[jira] Commented: (MNG-3284) Cached plugins are used, even when the specifically declared

["Brett Porter (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>]

    [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_126696 ] 

Brett Porter commented on MNG-3284:
-----------------------------------

this looks good to me - if you have a chance could you turn the reproduction into the integration test format?

> Cached plugins are used, even when the specifically declared 
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-3284
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3284
>             Project: Maven 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Dependencies, Plugins and Lifecycle
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.7
>            Reporter: Nigel Magnay
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: 0001-Initial-fix-to-see-if-we-can-have-1-version-of-a-pl.patch, maven-bug-2.tar, pluginbug.tar
>
>
> In the attached project, you can build module A, then build module B, but the top level aggregator project will fail at B.
> The reason this happens is that maven seems to cache plugins. When B is built in isolation, all things are fine - but when built in aggregation, one of the plugins that it uses has already been instantiated, and so it uses that one. This is incorrect, since the declared version is different in B, and is relying on functionality not present in the version declared in A.
> I have seen similar behaviour when a plugin relies on other plugins to get work done - all of a sudden a build mysteriously stops working, because of a completely unrelated plugin.
> This is pretty painful because
> - it's possible to get into a 'no solution', where one project relies on one behaviour so can't upgrade, and one project relies on new behaviour, so can't downgrade.
> - you get builds that work OK in isolation, but not in their project. This is bad. Also builds tied together in bigger aggregator projects can fail in mysterious ways (mysterious because the user /has/ specified the plugin version, and maven has ignored them, or it's a plugin dependency that got there first)
> - subtle build ordering changes can cause new failures (the example has B depend on A - but the bug might only manifest itself in certain build orders that change even when B and A don't).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira