[jira] [Created] (JENA-615) Possible optimisation for FILTER(?var != )

["Rob Vesse (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

Rob Vesse created JENA-615:
------------------------------

             Summary: Possible optimisation for FILTER(?var != <constant>)
                 Key: JENA-615
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-615
             Project: Apache Jena
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: ARQ
            Reporter: Rob Vesse
            Assignee: Rob Vesse
            Priority: Minor


I have an idea for a possible optimisation for queries of the following general form:
{noformat}
SELECT *
WHERE
{
  # Some Patterns
  FILTER(?var != <http://constant>)
} 
{noformat}

This pattern crops up surprisingly often in real SPARQL workloads since it is often used to either limit a variable to exclude certain possibilities or to avoid self referential links in the data.

In some cases it seems like this could be safely rewritten as follows:

{noformat}
SELECT *
WHERE
{
  # Some Patterns
  MINUS { BIND(<http://constant> AS ?var) }
}
{noformat}

Or perhaps in a more generalised form like so:

{noformat}
SELECT * WHERE
{
  # Some patterns
  MINUS { VALUES ?var { <http://constant/1> <http://constant/2> } }
}
{noformat}

Which would nicely deal with the case of stating that a variable is not equal to multiple constant values.

As I pointed out earlier this would not apply in every case, specifically I think at least the following must be true:

- The variable must be guaranteed to be bound (similar to existing filter equality and implicit join optimisations)

There is also the potential to spot cases where the variable will always be unbound and thus the expression is always an error and replace the entire sub-tree with {{table empty}} as we already do for equality and implicit join filters.

I plan on taking a look at implementing this in the new year, if anyone has any thoughts on this (especially wrt to restrictions that should apply to when the optimisation is considered safe) then please comment.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)