You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/01/19 11:35:12 UTC

[GitHub] [maven-compiler-plugin] psiroky commented on a diff in pull request #169: [MCOMPILER-522] Use maven-resolver to resolve 'annotationProcessorPaths' dependencies

psiroky commented on code in PR #169:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-compiler-plugin/pull/169#discussion_r1081140364


##########
src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/compiler/AbstractCompilerMojo.java:
##########
@@ -1814,29 +1810,26 @@ private List<String> resolveProcessorPathEntries()
                 ArtifactHandler handler = artifactHandlerManager.getArtifactHandler( coord.getType() );
 
                 Artifact artifact = new DefaultArtifact(
-                     coord.getGroupId(),
-                     coord.getArtifactId(),
-                     VersionRange.createFromVersionSpec( coord.getVersion() ),
-                     Artifact.SCOPE_RUNTIME,
-                     coord.getType(),
-                     coord.getClassifier(),
-                     handler,
-                     false );
-
-                ArtifactResolutionRequest request = new ArtifactResolutionRequest()
-                                .setArtifact( artifact )
-                                .setResolveRoot( true )
-                                .setResolveTransitively( true )
-                                .setLocalRepository( session.getLocalRepository() )
-                                .setRemoteRepositories( project.getRemoteArtifactRepositories() );
-
-                ArtifactResolutionResult resolutionResult = repositorySystem.resolve( request );
-
-                resolutionErrorHandler.throwErrors( request, resolutionResult );
-
-                for ( Artifact resolved : resolutionResult.getArtifacts() )
+                        coord.getGroupId(),
+                        coord.getArtifactId(),
+                        coord.getClassifier(),
+                        handler.getExtension(),
+                        coord.getVersion()
+                );
+
+                CollectRequest collectRequest = new CollectRequest( new Dependency( artifact, JavaScopes.RUNTIME ),
+                        project.getRemoteProjectRepositories() );
+                DependencyRequest dependencyRequest = new DependencyRequest();
+                dependencyRequest.setCollectRequest( collectRequest );
+                DependencyResult dependencyResult = repositorySystem.resolveDependencies(
+                        session.getRepositorySession(), dependencyRequest );
+
+                for ( ArtifactResult resolved : dependencyResult.getArtifactResults() )
                 {
-                    elements.add( resolved.getFile().getAbsolutePath() );
+                    if ( resolved.getArtifact() != null && resolved.getArtifact().getFile() != null )
+                    {
+                        elements.add( resolved.getArtifact().getFile().getAbsolutePath() );
+                    }

Review Comment:
   Not sure about this. I assume the artifact, nor the path should be null if the resolving is successful. However, if we explicitly check, maybe we should throw an exception in the `else` branch? Otherwise we would just not include on of the dependencies without any kind of message to the user.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org