[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10967) Add configuration for BlockPlacementPolicy to avoid near-full DataNodes

["genericqa (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16277759#comment-16277759 ] 

genericqa commented on HDFS-10967:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m  6s{color} | {color:red} HDFS-10967 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-10967 |
| JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12832548/HDFS-10967.03.patch |
| Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/22279/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.7.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Add configuration for BlockPlacementPolicy to avoid near-full DataNodes
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10967
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10967
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>            Reporter: Zhe Zhang
>            Assignee: Zhe Zhang
>              Labels: balancer
>         Attachments: HDFS-10967.00.patch, HDFS-10967.01.patch, HDFS-10967.02.patch, HDFS-10967.03.patch
>
>
> Large production clusters are likely to have heterogeneous nodes in terms of storage capacity, memory, and CPU cores. It is not always possible to proportionally ingest data into DataNodes based on their remaining storage capacity. Therefore it's possible for a subset of DataNodes to be much closer to full capacity than the rest.
> This heterogeneity is most likely rack-by-rack -- i.e. _m_ whole racks of low-storage nodes and _n_ whole racks of high-storage nodes. So It'd be very useful if we can lower the chance for those near-full DataNodes to become destinations for the 2nd and 3rd replicas.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org