You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Sergi Mola (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2025/08/28 13:58:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-22385) OpenTelemetry: Unclosed Span Scope with Parallel Multicast
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-22385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18016796#comment-18016796 ]
Sergi Mola commented on CAMEL-22385:
------------------------------------
Here are some logs from setting opentelemetry to debug:
```
2025-08-28T13:50:58.200Z Camel (camel-1) thread #6 - Multicast DEBUG i.o.s.t.SdkSpan | Ignoring setStatus() description since status is not ERROR.
2025-08-28T13:50:58.202Z Camel (camel-1) thread #6 - Multicast DEBUG i.o.c.ThreadLocalContextStorage | Trying to close scope which does not represent current context. Ignoring the call.
2025-08-28T13:50:58.203Z Camel (camel-1) thread #6 - Multicast DEBUG i.o.c.ThreadLocalContextStorage | Trying to close scope which does not represent current context. Ignoring the call.
2025-08-28T13:50:58.203Z Camel (camel-1) thread #6 - Multicast DEBUG i.o.c.ThreadLocalContextStorage | Trying to close scope which does not represent current context. Ignoring the call.
```
> OpenTelemetry: Unclosed Span Scope with Parallel Multicast
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-22385
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-22385
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: camel-opentelemetry
> Affects Versions: 4.14.0
> Environment: Here's my configuration:
> ```
> @Override
> public void configure() {
> // 1. Consume messages from a starting endpoint
> from(RouteEndpoints.INBOUND_ENDPOINT.getValue())
> .routeId("MyBusinessLogicRoute")
> // 2. Validate the incoming message
> .choice()
> // A generic predicate checks for validity
> .when(header("isValid").isEqualTo(false))
> .log("Invalid message received. Routing to dead-letter queue.")
> .to(RouteEndpoints.DLQ_ENDPOINT.getValue()) // Send to Dead Letter Queue
> .otherwise()
> // 3. Route the message based on its type
> .choice()
> // Check for a specific "type" field in the JSON body
> .when().jsonpath("$[?(@.messageType == 'Confirmation')]")
> .to(RouteEndpoints.STORE_ENDPOINT.getValue()) // Store confirmation events
> .otherwise()
> // 4. Process other events in parallel
> .multicast()
> .parallelProcessing()
> // Send to two different endpoints simultaneously
> .to(RouteEndpoints.SEND_ENDPOINT.getValue(),
> RouteEndpoints.STORE_ENDPOINT.getValue())
> .end() // Closes the multicast
> .end() // Closes the inner choice
> .end(); // Closes the outer choice
> ```
> Reporter: Sergi Mola
> Assignee: Pasquale Congiusti
> Priority: Major
> Labels: opentelemetry, telemetry, trace, tracing
> Attachments: with_parallel_processing.png, without_parallel_processing.png
>
>
> I'm encountering a tracing issue with the {{camel-opentelemetry2}} component, specifically when using a {{multicast}} EIP with {{{}parallelProcessing{}}}.
> *Problem:* The root {{Span}} for my SQS-triggered route is failing to close. I believe this is because the {{Scope}} associated with this span is not being properly closed and detached from the thread after the {{multicast}} with {{parallelProcessing}} completes.
> *Observed Behavior:*
> # *Leaked Trace Context:* Due to the unclosed scope, subsequent, unrelated spans (in this case SQS reads ) are incorrectly attached to the trace of the completed route.
> # *Cycle Repetition:* This behavior persists until a new message is consumed from the SQS queue, which starts a new trace. However, this new trace then suffers from the same issue.
> *Key Finding:* The tracing behaves as expected (the root span's scope is closed correctly) if {{parallelProcessing}} is removed from the {{{}multicast{}}}.
> This suggests an issue with how the OpenTelemetry tracer handles the thread context lifecycle during asynchronous, parallel processing. I've attached screenshots illustrating the difference.
>
> See attached screenshots.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)