You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jclouds.apache.org by Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com> on 2015/08/03 17:14:55 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Promoting the Azure Compute provider
Hi Francesco, all,
I'd like to share with you some thoughts around azure compute. I've seen
that using the web GUI to create a Virtual Machine, it does not require to
create a virtual network upfront. So I tried using jclouds-azurecompute to
skip the creation of the virtual network so that Azure assigns a Virtual IP
to the VM automatically. It seems to be ok.
Do you all see any issue if we remove the virtual network creation from the
GetOrCreateStorageServiceAndVirtualNetworkThenCreateNodes ?
Happy to file a jira issue to track this better, if needed.
Thank,
Andrea
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:28 AM Bhathiya Supun <hs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
>
> I have mostly finished re-basing #157 and will open a new PR as soon as we
> finish with #175
>
> Thanks
> -Bhathiya
>
>
> On 1 June 2015 at 11:15, Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I see that #154 was "moved" to #171 and again to #175: could anyone
> please
> > review?
> >
> > #157 seems to have remained steady, instead.
> >
> > Is there anything new about Azure Compute provider's promotion out of
> > labs? Any planned date for JClouds 1.9.1?
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> > On 30/04/2015 17:15, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for bringing this up Francesco,
> >>
> >> I've just merged #167, so I'd say we can wait until #154 and #157 are
> >> merged to promote Azure. #154 should be almost ready, so given that
> there
> >> are just a couple structural PRs pending, I'd wait for those and then
> >> promote the provider.
> >>
> >> On 29 April 2015 at 17:05, Bhathiya Supun <hs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Francesco,
> >>>
> >>> PR #154 is already rebsed on PR#167 and I will create a new PR by soon.
> >>> PR#157 got some merge conflicts I'll try to finish rebasing it by
> Monday.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> On 29 April 2015 at 12:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgrosso@apache.org
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>> a quick status update on the Azure Compute provider.
> >>>>
> >>>> As you might know, the Azure Compute provider has
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. the live test that extends the BaseComputeServiceLiveTest
> >>>>
> >>> (JCLOUDS-849)
> >>>
> >>>> 2. the live test that extends the BaseTemplateBuilderLiveTest
> >>>> (JCLOUDS-850)
> >>>>
> >>>> with all tests working fine in real Azure subscriptions.
> >>>>
> >>>> Moreover, since there are free MSDN subscriptions for every ASF
> >>>> committer
> >>>> (see [1] for details), such tests are reproducible by others as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> Question: is anything missing for promoting the Azure Compute provider
> >>>> from labs? If so, what are next steps?
> >>>>
> >>>> FYI, there is still some activity to be completed on this provider,
> but
> >>>> I
> >>>> don't think this is blocking for promotion:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. PR #168 (for JCLOUDS-839) - merged 9 days ago
> >>>> 2. PR #167 (for JCLOUDS-852) - should be ready to be merged, after
> >>>> some
> >>>> iterations (Ignasi?)
> >>>> 3. PR #154 (for JCLOUDS-853) - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?)
> >>>> 4. PR #157 - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
> >>>>
> >>>
> > --
> > Francesco Chicchiriccò
> >
> > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> > http://www.tirasa.net/
> >
> > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
> > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
> > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Promoting the Azure Compute provider
Posted by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>.
Hi Andrea, Ignasi,
sorry for late reply, I've been out for few days.
Your proposed changes make sense to me, please go ahead.
Regards.
On 04/08/2015 09:38, Andrea Turli wrote:
> Sure! Here we go https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-982
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:54 AM Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Thx!
>>
>> If the TemplateOptions#networks method is not honored now in Azure (and it makes sense in the provider), mind opening a JIRA for it too?
>>
>> El 4/8/2015 8:49, "Andrea Turli" <an...@gmail.com> escribió:
>>
>>> Thanks Ignasi!
>>>
>>> Here is the jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-981
>>>
>>> Notice that even without specifying an explicit virtual network, VMs can
>>> reach each other without any particular firewall management (aka endpoint
>>> in Azure).
>>>
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:08 AM Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll +1 anything that simplifies the provider.
>>>> This said, if Azure allows the users to manage networks, we should
>>>> suport the TemplateOptions.networks [1] option to let the users create
>>>> VMs attached to the desired networks. That option allows users to pass
>>>> a list of network IDs where the created nodes will be attached.
>>>>
>>>> Please, open the corresponding JIRAs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thx Andrea!
>>>>
>>>> I.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/compute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/compute/options/TemplateOptions.java#L378
>>>> On 3 August 2015 at 17:14, Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Francesco, all,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to share with you some thoughts around azure compute. I've seen that using the web GUI to create a Virtual Machine, it does not require to create a virtual network upfront. So I tried using
>>>> jclouds-azurecompute to skip the creation of the virtual network so that Azure assigns a Virtual IP to the VM automatically. It seems to be ok.
>>>>
>>>> Do you all see any issue if we remove the virtual network creation from the GetOrCreateStorageServiceAndVirtualNetworkThenCreateNodes ?
>>>>
>>>> Happy to file a jira issue to track this better, if needed.
>>>>
>>>> Thank,
>>>> Andrea
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] Promoting the Azure Compute provider
Posted by Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com>.
Sure! Here we go https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-982
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:54 AM Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thx!
>
> If the TemplateOptions#networks method is not honored now in Azure (and it
> makes sense in the provider), mind opening a JIRA for it too?
> El 4/8/2015 8:49, "Andrea Turli" <an...@gmail.com> escribió:
>
> > Thanks Ignasi!
> >
> > Here is the jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-981
> >
> > Notice that even without specifying an explicit virtual network, VMs can
> > reach each other without any particular firewall management (aka endpoint
> > in Azure).
> >
> > Andrea
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:08 AM Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I'll +1 anything that simplifies the provider.
> > > This said, if Azure allows the users to manage networks, we should
> > > suport the TemplateOptions.networks [1] option to let the users create
> > > VMs attached to the desired networks. That option allows users to pass
> > > a list of network IDs where the created nodes will be attached.
> > >
> > > Please, open the corresponding JIRAs.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thx Andrea!
> > >
> > > I.
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/compute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/compute/options/TemplateOptions.java#L378
> > >
> > > On 3 August 2015 at 17:14, Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Hi Francesco, all,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts around azure compute. I've
> > seen
> > > > that using the web GUI to create a Virtual Machine, it does not
> require
> > > to
> > > > create a virtual network upfront. So I tried using
> jclouds-azurecompute
> > > to
> > > > skip the creation of the virtual network so that Azure assigns a
> > Virtual
> > > IP
> > > > to the VM automatically. It seems to be ok.
> > > >
> > > > Do you all see any issue if we remove the virtual network creation
> from
> > > the
> > > > GetOrCreateStorageServiceAndVirtualNetworkThenCreateNodes ?
> > > >
> > > > Happy to file a jira issue to track this better, if needed.
> > > >
> > > > Thank,
> > > > Andrea
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:28 AM Bhathiya Supun <hs...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Francesco,
> > > >>
> > > >> I have mostly finished re-basing #157 and will open a new PR as
> soon
> > > as we
> > > >> finish with #175
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks
> > > >> -Bhathiya
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 1 June 2015 at 11:15, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
> ilgrosso@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> > I see that #154 was "moved" to #171 and again to #175: could
> anyone
> > > >> please
> > > >> > review?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > #157 seems to have remained steady, instead.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Is there anything new about Azure Compute provider's promotion out
> > of
> > > >> > labs? Any planned date for JClouds 1.9.1?
> > > >> > Thanks.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Regards.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 30/04/2015 17:15, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Thanks for bringing this up Francesco,
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> I've just merged #167, so I'd say we can wait until #154 and #157
> > are
> > > >> >> merged to promote Azure. #154 should be almost ready, so given
> that
> > > >> there
> > > >> >> are just a couple structural PRs pending, I'd wait for those and
> > then
> > > >> >> promote the provider.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 29 April 2015 at 17:05, Bhathiya Supun <hs...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Hi Francesco,
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> PR #154 is already rebsed on PR#167 and I will create a new PR
> by
> > > soon.
> > > >> >>> PR#157 got some merge conflicts I'll try to finish rebasing it
> by
> > > >> Monday.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Thanks
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On 29 April 2015 at 12:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
> > > ilgrosso@apache.org
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Hi all,
> > > >> >>>> a quick status update on the Azure Compute provider.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> As you might know, the Azure Compute provider has
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> 1. the live test that extends the BaseComputeServiceLiveTest
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>> (JCLOUDS-849)
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>> 2. the live test that extends the BaseTemplateBuilderLiveTest
> > > >> >>>> (JCLOUDS-850)
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> with all tests working fine in real Azure subscriptions.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Moreover, since there are free MSDN subscriptions for every ASF
> > > >> >>>> committer
> > > >> >>>> (see [1] for details), such tests are reproducible by others as
> > > well.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Question: is anything missing for promoting the Azure Compute
> > > provider
> > > >> >>>> from labs? If so, what are next steps?
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> FYI, there is still some activity to be completed on this
> > provider,
> > > >> but
> > > >> >>>> I
> > > >> >>>> don't think this is blocking for promotion:
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> 1. PR #168 (for JCLOUDS-839) - merged 9 days ago
> > > >> >>>> 2. PR #167 (for JCLOUDS-852) - should be ready to be merged,
> > > after
> > > >> >>>> some
> > > >> >>>> iterations (Ignasi?)
> > > >> >>>> 3. PR #154 (for JCLOUDS-853) - needs to be rebased
> (Bhathiya?)
> > > >> >>>> 4. PR #157 - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?)
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Regards.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> [1]
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Francesco Chicchiriccò
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> > > >> > http://www.tirasa.net/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
> > > >> > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Promoting the Azure Compute provider
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org>.
Thx!
If the TemplateOptions#networks method is not honored now in Azure (and it
makes sense in the provider), mind opening a JIRA for it too?
El 4/8/2015 8:49, "Andrea Turli" <an...@gmail.com> escribió:
> Thanks Ignasi!
>
> Here is the jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-981
>
> Notice that even without specifying an explicit virtual network, VMs can
> reach each other without any particular firewall management (aka endpoint
> in Azure).
>
> Andrea
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:08 AM Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I'll +1 anything that simplifies the provider.
> > This said, if Azure allows the users to manage networks, we should
> > suport the TemplateOptions.networks [1] option to let the users create
> > VMs attached to the desired networks. That option allows users to pass
> > a list of network IDs where the created nodes will be attached.
> >
> > Please, open the corresponding JIRAs.
> >
> >
> > Thx Andrea!
> >
> > I.
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/compute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/compute/options/TemplateOptions.java#L378
> >
> > On 3 August 2015 at 17:14, Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Francesco, all,
> > >
> > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts around azure compute. I've
> seen
> > > that using the web GUI to create a Virtual Machine, it does not require
> > to
> > > create a virtual network upfront. So I tried using jclouds-azurecompute
> > to
> > > skip the creation of the virtual network so that Azure assigns a
> Virtual
> > IP
> > > to the VM automatically. It seems to be ok.
> > >
> > > Do you all see any issue if we remove the virtual network creation from
> > the
> > > GetOrCreateStorageServiceAndVirtualNetworkThenCreateNodes ?
> > >
> > > Happy to file a jira issue to track this better, if needed.
> > >
> > > Thank,
> > > Andrea
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:28 AM Bhathiya Supun <hs...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Francesco,
> > >>
> > >> I have mostly finished re-basing #157 and will open a new PR as soon
> > as we
> > >> finish with #175
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> -Bhathiya
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 1 June 2015 at 11:15, Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> > I see that #154 was "moved" to #171 and again to #175: could anyone
> > >> please
> > >> > review?
> > >> >
> > >> > #157 seems to have remained steady, instead.
> > >> >
> > >> > Is there anything new about Azure Compute provider's promotion out
> of
> > >> > labs? Any planned date for JClouds 1.9.1?
> > >> > Thanks.
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On 30/04/2015 17:15, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Thanks for bringing this up Francesco,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I've just merged #167, so I'd say we can wait until #154 and #157
> are
> > >> >> merged to promote Azure. #154 should be almost ready, so given that
> > >> there
> > >> >> are just a couple structural PRs pending, I'd wait for those and
> then
> > >> >> promote the provider.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On 29 April 2015 at 17:05, Bhathiya Supun <hs...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Hi Francesco,
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> PR #154 is already rebsed on PR#167 and I will create a new PR by
> > soon.
> > >> >>> PR#157 got some merge conflicts I'll try to finish rebasing it by
> > >> Monday.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Thanks
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On 29 April 2015 at 12:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
> > ilgrosso@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Hi all,
> > >> >>>> a quick status update on the Azure Compute provider.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> As you might know, the Azure Compute provider has
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> 1. the live test that extends the BaseComputeServiceLiveTest
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>> (JCLOUDS-849)
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> 2. the live test that extends the BaseTemplateBuilderLiveTest
> > >> >>>> (JCLOUDS-850)
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> with all tests working fine in real Azure subscriptions.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Moreover, since there are free MSDN subscriptions for every ASF
> > >> >>>> committer
> > >> >>>> (see [1] for details), such tests are reproducible by others as
> > well.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Question: is anything missing for promoting the Azure Compute
> > provider
> > >> >>>> from labs? If so, what are next steps?
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> FYI, there is still some activity to be completed on this
> provider,
> > >> but
> > >> >>>> I
> > >> >>>> don't think this is blocking for promotion:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> 1. PR #168 (for JCLOUDS-839) - merged 9 days ago
> > >> >>>> 2. PR #167 (for JCLOUDS-852) - should be ready to be merged,
> > after
> > >> >>>> some
> > >> >>>> iterations (Ignasi?)
> > >> >>>> 3. PR #154 (for JCLOUDS-853) - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?)
> > >> >>>> 4. PR #157 - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?)
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Regards.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> [1]
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> > --
> > >> > Francesco Chicchiriccò
> > >> >
> > >> > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> > >> > http://www.tirasa.net/
> > >> >
> > >> > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
> > >> > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Promoting the Azure Compute provider
Posted by Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Ignasi!
Here is the jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-981
Notice that even without specifying an explicit virtual network, VMs can
reach each other without any particular firewall management (aka endpoint
in Azure).
Andrea
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:08 AM Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'll +1 anything that simplifies the provider.
> This said, if Azure allows the users to manage networks, we should
> suport the TemplateOptions.networks [1] option to let the users create
> VMs attached to the desired networks. That option allows users to pass
> a list of network IDs where the created nodes will be attached.
>
> Please, open the corresponding JIRAs.
>
>
> Thx Andrea!
>
> I.
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/compute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/compute/options/TemplateOptions.java#L378
>
> On 3 August 2015 at 17:14, Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Francesco, all,
> >
> > I'd like to share with you some thoughts around azure compute. I've seen
> > that using the web GUI to create a Virtual Machine, it does not require
> to
> > create a virtual network upfront. So I tried using jclouds-azurecompute
> to
> > skip the creation of the virtual network so that Azure assigns a Virtual
> IP
> > to the VM automatically. It seems to be ok.
> >
> > Do you all see any issue if we remove the virtual network creation from
> the
> > GetOrCreateStorageServiceAndVirtualNetworkThenCreateNodes ?
> >
> > Happy to file a jira issue to track this better, if needed.
> >
> > Thank,
> > Andrea
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:28 AM Bhathiya Supun <hs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Francesco,
> >>
> >> I have mostly finished re-basing #157 and will open a new PR as soon
> as we
> >> finish with #175
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -Bhathiya
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1 June 2015 at 11:15, Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> > I see that #154 was "moved" to #171 and again to #175: could anyone
> >> please
> >> > review?
> >> >
> >> > #157 seems to have remained steady, instead.
> >> >
> >> > Is there anything new about Azure Compute provider's promotion out of
> >> > labs? Any planned date for JClouds 1.9.1?
> >> > Thanks.
> >> >
> >> > Regards.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 30/04/2015 17:15, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Thanks for bringing this up Francesco,
> >> >>
> >> >> I've just merged #167, so I'd say we can wait until #154 and #157 are
> >> >> merged to promote Azure. #154 should be almost ready, so given that
> >> there
> >> >> are just a couple structural PRs pending, I'd wait for those and then
> >> >> promote the provider.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 29 April 2015 at 17:05, Bhathiya Supun <hs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Francesco,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> PR #154 is already rebsed on PR#167 and I will create a new PR by
> soon.
> >> >>> PR#157 got some merge conflicts I'll try to finish rebasing it by
> >> Monday.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 29 April 2015 at 12:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
> ilgrosso@apache.org
> >> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi all,
> >> >>>> a quick status update on the Azure Compute provider.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> As you might know, the Azure Compute provider has
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> 1. the live test that extends the BaseComputeServiceLiveTest
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> (JCLOUDS-849)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> 2. the live test that extends the BaseTemplateBuilderLiveTest
> >> >>>> (JCLOUDS-850)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> with all tests working fine in real Azure subscriptions.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Moreover, since there are free MSDN subscriptions for every ASF
> >> >>>> committer
> >> >>>> (see [1] for details), such tests are reproducible by others as
> well.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Question: is anything missing for promoting the Azure Compute
> provider
> >> >>>> from labs? If so, what are next steps?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> FYI, there is still some activity to be completed on this provider,
> >> but
> >> >>>> I
> >> >>>> don't think this is blocking for promotion:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> 1. PR #168 (for JCLOUDS-839) - merged 9 days ago
> >> >>>> 2. PR #167 (for JCLOUDS-852) - should be ready to be merged,
> after
> >> >>>> some
> >> >>>> iterations (Ignasi?)
> >> >>>> 3. PR #154 (for JCLOUDS-853) - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?)
> >> >>>> 4. PR #157 - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Regards.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> [1]
> >> >>>>
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> > --
> >> > Francesco Chicchiriccò
> >> >
> >> > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> >> > http://www.tirasa.net/
> >> >
> >> > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
> >> > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Promoting the Azure Compute provider
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org>.
I'll +1 anything that simplifies the provider.
This said, if Azure allows the users to manage networks, we should
suport the TemplateOptions.networks [1] option to let the users create
VMs attached to the desired networks. That option allows users to pass
a list of network IDs where the created nodes will be attached.
Please, open the corresponding JIRAs.
Thx Andrea!
I.
[1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/compute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/compute/options/TemplateOptions.java#L378
On 3 August 2015 at 17:14, Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Francesco, all,
>
> I'd like to share with you some thoughts around azure compute. I've seen
> that using the web GUI to create a Virtual Machine, it does not require to
> create a virtual network upfront. So I tried using jclouds-azurecompute to
> skip the creation of the virtual network so that Azure assigns a Virtual IP
> to the VM automatically. It seems to be ok.
>
> Do you all see any issue if we remove the virtual network creation from the
> GetOrCreateStorageServiceAndVirtualNetworkThenCreateNodes ?
>
> Happy to file a jira issue to track this better, if needed.
>
> Thank,
> Andrea
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:28 AM Bhathiya Supun <hs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Francesco,
>>
>> I have mostly finished re-basing #157 and will open a new PR as soon as we
>> finish with #175
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Bhathiya
>>
>>
>> On 1 June 2015 at 11:15, Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > I see that #154 was "moved" to #171 and again to #175: could anyone
>> please
>> > review?
>> >
>> > #157 seems to have remained steady, instead.
>> >
>> > Is there anything new about Azure Compute provider's promotion out of
>> > labs? Any planned date for JClouds 1.9.1?
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Regards.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 30/04/2015 17:15, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks for bringing this up Francesco,
>> >>
>> >> I've just merged #167, so I'd say we can wait until #154 and #157 are
>> >> merged to promote Azure. #154 should be almost ready, so given that
>> there
>> >> are just a couple structural PRs pending, I'd wait for those and then
>> >> promote the provider.
>> >>
>> >> On 29 April 2015 at 17:05, Bhathiya Supun <hs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Francesco,
>> >>>
>> >>> PR #154 is already rebsed on PR#167 and I will create a new PR by soon.
>> >>> PR#157 got some merge conflicts I'll try to finish rebasing it by
>> Monday.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>>
>> >>> On 29 April 2015 at 12:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgrosso@apache.org
>> >
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi all,
>> >>>> a quick status update on the Azure Compute provider.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As you might know, the Azure Compute provider has
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1. the live test that extends the BaseComputeServiceLiveTest
>> >>>>
>> >>> (JCLOUDS-849)
>> >>>
>> >>>> 2. the live test that extends the BaseTemplateBuilderLiveTest
>> >>>> (JCLOUDS-850)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> with all tests working fine in real Azure subscriptions.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Moreover, since there are free MSDN subscriptions for every ASF
>> >>>> committer
>> >>>> (see [1] for details), such tests are reproducible by others as well.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Question: is anything missing for promoting the Azure Compute provider
>> >>>> from labs? If so, what are next steps?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> FYI, there is still some activity to be completed on this provider,
>> but
>> >>>> I
>> >>>> don't think this is blocking for promotion:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1. PR #168 (for JCLOUDS-839) - merged 9 days ago
>> >>>> 2. PR #167 (for JCLOUDS-852) - should be ready to be merged, after
>> >>>> some
>> >>>> iterations (Ignasi?)
>> >>>> 3. PR #154 (for JCLOUDS-853) - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?)
>> >>>> 4. PR #157 - needs to be rebased (Bhathiya?)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Regards.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [1]
>> >>>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> > --
>> > Francesco Chicchiriccò
>> >
>> > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
>> > http://www.tirasa.net/
>> >
>> > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
>> > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
>> > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>> >
>> >
>>