You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM> on 2006/08/01 16:28:29 UTC
Re: Influencing the standards which govern Derby
I wanted to summarize where I think this discussion stands now:
1) SQL - Individuals can influence the SQL spec by renting cheap seats
from ANSI for $500/year. See
http://www.ansi.org/membership/overview/overview.aspx?menuid=2.
2) JDBC - Fortunately, the JDBC spec lead will continue to be a member
of our community. In addition, individuals can join the JCP for free.
See http://jcp.org/en/participation/membership.
3) DRDA - No-one has proposed a strategy for influencing DRDA.
I have emailed my contacts at the DBIOP Consortium, the body which
governs the DRDA spec. I asked them whether they would consider offering
Derby a cheap seat like ANSI, a scholarship, or some other creative way
to participate. I was told the following:
3a) The DBIOP Contortium doesn't offer cheap seats or scholarships.
3b) However, it might be possible for a Consortium member to act as
Derby's sponsor, advocating our proposals provided that our submissionis
were complete. So far this is just a possibility. I don't know how
likely it is.
Regards,
-Rick
Rick Hillegas wrote:
> I would like to understand how the community influences the standards
> which govern Derby:
>
> 1) SQL - I've been participating in Derby for a year now. Over the
> past year I don't recall any discussion about a need to change the SQL
> standard. We have proposed new language in rare cases not covered by
> the ANSI volumes. However, I don't recall any attempt to contact the
> SQL group and try to change their spec. Do we need to influence this
> spec and if so, how do we propose to do so?
>
> 2) JDBC - There has been substantial discussion about the upcoming
> JDBC4 spec.. Fortunately for us, the spec lead is a member of our
> community. In several cases he has taken our viewpoint back to the
> JDBC expert group and advocated our position. However, we don't know
> who will lead the expert group for JDBC5. How do we expect to
> influence the next rev of JDBC?
>
> 3) DRDA - Over the last year, I failed to get a Boolean datatype into
> the DRDA spec. This stemmed from the internal dynamics and
> pay-for-play nature of the spec's governing body, the DBIOP
> Consortium. How do we expect to influence the DRDA spec?
>
> If there's a general solution which covers all of these cases, that's
> great. If we handle each spec differently, that's fine too. I'd just
> like some discussion and guidance.
>
> Thanks,
> -Rick
Re: Influencing the standards which govern Derby
Posted by "Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>.
Rick Hillegas wrote:
> I wanted to summarize where I think this discussion stands now:
...
> 2) JDBC - Fortunately, the JDBC spec lead will continue to be a member
> of our community. In addition, individuals can join the JCP for free.
> See http://jcp.org/en/participation/membership.
Individuals can also get involved inside Apache -- details are at
http://www.apache.org/jcp/ .
-jean