You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> on 2016/11/01 17:03:25 UTC
Re: State of 1.3 first RC
Another critical one for your attention sir (patch ready for commit):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16960
Best Regards,
Yu
On 31 October 2016 at 16:59, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Yu,
>
> sorry I missed that and thanks for reaching out. Let me have a look now and
> comment on the jira.
>
> -Mikhail
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think HBASE-16931 is also a critical issue (oops also in compaction
> > area...) and should go in 1.3.0, pinged several times there but failed to
> > draw your attention boss (smile). Mind take a look? Thanks.
> >
> > Btw, is there any ETA for 1.3.0 yet?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> > On 29 October 2016 at 08:17, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > > I've been working on getting the first RC out this week and want to
> share
> > > an update on the current state of the things.
> > >
> > > - HBASE-16951 - was found and fixed, when we don't include
> > > hbase-archetypes in the tarball assembly
> > > - HBASE-16570 - optimization that caused a regression in the balancer,
> > it
> > > was reverted from 1.3. Once fixed that would go to 1.4 and perhaps
> 1.3.1.
> > > - HBASE-16743 - flaky TestSimpleRpcScheduler, fixed now (I ran several
> > > cycles of 50 iterations each and all have passed).
> > >
> > > Now, there's presently one remaining blocker - HBASE-16964, when we
> don't
> > > properly handle archiving of store files after compactions (thanks Gary
> > for
> > > digging into that!).
> > > See the jira for details.
> > >
> > > Also, as a note - the above is a third major bug around compactions
> that
> > we
> > > saw on 1.3 during our testing last month (see also HBASE-16788
> > > and HBASE-16754)..
> > > So during the upcoming RC testing let's try to stress this area.
> > >
> > > Until 1.3 is out let's consider branch-1.3 to be in a lockdown for new
> > > changes. Ping me if you think there is something that I'm missing that
> > > should go out in 1.3. Otherwise,
> > > important but non-blocker fixes in flight would go in 1.3.1.
> > >
> > > Stay tuned!
> > > Mikhail
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Michael Antonov
>
Re: State of 1.3 first RC
Posted by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>.
Have committed HBASE-16960 today, FYI @Mikhail
Looking forward to the 1st RC (Smile)
Best Regards,
Yu
On 4 November 2016 at 06:09, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All rights guys, thanks for the pings and patience! Status update:
>
> - all patches listed in the first email on the thread have been committed
> - in addition to those following fixes will go in (good catches!)
> * HBASE-16931 Setting cell's seqId to zero in compaction flow might
> cause RS down (committed)
> * HBASE-16960 RegionServer hang when aborting (committed to master and
> branch-1, pending commit to branch-1.3).
>
> With that I'm planning to prepare the RC. The other patches pinged upon
> would be in 1.3.1 or 1.4.0.
> Speak up if I missed some pending fixes you consider critical.
>
> Thanks!
> -Mikhail
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Looking - thanks!
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Another critical one for your attention sir (patch ready for commit):
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16960
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Yu
> >>
> >> On 31 October 2016 at 16:59, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Yu,
> >> >
> >> > sorry I missed that and thanks for reaching out. Let me have a look
> now
> >> and
> >> > comment on the jira.
> >> >
> >> > -Mikhail
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I think HBASE-16931 is also a critical issue (oops also in
> compaction
> >> > > area...) and should go in 1.3.0, pinged several times there but
> >> failed to
> >> > > draw your attention boss (smile). Mind take a look? Thanks.
> >> > >
> >> > > Btw, is there any ETA for 1.3.0 yet?
> >> > >
> >> > > Best Regards,
> >> > > Yu
> >> > >
> >> > > On 29 October 2016 at 08:17, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Guys,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I've been working on getting the first RC out this week and want
> to
> >> > share
> >> > > > an update on the current state of the things.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - HBASE-16951 - was found and fixed, when we don't include
> >> > > > hbase-archetypes in the tarball assembly
> >> > > > - HBASE-16570 - optimization that caused a regression in the
> >> balancer,
> >> > > it
> >> > > > was reverted from 1.3. Once fixed that would go to 1.4 and perhaps
> >> > 1.3.1.
> >> > > > - HBASE-16743 - flaky TestSimpleRpcScheduler, fixed now (I ran
> >> several
> >> > > > cycles of 50 iterations each and all have passed).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Now, there's presently one remaining blocker - HBASE-16964, when
> we
> >> > don't
> >> > > > properly handle archiving of store files after compactions (thanks
> >> Gary
> >> > > for
> >> > > > digging into that!).
> >> > > > See the jira for details.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Also, as a note - the above is a third major bug around
> compactions
> >> > that
> >> > > we
> >> > > > saw on 1.3 during our testing last month (see also HBASE-16788
> >> > > > and HBASE-16754)..
> >> > > > So during the upcoming RC testing let's try to stress this area.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Until 1.3 is out let's consider branch-1.3 to be in a lockdown for
> >> new
> >> > > > changes. Ping me if you think there is something that I'm missing
> >> that
> >> > > > should go out in 1.3. Otherwise,
> >> > > > important but non-blocker fixes in flight would go in 1.3.1.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Stay tuned!
> >> > > > Mikhail
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Michael Antonov
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Michael Antonov
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Michael Antonov
>
Re: State of 1.3 first RC
Posted by Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>.
All rights guys, thanks for the pings and patience! Status update:
- all patches listed in the first email on the thread have been committed
- in addition to those following fixes will go in (good catches!)
* HBASE-16931 Setting cell's seqId to zero in compaction flow might
cause RS down (committed)
* HBASE-16960 RegionServer hang when aborting (committed to master and
branch-1, pending commit to branch-1.3).
With that I'm planning to prepare the RC. The other patches pinged upon
would be in 1.3.1 or 1.4.0.
Speak up if I missed some pending fixes you consider critical.
Thanks!
-Mikhail
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Looking - thanks!
>
> -M
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Another critical one for your attention sir (patch ready for commit):
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16960
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Yu
>>
>> On 31 October 2016 at 16:59, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Yu,
>> >
>> > sorry I missed that and thanks for reaching out. Let me have a look now
>> and
>> > comment on the jira.
>> >
>> > -Mikhail
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think HBASE-16931 is also a critical issue (oops also in compaction
>> > > area...) and should go in 1.3.0, pinged several times there but
>> failed to
>> > > draw your attention boss (smile). Mind take a look? Thanks.
>> > >
>> > > Btw, is there any ETA for 1.3.0 yet?
>> > >
>> > > Best Regards,
>> > > Yu
>> > >
>> > > On 29 October 2016 at 08:17, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Guys,
>> > > >
>> > > > I've been working on getting the first RC out this week and want to
>> > share
>> > > > an update on the current state of the things.
>> > > >
>> > > > - HBASE-16951 - was found and fixed, when we don't include
>> > > > hbase-archetypes in the tarball assembly
>> > > > - HBASE-16570 - optimization that caused a regression in the
>> balancer,
>> > > it
>> > > > was reverted from 1.3. Once fixed that would go to 1.4 and perhaps
>> > 1.3.1.
>> > > > - HBASE-16743 - flaky TestSimpleRpcScheduler, fixed now (I ran
>> several
>> > > > cycles of 50 iterations each and all have passed).
>> > > >
>> > > > Now, there's presently one remaining blocker - HBASE-16964, when we
>> > don't
>> > > > properly handle archiving of store files after compactions (thanks
>> Gary
>> > > for
>> > > > digging into that!).
>> > > > See the jira for details.
>> > > >
>> > > > Also, as a note - the above is a third major bug around compactions
>> > that
>> > > we
>> > > > saw on 1.3 during our testing last month (see also HBASE-16788
>> > > > and HBASE-16754)..
>> > > > So during the upcoming RC testing let's try to stress this area.
>> > > >
>> > > > Until 1.3 is out let's consider branch-1.3 to be in a lockdown for
>> new
>> > > > changes. Ping me if you think there is something that I'm missing
>> that
>> > > > should go out in 1.3. Otherwise,
>> > > > important but non-blocker fixes in flight would go in 1.3.1.
>> > > >
>> > > > Stay tuned!
>> > > > Mikhail
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks,
>> > Michael Antonov
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Michael Antonov
>
--
Thanks,
Michael Antonov
Re: State of 1.3 first RC
Posted by Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>.
Looking - thanks!
-M
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Another critical one for your attention sir (patch ready for commit):
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16960
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> On 31 October 2016 at 16:59, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Yu,
> >
> > sorry I missed that and thanks for reaching out. Let me have a look now
> and
> > comment on the jira.
> >
> > -Mikhail
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I think HBASE-16931 is also a critical issue (oops also in compaction
> > > area...) and should go in 1.3.0, pinged several times there but failed
> to
> > > draw your attention boss (smile). Mind take a look? Thanks.
> > >
> > > Btw, is there any ETA for 1.3.0 yet?
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Yu
> > >
> > > On 29 October 2016 at 08:17, Mikhail Antonov <ol...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Guys,
> > > >
> > > > I've been working on getting the first RC out this week and want to
> > share
> > > > an update on the current state of the things.
> > > >
> > > > - HBASE-16951 - was found and fixed, when we don't include
> > > > hbase-archetypes in the tarball assembly
> > > > - HBASE-16570 - optimization that caused a regression in the
> balancer,
> > > it
> > > > was reverted from 1.3. Once fixed that would go to 1.4 and perhaps
> > 1.3.1.
> > > > - HBASE-16743 - flaky TestSimpleRpcScheduler, fixed now (I ran
> several
> > > > cycles of 50 iterations each and all have passed).
> > > >
> > > > Now, there's presently one remaining blocker - HBASE-16964, when we
> > don't
> > > > properly handle archiving of store files after compactions (thanks
> Gary
> > > for
> > > > digging into that!).
> > > > See the jira for details.
> > > >
> > > > Also, as a note - the above is a third major bug around compactions
> > that
> > > we
> > > > saw on 1.3 during our testing last month (see also HBASE-16788
> > > > and HBASE-16754)..
> > > > So during the upcoming RC testing let's try to stress this area.
> > > >
> > > > Until 1.3 is out let's consider branch-1.3 to be in a lockdown for
> new
> > > > changes. Ping me if you think there is something that I'm missing
> that
> > > > should go out in 1.3. Otherwise,
> > > > important but non-blocker fixes in flight would go in 1.3.1.
> > > >
> > > > Stay tuned!
> > > > Mikhail
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Michael Antonov
> >
>
--
Thanks,
Michael Antonov