You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@clerezza.apache.org by Tsuyoshi Ito <ts...@trialox.org> on 2012/01/03 09:42:43 UTC

problems rendering templates because of ZZ-652

Hi Reto

First of all, I wish you a happy New Year. 

I am testing the release you made (btw thanks for the release). I try to render the ssp from the scriptmanager. Unfortunately, an error occurred because of the tag <?xml version='1.0'?> which was added in ZZ-652.

How should we proceed? Should we release without fixing it.

Cheers
Tsuy


Re: problems rendering templates because of ZZ-652

Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
Hi Tsuy,

Yes the problem is the seedsnipe templates had xhtml extension and so they
had an xml-header added, which breaks the resulting xml when the template
is only responsibl for a snipper.

We should add an exclusion for rat.

Cheers,
Reto
On Jan 5, 2012 12:06 PM, "Tsuyoshi Ito" <ts...@trialox.org> wrote:

> Hi Reto
>
> I have fixed it: I have removed the xml header from the seedsnipe
> template. I hope this is ok. When I have time, I will change the templates
> from seedsnipe to ssp.
>
> Cheers
> Tsuy
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
>
> > Hi Tsuy
> >
> > I exchanged the wrong copyright headers but the problem seems to
> > persist. If you happen to have some time looking at it that wuld be
> > great.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > reto
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Hi Tsuy
> >>
> >> Happy new year to you too!
> >>
> >> Yes indeed this xml header and the xml style license header are the
> >> wrong thing in an ssp.
> >>
> >> This is a major bug but I personally think we could release
> >> nevertheless, as the important thing now is to have a first release
> >> and to get used to the process. In future a release should of course
> >> not break existing features.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Reto
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Tsuyoshi Ito <ts...@trialox.org>
> wrote:
> >>> Hi Reto
> >>>
> >>> First of all, I wish you a happy New Year.
> >>>
> >>> I am testing the release you made (btw thanks for the release). I try
> to render the ssp from the scriptmanager. Unfortunately, an error occurred
> because of the tag <?xml version='1.0'?> which was added in ZZ-652.
> >>>
> >>> How should we proceed? Should we release without fixing it.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Tsuy
> >>>
>
> --trialox ag-------------------------------------
>  tsuyoshi ito
>  hardturmstrasse 101
>  8005 zuerich
>
>

Re: problems rendering templates because of ZZ-652

Posted by Tsuyoshi Ito <ts...@trialox.org>.
Hi Reto

I have fixed it: I have removed the xml header from the seedsnipe template. I hope this is ok. When I have time, I will change the templates from seedsnipe to ssp.

Cheers
Tsuy

On Jan 4, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:

> Hi Tsuy
> 
> I exchanged the wrong copyright headers but the problem seems to
> persist. If you happen to have some time looking at it that wuld be
> great.
> 
> Cheers,
> reto
> 
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi Tsuy
>> 
>> Happy new year to you too!
>> 
>> Yes indeed this xml header and the xml style license header are the
>> wrong thing in an ssp.
>> 
>> This is a major bug but I personally think we could release
>> nevertheless, as the important thing now is to have a first release
>> and to get used to the process. In future a release should of course
>> not break existing features.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Tsuyoshi Ito <ts...@trialox.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Reto
>>> 
>>> First of all, I wish you a happy New Year.
>>> 
>>> I am testing the release you made (btw thanks for the release). I try to render the ssp from the scriptmanager. Unfortunately, an error occurred because of the tag <?xml version='1.0'?> which was added in ZZ-652.
>>> 
>>> How should we proceed? Should we release without fixing it.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Tsuy
>>> 

--trialox ag-------------------------------------
  tsuyoshi ito
  hardturmstrasse 101 
  8005 zuerich


Re: problems rendering templates because of ZZ-652

Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
Hi Tsuy

I exchanged the wrong copyright headers but the problem seems to
persist. If you happen to have some time looking at it that wuld be
great.

Cheers,
reto

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Tsuy
>
> Happy new year to you too!
>
> Yes indeed this xml header and the xml style license header are the
> wrong thing in an ssp.
>
> This is a major bug but I personally think we could release
> nevertheless, as the important thing now is to have a first release
> and to get used to the process. In future a release should of course
> not break existing features.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Tsuyoshi Ito <ts...@trialox.org> wrote:
>> Hi Reto
>>
>> First of all, I wish you a happy New Year.
>>
>> I am testing the release you made (btw thanks for the release). I try to render the ssp from the scriptmanager. Unfortunately, an error occurred because of the tag <?xml version='1.0'?> which was added in ZZ-652.
>>
>> How should we proceed? Should we release without fixing it.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Tsuy
>>

Re: problems rendering templates because of ZZ-652

Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
Hi Tsuy

Happy new year to you too!

Yes indeed this xml header and the xml style license header are the
wrong thing in an ssp.

This is a major bug but I personally think we could release
nevertheless, as the important thing now is to have a first release
and to get used to the process. In future a release should of course
not break existing features.

Cheers,
Reto

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Tsuyoshi Ito <ts...@trialox.org> wrote:
> Hi Reto
>
> First of all, I wish you a happy New Year.
>
> I am testing the release you made (btw thanks for the release). I try to render the ssp from the scriptmanager. Unfortunately, an error occurred because of the tag <?xml version='1.0'?> which was added in ZZ-652.
>
> How should we proceed? Should we release without fixing it.
>
> Cheers
> Tsuy
>