You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by Lucien GENTIS <lu...@lorraine.iufm.fr> on 2007/07/22 14:57:21 UTC
little error
Greetings to all,
In http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/en/glossary.html :
Definition of Transport Layer Security says :
"TLS version 1 and is nearly identical with SSL version 3."
Wouldn't it be "TLS version 1 is nearly identical with SSL version 3." ?
Best Regards,
Lucien Gentis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: little error
Posted by Vincent Bray <no...@gmail.com>.
On 24/07/07, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> There's no policy on this. It's merely a function of the fact that
> we're a volunteer organization, and people work on the stuff that we
> care about. Consequently, the 1.3 docs have become more and more
> abandoned, with only occasional serious errors being fixed in that
> branch. If you want to backport doc patches, you are very welcome to
> do so. There are still millions of servers running the 1.3 code, and
> so presumably lots of folks still need the 1.3 docs.
>
> I've tried to remember to patch the 2.0 docs when I patch the 2.2 and
> trunk docs, but it doesn't always happen. 2.0 is still very
> important, with lots of people having made the jump to 2.0 but not
> feeling quite confident enough to move to 2.2.
>
> --
> Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
> you do it.
> Mahatma Ghandi
What an astute .sig, serendipity?
I pondered today if there's also a function involved here in making
the next major release sufficiently better, by not backporting trivial
changes. Perhaps that's less of an issue with the docs.
--
noodl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: little error
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
On Jul 22, 2007, at 10:33, Vincent Bray wrote:
> On 22/07/07, Vincent Bray <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Fixed in trunk and 2.2, thanks. Looks like somebody beat me to it
>> with 2.0 :-)
>
> Ok, so I wasn't beaten too it, I just had another mislabeled WC for
> 2.2. I've committed this to 2.0 too now, but I should ask the list...
>
> Is there a policy on maintaining the 2.0 branch docs now? The previous
> commit to them was 2 months ago and several updates seem to have been
> directed only at 2.2 and trunk in that time.
>
> I presume the 1.3 docs are considered dead but not burried?
There's no policy on this. It's merely a function of the fact that
we're a volunteer organization, and people work on the stuff that we
care about. Consequently, the 1.3 docs have become more and more
abandoned, with only occasional serious errors being fixed in that
branch. If you want to backport doc patches, you are very welcome to
do so. There are still millions of servers running the 1.3 code, and
so presumably lots of folks still need the 1.3 docs.
I've tried to remember to patch the 2.0 docs when I patch the 2.2 and
trunk docs, but it doesn't always happen. 2.0 is still very
important, with lots of people having made the jump to 2.0 but not
feeling quite confident enough to move to 2.2.
--
Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
you do it.
Mahatma Ghandi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: little error
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
On 7/22/07, Vincent Bray <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22/07/07, Vincent Bray <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Fixed in trunk and 2.2, thanks. Looks like somebody beat me to it with 2.0 :-)
>
> Ok, so I wasn't beaten too it, I just had another mislabeled WC for
> 2.2. I've committed this to 2.0 too now, but I should ask the list...
>
> Is there a policy on maintaining the 2.0 branch docs now? The previous
> commit to them was 2 months ago and several updates seem to have been
> directed only at 2.2 and trunk in that time.
>
> I presume the 1.3 docs are considered dead but not burried?
There's no specific policy. I personally find that committing at least
4 files for a simple typo fix (xml/html in trunk and xml/html in 2.2)
is as much work as I want to do. But if others want to backport
further, I have no objection at all. I do try to push major errors and
security notes all the way back to 1.3.
Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: little error
Posted by Vincent Bray <no...@gmail.com>.
On 22/07/07, Vincent Bray <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fixed in trunk and 2.2, thanks. Looks like somebody beat me to it with 2.0 :-)
Ok, so I wasn't beaten too it, I just had another mislabeled WC for
2.2. I've committed this to 2.0 too now, but I should ask the list...
Is there a policy on maintaining the 2.0 branch docs now? The previous
commit to them was 2 months ago and several updates seem to have been
directed only at 2.2 and trunk in that time.
I presume the 1.3 docs are considered dead but not burried?
--
noodl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: little error
Posted by Vincent Bray <no...@gmail.com>.
On 22/07/07, Lucien GENTIS <lu...@lorraine.iufm.fr> wrote:
> Greetings to all,
>
> In http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/en/glossary.html :
>
> Definition of Transport Layer Security says :
> "TLS version 1 and is nearly identical with SSL version 3."
>
> Wouldn't it be "TLS version 1 is nearly identical with SSL version 3." ?
Fixed in trunk and 2.2, thanks. Looks like somebody beat me to it with 2.0 :-)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=558483
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=558484
--
noodl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org