You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> on 2013/11/29 09:03:45 UTC

Sling Replication IP Clearance

Hi all,

I just published the IP Clearance page for Sling Replication [1][2].
Please have a look and let me know if you think anything is wrong /
missing, then I'll open the lazy consensus vote on general@incubator.a.o

Thanks and regards,
Tommaso

[1] : http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-replication.html
[2] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3254

Re: Sling Replication IP Clearance

Posted by Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com>.
LGTM

Thanks
Felix

—
Felix Meschberger  |  Principal Scientist  |  Adobe



Am 29.11.2013 um 09:03 schrieb Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>:

> Hi all,
> 
> I just published the IP Clearance page for Sling Replication [1][2].
> Please have a look and let me know if you think anything is wrong /
> missing, then I'll open the lazy consensus vote on general@incubator.a.o
> 
> Thanks and regards,
> Tommaso
> 
> [1] : http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-replication.html
> [2] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3254

Re: Sling Replication IP Clearance

Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
Great, Thanks Bertrand!

Ciao,
Tommaso


2013/12/3 Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>

> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Tommaso Teofili
> <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ...I think we're good to go now for committing the patch in SLING-3223...
>
> Thanks very much, I've committed the SLING-3223 patch, made minor
> changes (details in the issue) and resolved that issue.
>
> Ciao,
> -Bertrand
>

Re: Sling Replication IP Clearance

Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...I think we're good to go now for committing the patch in SLING-3223...

Thanks very much, I've committed the SLING-3223 patch, made minor
changes (details in the issue) and resolved that issue.

Ciao,
-Bertrand

Re: Sling Replication IP Clearance

Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
The vote on general@ for Sling Replication has passed [1].
I think we're good to go now for committing the patch in SLING-3223.
Regards,
Tommaso

[1] : http://markmail.org/thread/q3odwcdmw6ak5yui


2013/11/29 Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>

> Hi Bertrand,
>
> 2013/11/29 Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Tommaso Teofili
>> <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > ...[1] :
>> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-replication.html ...
>>
>> Looks good to me except links to votes which should point to
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/ - that information needs to be
>> permanent, which markmail is not from our point of view.
>>
>> You'll probably want to use s.apache.org variants as the original ones
>> are not really concise ;-)
>>
>
> good point, I've fixed the links as per your suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> Tommaso
>
>
>
>>
>> -Bertrand
>>
>
>

Re: Sling Replication IP Clearance

Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi Bertrand,

2013/11/29 Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>

> Hi,
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Tommaso Teofili
> <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ...[1] : http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-replication.html...
>
> Looks good to me except links to votes which should point to
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/ - that information needs to be
> permanent, which markmail is not from our point of view.
>
> You'll probably want to use s.apache.org variants as the original ones
> are not really concise ;-)
>

good point, I've fixed the links as per your suggestions.

Thanks,
Tommaso



>
> -Bertrand
>

Re: Sling Replication IP Clearance

Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,


On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...[1] : http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-replication.html ...

Looks good to me except links to votes which should point to
http://mail-archives.apache.org/ - that information needs to be
permanent, which markmail is not from our point of view.

You'll probably want to use s.apache.org variants as the original ones
are not really concise ;-)

-Bertrand