You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by Michael Lück <mi...@lueckonline.net> on 2014/02/19 13:46:45 UTC

Reopen Bug 50618?

Hi,

i just built a testplan which seems to be a special case of Bug 50618 
(Jmeter Version 2.10 r1553061)

It contains an If Controller which is always false and below it a 
While-Controller with a javaScript Evaluation. The variable referenced 
by that Evaluation is not set. Because it may be initialized within the 
if. But since the if is false i rather not expect that anything below it 
is executed.

SO should i reopen 50618 or add a new one?

Regards,
Michael




Re: Reopen Bug 50618?

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Best to open a new bug as that was for a much earlier version of JMeter.

You can add a note that it may be related to the previous bug.


On 19 February 2014 12:46, Michael Lück <mi...@lueckonline.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i just built a testplan which seems to be a special case of Bug 50618
> (Jmeter Version 2.10 r1553061)
>
> It contains an If Controller which is always false and below it a
> While-Controller with a javaScript Evaluation. The variable referenced by
> that Evaluation is not set. Because it may be initialized within the if. But
> since the if is false i rather not expect that anything below it is
> executed.
>
> SO should i reopen 50618 or add a new one?
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
>
>

Re: Reopen Bug 50618?

Posted by Michael Lück <mi...@lueckonline.net>.
Forgot to add the Tesplan. So here it is

Am 19.02.2014 13:46, schrieb Michael Lück:
> Hi,
>
> i just built a testplan which seems to be a special case of Bug 50618 
> (Jmeter Version 2.10 r1553061)
>
> It contains an If Controller which is always false and below it a 
> While-Controller with a javaScript Evaluation. The variable referenced 
> by that Evaluation is not set. Because it may be initialized within 
> the if. But since the if is false i rather not expect that anything 
> below it is executed.
>
> SO should i reopen 50618 or add a new one?
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
>
>