You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2009/05/17 21:03:33 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47209] New: Color Filter rule level==info broken

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209

           Summary: Color Filter rule level==info broken
           Product: Log4j
           Version: 1.2
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: chainsaw
        AssignedTo: log4j-dev@logging.apache.org
        ReportedBy: hammy_the_man@hotmail.com


For java.util.logging format files, it would be common to add:

level==severe
level==warning
level==info
level==config
level==fine
level==finer
level==finest

Strangely level==info does not apply the color correctly. I then tried creating
a rule for 
level!=info and it successfully highlights all other than those I want.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47209] Color Filter rule level==info broken

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209


Scott Deboy <sd...@iname.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




--- Comment #1 from Scott Deboy <sd...@iname.com>  2009-05-20 09:19:26 PST ---
Fix committed in svn r776752 ( https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&rev=776752 ) - also added support for !=

log4j devs: One issue I noticed...the UtilLoggingLevel class is in extras and
receivers....I only updated the version in receivers...I don't think the one in
extras is needed, is it?  If so, we should move this version from receivers
over to extras..

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org