in the
>>> past, primarily with MacOS. It does fix a fairly important CVE, though
>>> I don't know if it potentially affects our usage of nss. I just
>>> submitted a pull request.
>>>
>>> Serf should be fairly quick. It's just a couple of patches
>>> cherry-picked from upstream to fix a CVE.
>>>
>>> There are also a few new libxml2 CVEs, but not a new release of the
>>> library. They can be fixed with some upstream cherry picks.
>>>
>>>> Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org> <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org> <mailto:dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org>.
Any progress on nss?
On 30 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it until Monday.
>
>> On Sep 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Don,
>>>
>>> Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>>>>>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>>>>>> to 2.7.18.
>>>>> Merged now...
>>>>>
>>>>> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
>>>>> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
>>>> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
>>>> fix.
>>>
>>> OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?
>>
>> nss is somewhat risky. We've had problems with upgrading it in the
>> past, primarily with MacOS. It does fix a fairly important CVE, though
>> I don't know if it potentially affects our usage of nss. I just
>> submitted a pull request.
>>
>> Serf should be fairly quick. It's just a couple of patches
>> cherry-picked from upstream to fix a CVE.
>>
>> There are also a few new libxml2 CVEs, but not a new release of the
>> library. They can be fixed with some upstream cherry picks.
>>
>>> Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it until Monday.
> On Sep 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>>>>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>>>>> to 2.7.18.
>>>> Merged now...
>>>>
>>>> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
>>>> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
>>> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
>>> fix.
>>
>> OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?
>
> nss is somewhat risky. We've had problems with upgrading it in the
> past, primarily with MacOS. It does fix a fairly important CVE, though
> I don't know if it potentially affects our usage of nss. I just
> submitted a pull request.
>
> Serf should be fairly quick. It's just a couple of patches
> cherry-picked from upstream to fix a CVE.
>
> There are also a few new libxml2 CVEs, but not a new release of the
> library. They can be fixed with some upstream cherry picks.
>
>> Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org>.
On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>>>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>>>> to 2.7.18.
>>> Merged now...
>>>
>>> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
>>> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
>> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
>> fix.
>
> OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?
nss is somewhat risky. We've had problems with upgrading it in the
past, primarily with MacOS. It does fix a fairly important CVE, though
I don't know if it potentially affects our usage of nss. I just
submitted a pull request.
Serf should be fairly quick. It's just a couple of patches
cherry-picked from upstream to fix a CVE.
There are also a few new libxml2 CVEs, but not a new release of the
library. They can be fixed with some upstream cherry picks.
> Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Don,
Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>>> to 2.7.18.
>> Merged now...
>>
>> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
>> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
> I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
> fix.
OK, if that can be done quick *and* safe?
Otherwise I doubt that we have a release in the next 2 weeks... ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org>.
On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>> to 2.7.18.
>
> Merged now...
>
> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
I've got another nss upgrade in the works as well as a small serf bug
fix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
+1
> On Sep 26, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>> to 2.7.18.
>
> Merged now...
>
> Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
> we are pretty close to a release candidate?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Great!
>>>>
>>>> We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
>>>>
>>>> And update LICENSE:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 24.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... rebuilding
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
>>>>>> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
>>>>>> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
>>>>>> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
>>>>>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>>>>>> ... removing directory /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7h0000gn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718 ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Don, Jim,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>>>>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>>>>>>>>> changes from AOO42X.
>>>>>>>> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
>>>>>>>> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi all,
Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
> to 2.7.18.
Merged now...
Unless Don wants to add something for the Java detection I would think
we are pretty close to a release candidate?
Regards,
Matthias
>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Great!
>>>
>>> We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
>>>
>>> And update LICENSE:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 24.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... rebuilding
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
>>>>> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
>>>>> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
>>>>> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
>>>>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>>>>> ... removing directory /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7h0000gn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718 ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Don, Jim,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>>>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>>>>>>>> changes from AOO42X.
>>>>>>> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
>>>>>>> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
to 2.7.18.
>
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Great!
>>
>> We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
>>
>> And update LICENSE:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>> Am 24.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... rebuilding
>>>
>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
>>>> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
>>>> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
>>>> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
>>>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>>>> ... removing directory /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7h0000gn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718 ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Don, Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>>>>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>>>>>>> changes from AOO42X.
>>>>>> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
>>>>>> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Great!
>
> We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
>
> And update LICENSE:
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>
> Am 24.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... rebuilding
>>
>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>>>
>>> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
>>> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
>>> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
>>> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
>>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>>> ... removing directory /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7h0000gn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718 ...
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Don, Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>>>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>>>>>> changes from AOO42X.
>>>>> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
>>>>> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>>>>>
>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Great!
We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
And update LICENSE:
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e
Regards,
Matthias
Am 24.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... rebuilding
>
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>>
>> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
>> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
>> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
>> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>> ... removing directory /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7h0000gn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718 ...
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>>>
>>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Don, Jim,
>>>>
>>>> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>>>>> changes from AOO42X.
>>>> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
>>>> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>>>>
>>>> Opinions?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... rebuilding
> On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>
> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>
> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
> ... cleaning the output tree ...
> ... removing directory /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7h0000gn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718 ...
>
>
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>>
>>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Don, Jim,
>>>
>>> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>>>> changes from AOO42X.
>>>
>>> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
>>> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>>>
>>> Opinions?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org>.
On 24 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>
> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
> ... cleaning the output tree ...
> ... removing directory /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7h0000gn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718
I don't think there were any changes to serf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
ERROR: The following files could not be found:
ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.0.5.4.dylib
ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib
... cleaning the output tree ...
... removing directory /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7h0000gn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718 ...
> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>
> I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS building further along than before... fingers crossed.
>
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Don, Jim,
>>
>> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>>> changes from AOO42X.
>>
>> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
>> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>>
>> Opinions?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS building further along than before... fingers crossed.
> On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Don, Jim,
>
> Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
>> changes from AOO42X.
>
> If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
> would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Don, Jim,
Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
> changes from AOO42X.
If these changes have too much impact on the macOS build I personally
would prefer to shift them to AOO419.
Opinions?
Regards,
Matthias
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org>.
On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
changes from AOO42X.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
> On Sep 19, 2020, at 5:43 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 15.09.20 um 13:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Hmmm... we still support 10.7 as the lowest macOS version on both truck and AOO420 so somewhere, somehow, that got reverted. So let's go ahead and pull those Issues into AOO418.
> It got reverted here (and in some other commits):
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/63fbc773865edd81abc91dd88f871bf29ce0a1f1 <https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/63fbc773865edd81abc91dd88f871bf29ce0a1f1>
>
> This may also be needed for Don's Pull Request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 <https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>
>>> On Sep 8, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> Am 08.09.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?
>>> I think so:
>>>
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887#c0
>>>
>>> Especially this one from you ;-)
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1805089
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>>> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
>>>>> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
>>>>> wanted you to have a look.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>>>>>>> We should try
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> again for 4.1.8.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>>>>>>>>>>>> There are two categories:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>>>>>>>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>>>>>>>>>>> port of 4.1.7.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been
>>>>>>>>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>>>>>>>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <ms...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build
>>>>>>>>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it
>>>>>>>>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>>>>>>>>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this was
>>>>>>>>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>>>>>>>>>>>> have the changes.
>>>>>>>>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>>>>>>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>>>>>>>>>> all objects get visited
>>>>>>>>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>>>>>>>>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>>>>>>>>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>>>>>>>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should
>>>>>>>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be
>>>>>>>>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the
>>>>>>>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>>>>>>>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>>>>>>>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>>>>>>>>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>>>>>>>>> build with Java 8?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Jim,
Am 15.09.20 um 13:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Hmmm... we still support 10.7 as the lowest macOS version on both truck and AOO420 so somewhere, somehow, that got reverted. So let's go ahead and pull those Issues into AOO418.
It got reverted here (and in some other commits):
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/63fbc773865edd81abc91dd88f871bf29ce0a1f1
This may also be needed for Don's Pull Request:
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94
Regards,
Matthias
>
>> On Sep 8, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 08.09.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?
>> I think so:
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887#c0
>>
>> Especially this one from you ;-)
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1805089
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>>> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
>>>> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
>>>> wanted you to have a look.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>>>>>> We should try
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>>>>>
>>>>>> again for 4.1.8.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>>>>>>>>>>> There are two categories:
>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>>>>>>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>>>>>>>>>> port of 4.1.7.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been
>>>>>>>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>>>>>>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>>>>>>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <ms...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build
>>>>>>>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it
>>>>>>>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>>>>>>>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this was
>>>>>>>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>>>>>>>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>>>>>>>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>>>>>>>>>>> have the changes.
>>>>>>>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>>>>>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>>>>>>>>> all objects get visited
>>>>>>>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>>>>>>>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>>>>>>>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>>>>>>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should
>>>>>>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be
>>>>>>>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the
>>>>>>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>>>>>>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>>>>>>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>>>>>>>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>>>>>>>> build with Java 8?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Hmmm... we still support 10.7 as the lowest macOS version on both truck and AOO420 so somewhere, somehow, that got reverted. So let's go ahead and pull those Issues into AOO418.
> On Sep 8, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 08.09.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?
>
> I think so:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887#c0
>
> Especially this one from you ;-)
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1805089
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>
>>> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
>>> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
>>> wanted you to have a look.
>>>
>>> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>>>>> We should try
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>>>>
>>>>> again for 4.1.8.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>>>>>>>>>> There are two categories:
>>>>>>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>>>>>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>>>>>>>>> port of 4.1.7.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been
>>>>>>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>>>>>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>>>>>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <ms...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build
>>>>>>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it
>>>>>>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>>>>>>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this was
>>>>>>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>>>>>>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>>>>>>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>>>>>>>>>> have the changes.
>>>>>>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>>>>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>>>>>>>> all objects get visited
>>>>>>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>>>>>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>>>>>>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>>>>>>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>>>>>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should
>>>>>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be
>>>>>>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the
>>>>>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>>>>>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>>>>>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>>>>>>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>>>>>>> build with Java 8?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Jim,
Am 08.09.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?
I think so:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887#c0
Especially this one from you ;-)
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1805089
Regards,
Matthias
>
>> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
>> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
>> wanted you to have a look.
>>
>> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>>>
>>>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>>>> We should try
>>>>
>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>>>
>>>> again for 4.1.8.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>>>>>>>>> There are two categories:
>>>>>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>>>>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>>>>>>>> port of 4.1.7.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been
>>>>>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>>>>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>>>>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <ms...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build
>>>>>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it
>>>>>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>>>>>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this was
>>>>>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>>>>>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>>>>>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>>>>>>>>> have the changes.
>>>>>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>>>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>>>>>>> all objects get visited
>>>>>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>>>>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>>>>>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>>>>>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>>>>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should
>>>>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be
>>>>>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the
>>>>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>>>>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>>>>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>>>>>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>>>>>> build with Java 8?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x?
> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
>
> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
> wanted you to have a look.
>
> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>
>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>>
>>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>>> We should try
>>>
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>>
>>> again for 4.1.8.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>>>>>>>> There are two categories:
>>>>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>>>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>>>>>>> port of 4.1.7.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been
>>>>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>>>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>>>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <ms...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build
>>>>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it
>>>>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>>>>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this was
>>>>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>>>>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>>>>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>>>>>>>> have the changes.
>>>>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>>>>>> all objects get visited
>>>>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>>>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>>>>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>>>>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>>>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should
>>>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be
>>>>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the
>>>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>>>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>>>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>>>>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>>>>> build with Java 8?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Jim,
Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I
wanted you to have a look.
Maybe the patch works also with 10.7?
Regards,
Matthias
>
>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim, Don,
>>
>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>> We should try
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>>
>> again for 4.1.8.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>>>>>>> There are two categories:
>>>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>>>>>> port of 4.1.7.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been
>>>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <ms...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build
>>>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it
>>>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>>>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this was
>>>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>>>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>>>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>>>>>>> have the changes.
>>>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>>>>> all objects get visited
>>>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>>>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>>>>
>>>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>>>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should
>>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be
>>>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the
>>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>>>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>>>> build with Java 8?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO418 cherry picks
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim, Don,
>
> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>
> We should try
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>
> again for 4.1.8.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>
>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>>>>>> There are two categories:
>>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk
>>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD
>>>>>> port of 4.1.7.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been
>>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to
>>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to revisit:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f
>>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <ms...@apache.org>
>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build
>>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it
>>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments
>>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this was
>>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version
>>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK.
>>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which
>>>>>> have the changes.
>>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal
>>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that
>>>>> all objects get visited
>>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using
>>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API
>>>>>
>>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other.
>>>>>
>>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to
>>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback.
>>>>
>>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8.
>>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim.
>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should
>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be
>>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the
>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it.
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double
>>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE.
>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not
>>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we
>>> build with Java 8?
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org <ma...@openoffice.apache.org>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org