You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@systemml.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2016/10/30 02:25:20 UTC
SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4:
https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html
Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new RC
vote asap.
Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been addressed in the
past, so we need to figure out what is causing some of these regressions.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Posted by Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
For now, we should document every artifacts being created in release doc (and/or website), which can be updated when artifacts get reduced.
-Arvind
From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <de...@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
For some reason, I got an impression that artifacts reduction was completed earlier, but apparently its not.We are trying to reduce number of artifacts to avoid confusion to users.This is an issue from earlier releases as well, not being introduced as a part of SystemML 0.11 release.
We can address it immediately after SystemML 0.11 goes out. We should not mark this as a blocking issue for SystemML 0.11.
-Arvind
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Also, to quote Justin Mclean:
> "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for
> instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify."
>
> From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts
> is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this confusion by dropping our
> number of released artifacts, as addressed by
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926.
>
> Deron
>
>
>
Ok, I have marked the jira above as blocker for 0.11 release. Could you
guys please make sure all other remaining blocking issues are marked as so
for 0.11 release, so it makes it easier for myself to check when the next
RC should be created.
Thanks
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Posted by Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
For some reason, I got an impression that artifacts reduction was completed earlier, but apparently its not.We are trying to reduce number of artifacts to avoid confusion to users.This is an issue from earlier releases as well, not being introduced as a part of SystemML 0.11 release.
We can address it immediately after SystemML 0.11 goes out. We should not mark this as a blocking issue for SystemML 0.11.
-Arvind
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Also, to quote Justin Mclean:
> "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for
> instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify."
>
> From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts
> is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this confusion by dropping our
> number of released artifacts, as addressed by
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926.
>
> Deron
>
>
>
Ok, I have marked the jira above as blocker for 0.11 release. Could you
guys please make sure all other remaining blocking issues are marked as so
for 0.11 release, so it makes it easier for myself to check when the next
RC should be created.
Thanks
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Posted by Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
These issues can/should be documented under "known issues" in release note.
-Arvind
From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <de...@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
SYSTEMML-1076, SYSTEMML-1077 issues are related to experimental feature DeepLearning/GPU being added to SystemML 0.11. These issues are specific to condition articulated in Jira's.We should have Jira opened and fixed before we can support DeepLearning/GPU fully.For now these should not be "Blocking" for SystemML 0.11 release.
-Arvind
From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
There are also two bugs related to max pooling that I'd like to get a fix for into 0.11: SYSTEMML-1076, SYSTEMML-1077.
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Also, to quote Justin Mclean:
>> "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for
>> instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify."
>>
>> From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts
>> is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this confusion by dropping our
>> number of released artifacts, as addressed by
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926.
>>
>> Deron
>>
>>
>>
> Ok, I have marked the jira above as blocker for 0.11 release. Could you
> guys please make sure all other remaining blocking issues are marked as so
> for 0.11 release, so it makes it easier for myself to check when the next
> RC should be created.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Posted by Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
SYSTEMML-1076, SYSTEMML-1077 issues are related to experimental feature DeepLearning/GPU being added to SystemML 0.11. These issues are specific to condition articulated in Jira's.We should have Jira opened and fixed before we can support DeepLearning/GPU fully.For now these should not be "Blocking" for SystemML 0.11 release.
-Arvind
From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
There are also two bugs related to max pooling that I'd like to get a fix for into 0.11: SYSTEMML-1076, SYSTEMML-1077.
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Also, to quote Justin Mclean:
>> "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for
>> instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify."
>>
>> From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts
>> is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this confusion by dropping our
>> number of released artifacts, as addressed by
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926.
>>
>> Deron
>>
>>
>>
> Ok, I have marked the jira above as blocker for 0.11 release. Could you
> guys please make sure all other remaining blocking issues are marked as so
> for 0.11 release, so it makes it easier for myself to check when the next
> RC should be created.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Posted by du...@gmail.com.
There are also two bugs related to max pooling that I'd like to get a fix for into 0.11: SYSTEMML-1076, SYSTEMML-1077.
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Also, to quote Justin Mclean:
>> "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for
>> instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify."
>>
>> From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts
>> is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this confusion by dropping our
>> number of released artifacts, as addressed by
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926.
>>
>> Deron
>>
>>
>>
> Ok, I have marked the jira above as blocker for 0.11 release. Could you
> guys please make sure all other remaining blocking issues are marked as so
> for 0.11 release, so it makes it easier for myself to check when the next
> RC should be created.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Also, to quote Justin Mclean:
> "It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for
> instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify."
>
> From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts
> is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this confusion by dropping our
> number of released artifacts, as addressed by
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926.
>
> Deron
>
>
>
Ok, I have marked the jira above as blocker for 0.11 release. Could you
guys please make sure all other remaining blocking issues are marked as so
for 0.11 release, so it makes it easier for myself to check when the next
RC should be created.
Thanks
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
Also, to quote Justin Mclean:
"It not clear to me what exactly is the release artefacts here, for
instance why does this directory include jars? Can you please clarify."
From this response, I think it is clear that our large number of artifacts
is causing confusion. We can in part reduce this confusion by dropping our
number of released artifacts, as addressed by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926.
Deron
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I mentioned here that the "source-release.zip" is not something I
> recognize: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> org/msg00960.html
>
> Is this mystery artifact created by the script to deploy release
> candidates?
>
> It should definitely be removed in my opinion.
>
> Deron
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Glenn Weidner <gw...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I've opened JIRA/PR (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-1075)
>> for review to address item [2] of https://www.mail-archive.com/g
>> eneral@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Glenn
>>
>> [image: Inactive hide details for Glenn Weidner---10/29/2016 09:52:05
>> PM---Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be rem]Glenn
>> Weidner---10/29/2016 09:52:05 PM---Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>> be removed since there already is a src artifa
>>
>> From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> Date: 10/29/2016 09:52 PM
>> Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be removed since
>> there already is a src artifact systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Glenn
>>
>> Luciano Resende ---10/29/2016 07:25:40 PM---Please see IPMC feedback on
>> our RC4:
>> *https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56*
>> <https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56>
>>
>> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> Date: 10/29/2016 07:25 PM
>> Subject: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4:
>> *https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html*
>> <https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html>
>>
>> Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new
>> RC
>> vote asap.
>>
>> Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been addressed in the
>> past, so we need to figure out what is causing some of these regressions.
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I mentioned here that the "source-release.zip" is not something I
recognize:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00960.html
Is this mystery artifact created by the script to deploy release candidates?
It should definitely be removed in my opinion.
Deron
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Glenn Weidner <gw...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> I've opened JIRA/PR (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-1075)
> for review to address item [2] of https://www.mail-archive.com/
> general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html.
>
> Thanks,
> Glenn
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Glenn Weidner---10/29/2016 09:52:05
> PM---Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be rem]Glenn
> Weidner---10/29/2016 09:52:05 PM---Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip
> be removed since there already is a src artifa
>
> From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/29/2016 09:52 PM
> Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be removed since
> there already is a src artifact systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip?
>
> Thanks,
> Glenn
>
> Luciano Resende ---10/29/2016 07:25:40 PM---Please see IPMC feedback on
> our RC4: *https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56*
> <https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56>
>
> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/29/2016 07:25 PM
> Subject: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4:
> *https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html*
> <https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html>
>
> Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new RC
> vote asap.
>
> Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been addressed in the
> past, so we need to figure out what is causing some of these regressions.
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Posted by Glenn Weidner <gw...@us.ibm.com>.
I've opened JIRA/PR (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-1075)
for review to address item [2] of
https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html.
Thanks,
Glenn
From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/29/2016 09:52 PM
Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be removed since
there already is a src artifact systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip?
Thanks,
Glenn
Luciano Resende ---10/29/2016 07:25:40 PM---Please see IPMC feedback on our
RC4: https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/29/2016 07:25 PM
Subject: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4:
https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html
Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new RC
vote asap.
Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been addressed in the
past, so we need to figure out what is causing some of these regressions.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Posted by Glenn Weidner <gw...@us.ibm.com>.
Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be removed since
there already is a src artifact systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip?
Thanks,
Glenn
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/29/2016 07:25 PM
Subject: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4:
https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html
Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new RC
vote asap.
Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been addressed in the
past, so we need to figure out what is causing some of these regressions.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/