You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> on 2013/11/05 06:03:04 UTC
1.5.1?
I've perused over the closed tickets a couple of times now. Nothing huge
has jumped out at me, but, given how long it's been since 1.5.0, it
wouldn't be a bad idea to release a 1.5.1 with appropriate bug fixes.
Thoughts? My thought was that since we shouldn't have been reworking
anything big in the 1.5 line, it should make it easier to test/release.
Re: 1.5.1?
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Maybe I misunderstood Sean's suggestion. I thought he meant wait until
a little time after 1.6.0 release, in case post-release bugs arise. If
that's what he meant, I disagree. Those can go in 1.5.2.
However, if he meant wait until 1.6.0, so that bugs found in testing
1.6.0 can be fixed in 1.5.1 also, then I agree. I think we should plan
to release 1.5.1 concurrently or immediately following 1.6.0.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cool.
>
> Let's keep that in mind then as we test 1.6.0. As we get into the actual
> testing phase, I'll try to get my computer provisioned up to run at least 2
> tservers and see if I can get some testing done concurrently. Maybe some
> bugs will shake out the other way (1.5.1->1.6.0) as well.
>
>
> On 11/5/13, 10:52 AM, Keith Turner wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:44 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with Mr. Busbey
>>>
>>
>> Me too. In past 1.X.0 release testing we have found a few bugs that exist
>> in earlier release that are worth fixing.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
>>> On Nov 5, 2013 1:16 AM, "Sean Busbey" <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I've perused over the closed tickets a couple of times now. Nothing
>>>
>>> huge
>>>>>
>>>>> has jumped out at me, but, given how long it's been since 1.5.0, it
>>>>> wouldn't be a bad idea to release a 1.5.1 with appropriate bug fixes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts? My thought was that since we shouldn't have been reworking
>>>>> anything big in the 1.5 line, it should make it easier to test/release.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The ZooKeeper fail-over bug was a big deal. Also, just the volume
>>>
>>> concerns
>>>>
>>>> me.
>>>>
>>>> We should wait until after 1.6.0 makes it out, in case any fixes that
>>>> surface are applicable to the 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT branch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sean
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: 1.5.1?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Cool.
Let's keep that in mind then as we test 1.6.0. As we get into the actual
testing phase, I'll try to get my computer provisioned up to run at
least 2 tservers and see if I can get some testing done concurrently.
Maybe some bugs will shake out the other way (1.5.1->1.6.0) as well.
On 11/5/13, 10:52 AM, Keith Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:44 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I agree with Mr. Busbey
>>
>
> Me too. In past 1.X.0 release testing we have found a few bugs that exist
> in earlier release that are worth fixing.
>
>
>>
>> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
>> On Nov 5, 2013 1:16 AM, "Sean Busbey" <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've perused over the closed tickets a couple of times now. Nothing
>> huge
>>>> has jumped out at me, but, given how long it's been since 1.5.0, it
>>>> wouldn't be a bad idea to release a 1.5.1 with appropriate bug fixes.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts? My thought was that since we shouldn't have been reworking
>>>> anything big in the 1.5 line, it should make it easier to test/release.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The ZooKeeper fail-over bug was a big deal. Also, just the volume
>> concerns
>>> me.
>>>
>>> We should wait until after 1.6.0 makes it out, in case any fixes that
>>> surface are applicable to the 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT branch.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sean
>>>
>>
>
Re: 1.5.1?
Posted by Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:44 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> I agree with Mr. Busbey
>
Me too. In past 1.X.0 release testing we have found a few bugs that exist
in earlier release that are worth fixing.
>
> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
> On Nov 5, 2013 1:16 AM, "Sean Busbey" <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I've perused over the closed tickets a couple of times now. Nothing
> huge
> > > has jumped out at me, but, given how long it's been since 1.5.0, it
> > > wouldn't be a bad idea to release a 1.5.1 with appropriate bug fixes.
> > >
> > > Thoughts? My thought was that since we shouldn't have been reworking
> > > anything big in the 1.5 line, it should make it easier to test/release.
> > >
> >
> > The ZooKeeper fail-over bug was a big deal. Also, just the volume
> concerns
> > me.
> >
> > We should wait until after 1.6.0 makes it out, in case any fixes that
> > surface are applicable to the 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT branch.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sean
> >
>
Re: 1.5.1?
Posted by John Vines <vi...@apache.org>.
I agree with Mr. Busbey
Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
On Nov 5, 2013 1:16 AM, "Sean Busbey" <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I've perused over the closed tickets a couple of times now. Nothing huge
> > has jumped out at me, but, given how long it's been since 1.5.0, it
> > wouldn't be a bad idea to release a 1.5.1 with appropriate bug fixes.
> >
> > Thoughts? My thought was that since we shouldn't have been reworking
> > anything big in the 1.5 line, it should make it easier to test/release.
> >
>
> The ZooKeeper fail-over bug was a big deal. Also, just the volume concerns
> me.
>
> We should wait until after 1.6.0 makes it out, in case any fixes that
> surface are applicable to the 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT branch.
>
>
> --
> Sean
>
Re: 1.5.1?
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Those can go in 1.5.2.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've perused over the closed tickets a couple of times now. Nothing huge
>> has jumped out at me, but, given how long it's been since 1.5.0, it
>> wouldn't be a bad idea to release a 1.5.1 with appropriate bug fixes.
>>
>> Thoughts? My thought was that since we shouldn't have been reworking
>> anything big in the 1.5 line, it should make it easier to test/release.
>>
>
> The ZooKeeper fail-over bug was a big deal. Also, just the volume concerns
> me.
>
> We should wait until after 1.6.0 makes it out, in case any fixes that
> surface are applicable to the 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT branch.
>
>
> --
> Sean
Re: 1.5.1?
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've perused over the closed tickets a couple of times now. Nothing huge
> has jumped out at me, but, given how long it's been since 1.5.0, it
> wouldn't be a bad idea to release a 1.5.1 with appropriate bug fixes.
>
> Thoughts? My thought was that since we shouldn't have been reworking
> anything big in the 1.5 line, it should make it easier to test/release.
>
The ZooKeeper fail-over bug was a big deal. Also, just the volume concerns
me.
We should wait until after 1.6.0 makes it out, in case any fixes that
surface are applicable to the 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT branch.
--
Sean