You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@karaf.apache.org by "Jean-Baptiste Onofré (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/01/13 17:39:49 UTC

[jira] Commented: (KARAF-380) Add .jar deployer autowrapping non-bundle-jar files dropped to deploy folder

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981324#action_12981324 ] 

Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on KARAF-380:
--------------------------------------------

It's a good idea Andreas.

The PAX URL wrap: protocol provides the possibility to define OSGi statement in the URI (such as the Bundle-SymbolicName, etc).
What do you think to add a .osgi file near the .jar file describing the OSGi statements, like:

my.jar
my.osgi

where my.osgi contains:

Bundle-SymbolicName:
Bundle-Version:

etc ?

> Add .jar deployer autowrapping non-bundle-jar files dropped to deploy folder
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KARAF-380
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-380
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Andreas Pieber
>
> See http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/karaf-dev/201101.mbox/browser for full discussion; short summary:
> My concern is to deploy clients JARs like by example JARS used by project Apache Hadoop
> If we detect a file in the deploy/ directory with the extension '.jar', AND the JAR's manifest does NOT contain any OSGi headers, THEN we assume that it's a plain-old-jar, and perform an auto-wrap.
> Using the OSGi ranking attribute on services should be sufficient in order to keep them ordered.
> And checking the 'jar' extension would clearly remove most of the bad situations for that case.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.