You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@creadur.apache.org by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> on 2010/06/01 11:12:09 UTC

Re: xml output from ant task

On 2010-05-31, Gav... wrote:

>> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
>> Sent: Friday, 28 May 2010 1:36 AM

>> On 2010-05-27, Gav... wrote:

>>>> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]

>>>> In theory the CLI should be able to perform the XSLT transformation
>>>> for you in one go - this is how it creates the plain text output
>>>> after all.

This is now implemented in trunk.

>>> (http://ci.apache.org/projects/rat-master-summary.html)

>> Is there any way to have that page gather input from sources other
>> than buildbot?  Say I wanted to have RAT reports on a bunch of code
>> bases but don't need a full buildbot configuration because I already
>> have CI builds in place (or don't care).

> We need a rat-report.xml file so that it can be pulled into the
> page. If that file is available publically I guess we can use curl or
> something to grab it, but that is assuming you are already running RAT
> reports and that you are producing xml output.

I see.  So far there isn't anything concrete but in the back of my mind
I'm adding RAT as a builder to Gump - and Ant and some of its
subprojects are built via Hudson.  But this is a discussion for a
different list, I guess.

One problem I see is that we need to push out a release - at least a
SNAPSHOT release - if we want more projects to start using the XML
generating versions of the Ant task or the Maven plugin with Jukka's
patch.

Stefan

Re: Release RAT 0.7?

Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2010-06-08, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:

>>> who wants to be RM ?

>> Personally I'd prefer it if anybody more Maven savvy than myself could
>> take the driver's seat here.

> Being the one who released 0.6, I can jump in here.

Thank you.

Stefan

Re: Release RAT 0.7? (was Re: xml output from ant task)

Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:

>> who wants to be RM ?
>
> Personally I'd prefer it if anybody more Maven savvy than myself could
> take the driver's seat here.

Being the one who released 0.6, I can jump in here.

Jochen


-- 
Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling!

Re: Release RAT 0.7?

Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2010-06-08, sebb wrote:

> On 08/06/2010, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:

>> On 2010-06-08, sebb wrote:

>>> In the meantime, would anyone mind if I fixed some incorrect SVN properties?

>>  not at all.

> OK, I've just done the rest

Thank you

Stefan

Re: Release RAT 0.7?

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 08/06/2010, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2010-06-08, sebb wrote:
>
>  > In the meantime, would anyone mind if I fixed some incorrect SVN properties?
>
>  not at all.

OK, I've just done the rest - I did not want to clutter the e-mail, so
only included two of the changes below.

>  > e.g.
>  > svn pd svn:executable ant-task-examples.xml
>  > and
>  > svn ps svn:eol-style native apache-rat/src/site/site.xml
>
>  I've just now applied these, thanks
>
>
>  Stefan
>

Re: Release RAT 0.7?

Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2010-06-08, sebb wrote:

> In the meantime, would anyone mind if I fixed some incorrect SVN properties?

not at all.

> e.g.
> svn pd svn:executable ant-task-examples.xml
> and
> svn ps svn:eol-style native apache-rat/src/site/site.xml

I've just now applied these, thanks

Stefan

Re: Release RAT 0.7? (was Re: xml output from ant task)

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 08/06/2010, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Maybe this just requires a fresh thread.
>
>  Context: The Ant task and Maven plugin can now create XML reports rather
>  than plain text (and apply custom stylesheets).  In addition the CLI
>  interface can now apply a custom stylesheet as well.
>
>  <http://ci.apache.org/projects/rat-master-summary.html> is helped a lot
>  by the XML output and life would become easier if projects had released
>  versions of the plugin or task to rely on.
>
>  On 2010-06-01, Gav... wrote:
>
>  > Yes +1, I think what has been done lately is certainly enough to warrant a
>  > new release. It was also be so handy for the master-rat-summary page too if
>  > I was able to pull in all those Hudson built rat reports too.
>
>  > I think we need to update our docs to reflect the new additions, I can
>  > start on that,
>
>  I didn't know we had docs 8-)
>
>  > who wants to be RM ?
>
>  Personally I'd prefer it if anybody more Maven savvy than myself could
>  take the driver's seat here.
>

I'm not offering to RM, but I can perhaps help with some Maven
aspects, as I've just been working on BSF3 which has a complicated
Maven structure.

In the meantime, would anyone mind if I fixed some incorrect SVN properties?

e.g.
svn pd svn:executable ant-task-examples.xml
and
svn ps svn:eol-style native apache-rat/src/site/site.xml

>  Stefan
>

Release RAT 0.7? (was Re: xml output from ant task)

Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
Maybe this just requires a fresh thread.

Context: The Ant task and Maven plugin can now create XML reports rather
than plain text (and apply custom stylesheets).  In addition the CLI
interface can now apply a custom stylesheet as well.

<http://ci.apache.org/projects/rat-master-summary.html> is helped a lot
by the XML output and life would become easier if projects had released
versions of the plugin or task to rely on.

On 2010-06-01, Gav... wrote:

> Yes +1, I think what has been done lately is certainly enough to warrant a
> new release. It was also be so handy for the master-rat-summary page too if
> I was able to pull in all those Hudson built rat reports too.

> I think we need to update our docs to reflect the new additions, I can
> start on that,

I didn't know we had docs 8-)

> who wants to be RM ?

Personally I'd prefer it if anybody more Maven savvy than myself could
take the driver's seat here.

Stefan

RE: xml output from ant task

Posted by "Gav..." <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 June 2010 7:12 PM
> To: rat-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: xml output from ant task
> 
> On 2010-05-31, Gav... wrote:
> 
> >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
> >> Sent: Friday, 28 May 2010 1:36 AM
> 
> >> On 2010-05-27, Gav... wrote:
> 
> >>>> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
> 
> >>>> In theory the CLI should be able to perform the XSLT
> transformation
> >>>> for you in one go - this is how it creates the plain text output
> >>>> after all.
> 
> This is now implemented in trunk.
> 
> >>> (http://ci.apache.org/projects/rat-master-summary.html)
> 
> >> Is there any way to have that page gather input from sources other
> >> than buildbot?  Say I wanted to have RAT reports on a bunch of code
> >> bases but don't need a full buildbot configuration because I already
> >> have CI builds in place (or don't care).
> 
> > We need a rat-report.xml file so that it can be pulled into the
> > page. If that file is available publically I guess we can use curl or
> > something to grab it, but that is assuming you are already running
> RAT
> > reports and that you are producing xml output.
> 
> I see.  So far there isn't anything concrete but in the back of my mind
> I'm adding RAT as a builder to Gump - and Ant and some of its
> subprojects are built via Hudson.  But this is a discussion for a
> different list, I guess.
> 
> One problem I see is that we need to push out a release - at least a
> SNAPSHOT release - if we want more projects to start using the XML
> generating versions of the Ant task or the Maven plugin with Jukka's
> patch.

Yes +1, I think what has been done lately is certainly enough to warrant a
new release. It was also be so handy for the master-rat-summary page too if
I was able to pull in all those Hudson built rat reports too.

I think we need to update our docs to reflect the new additions, I can start
on
that, who wants to be RM ?

Gav...

> 
> Stefan