You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/04/22 18:53:24 UTC

[GitHub] [nifi] markobean commented on a change in pull request #3442: NIFI-6225 Added alphabetical sort onto relationship lists for Connection dialog

markobean commented on a change in pull request #3442: NIFI-6225 Added alphabetical sort onto relationship lists for Connection dialog
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3442#discussion_r277393685
 
 

 ##########
 File path: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-ui/src/main/webapp/js/nf/canvas/nf-connection-configuration.js
 ##########
 @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
                 initializeSourceProcessor(source).done(function (processor) {
                     if (!nfCommon.isEmpty(processor.relationships)) {
                         // populate the available connections
-                        $.each(processor.relationships, function (i, relationship) {
+                        $.each(processor.relationships.sort(), function (i, relationship) {
 
 Review comment:
   @mcgilman, I observed the out-of-order of Relationships only in a cluster environment. I could not reproduce in a stand-alone. The ordering is not the list of processor properties (e.g. RouteOnAttribute with several user-defined relationships.) Rather, it is the "For Relationships" list on the Connection configuration. Moreover, the list appears correctly sorted when creating a new relationship. However, when returning to the configuration of the same Connection, the "For Relationships" is now out of order. This observation also points to a problem with the Cluster merging logic since when creating a new Connection, the Cluster is not queried (I don't believe), but it is when viewing the configuration of a Connection.
   I think you are correct in this  having to do with it being a Set (not ordered) in the DTO. Specifically, I noted ConnectionDTO.getAvailableRelationships method returns a Set. Perhaps this should be a List instead?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services