You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Daniel Watford <da...@foomoo.co.uk> on 2022/12/16 09:12:45 UTC
OFBiz 21.01 releases
Hello,
The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases for
18.12.
Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
downloadable from the ofbiz website?
Thanks,
Dan
--
Daniel Watford
https://watfordconsulting.com
<https://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/n2QFCVVyf2vLXvhGoNoa/>
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Michael Brohl <mi...@ecomify.de>.
Hi Dan,
remark: it will be an 22.01 release, not 21.01. We have created the
branch at the beginning of this year.
Stable branches generally only receive bug fixes and - if the community
agrees - non-breaking small features. So yes.
Best regards,
Michael
Am 16.12.22 um 10:58 schrieb Daniel Watford:
> Thanks, Jacques.
>
> If 21.01 is coming soon, does that mean we have a feature freeze in place -
> i.e. we should only commit bug fixes or agreed features to the 21.01 branch
> in order to stablise the release?
>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 at 09:30, Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Not yet, but it should be "soon" (ie in few weeks), hopefully using JDK 17
>> and Gradle 7.6...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Le 16/12/2022 à 10:12, Daniel Watford a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases
>> for
>>> 18.12.
>>>
>>> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
>>> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Daniel Watford <da...@foomoo.co.uk>.
Thanks, Jacques.
If 21.01 is coming soon, does that mean we have a feature freeze in place -
i.e. we should only commit bug fixes or agreed features to the 21.01 branch
in order to stablise the release?
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 at 09:30, Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Not yet, but it should be "soon" (ie in few weeks), hopefully using JDK 17
> and Gradle 7.6...
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 16/12/2022 à 10:12, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases
> for
> > 18.12.
> >
> > Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
> > downloadable from the ofbiz website?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dan
> >
>
--
Daniel Watford
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Hi Daniel,
Not yet, but it should be "soon" (ie in few weeks), hopefully using JDK 17 and Gradle 7.6...
Jacques
Le 16/12/2022 à 10:12, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases for
> 18.12.
>
> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Le 21/12/2022 à 12:33, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> The workaround is easy, the rest I doubt. Like this comment at top of GenericEntity.java
To be clear the issue I fixed with the workaround is about immutability
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Le 21/12/2022 à 12:33, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> The workaround is easy, the rest I doubt. Like this comment at top of GenericEntity.java
>
> /** Contains the fields for this entity. Note that this should always be a
> * HashMap to allow for two things: non-synchronized reads (synchronized
> * writes are done through synchronized setters) and being able to store
> * null values. Null values are important because with them we can distinguish
> * between desiring to set a value to null and desiring to not modify the
> * current value on an update.
> */
> private Map<String, Object> fields = new HashMap<>();
>
> There are certainly solutions but I guess not as easy as the workaround.
To be more clear the issue I fixed with the workaround is about immutability
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Hi Daniel,
I was considering to commit in trunk because of the pending changes I have for OFBIZ-12721 "Replace all occurrences of java.util.TimeZone by
java.time.ZoneId" and this one.
But I finally decided not. I can live with it until we decide to run under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17. I do and had no issues for a month before running
integration tests.
The workaround is easy, the rest I doubt. Like this comment at top of GenericEntity.java
/** Contains the fields for this entity. Note that this should always be a
* HashMap to allow for two things: non-synchronized reads (synchronized
* writes are done through synchronized setters) and being able to store
* null values. Null values are important because with them we can distinguish
* between desiring to set a value to null and desiring to not modify the
* current value on an update.
*/
private Map<String, Object> fields = new HashMap<>();
There are certainly solutions but I guess not as easy as the workaround.
Also, I'm not much worried, but as we know JDK 11 will no longer be supported without paying in 2023. Could be an issue for prospects or even clients.
Last but not least, I'd like to run the demos under Gradle 7.6 and JDK 17. I'm confident it should work after running the tests. That would accelerate
things (more free testing)...
Jacques
Le 21/12/2022 à 12:09, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> Hi Jacques,
>
> Will you be committing your fix/workaround under OFBIZ-12726?
>
> If this change goes in to the code perhaps we should consider it a stop-gap
> to unblock moving OFBiz to JDK 17 as it seems to go again the spirit of
> strong encapsulation described in the migration guide you linked to: Migrating
> From JDK 8 to Later JDK Releases (oracle.com)
> <https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/migrate/migrating-jdk-8-later-jdk-releases.html#GUID-7BB28E4D-99B3-4078-BDC4-FC24180CE82B>.
> I do support the workaround though as otherwise our option is to remain on
> older JDKs for the time being.
>
> We should probably have an aim to remove the workaround in a future
> release to try and bring ofbiz into compliance with JDK encapsulation - but
> this could be a 'back burner' task.
>
> Dan.
>
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 10:23, Jacques Le Roux<ja...@les7arts.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I closed OFBIZ-12726 as fixed.
>>
>> Fortunately, simply adding --add-opens=java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED
>> into applicationDefaultJvmArgs in build.gradle fixed the whole issues.
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Le 20/12/2022 à 12:28, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>> I have createdhttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12726 for
>> that
>>> Le 20/12/2022 à 12:22, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>>> Yes of course, it's a "typo" :)
>>>>
>>>> Le 20/12/2022 à 12:02, Michael Brohl a écrit :
>>>>> You are confusing me, Jacques.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no release 20.01.01, its 22.01.01, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Brohl
>>>>>
>>>>> ecomify GmbH -www.ecomify.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 20.12.22 um 11:55 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>>>>>> You are right, confident as all seamed to go well running OFBiz, I
>> did not ran integration tests yet
>>>>>> There is a lot of work to do regarding those. Currently we have 322
>> errors and 190 failures.
>>>>>> I'm still confident that it should not be as hard as it looks to fix,
>> but indeed that could maybe take several weeks.
>>>>>> So releasing 20.01.01 with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, seems indeed a bit
>> early.
>>>>>> In order to accelerate releasing 20.01.02, or next, with gradle 7.6
>> and JDK 17, I suggest to run the demos with them.
>>>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 20/12/2022 à 09:33, Michael Brohl a écrit :
>>>>>>> In my opinion, before we do a RELEASE based on a new JDK (doing a
>> step from 8 to 17), we should have some serious testing with different
>>>>>>> environments etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's only a few weeks since the change which is much different from
>> the long stabilization phases we had in the past.
>>>>>>> How can we organize this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michael Brohl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ecomify GmbH -www.ecomify.de
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PS: we could do some testing on Mac and Ubuntu but it will take some
>> time
>>>>>>> Am 20.12.22 um 07:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK
>> 17 without any problems.
>>>>>>>> For that, we have OFBIZ-12400 "Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk
>> 11 -> 17" with 2 minor subtasks open.
>>>>>>>> I suggest that you also test on your side in order to allow to
>> release the 22.01.01 version with this configuration.
>>>>>>>> TIA
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le 19/12/2022 à 14:13, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> Yeah,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm agree for the 22.01,
>>>>>>>>> I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work
>> on the new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the next :)
>>>>>>>>> Nicolas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further
>> releases for
>>>>>>>>>> 18.12.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should
>> they be
>>>>>>>>>> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Daniel Watford <da...@foomoo.co.uk>.
Hi Jacques,
Will you be committing your fix/workaround under OFBIZ-12726?
If this change goes in to the code perhaps we should consider it a stop-gap
to unblock moving OFBiz to JDK 17 as it seems to go again the spirit of
strong encapsulation described in the migration guide you linked to: Migrating
From JDK 8 to Later JDK Releases (oracle.com)
<https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/migrate/migrating-jdk-8-later-jdk-releases.html#GUID-7BB28E4D-99B3-4078-BDC4-FC24180CE82B>.
I do support the workaround though as otherwise our option is to remain on
older JDKs for the time being.
We should probably have an aim to remove the workaround in a future
release to try and bring ofbiz into compliance with JDK encapsulation - but
this could be a 'back burner' task.
Dan.
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 10:23, Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I closed OFBIZ-12726 as fixed.
>
> Fortunately, simply adding --add-opens=java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED
> into applicationDefaultJvmArgs in build.gradle fixed the whole issues.
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 20/12/2022 à 12:28, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> > I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12726 for
> that
> >
> > Le 20/12/2022 à 12:22, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> >> Yes of course, it's a "typo" :)
> >>
> >> Le 20/12/2022 à 12:02, Michael Brohl a écrit :
> >>> You are confusing me, Jacques.
> >>>
> >>> There is no release 20.01.01, its 22.01.01, right?
> >>>
> >>> Michael Brohl
> >>>
> >>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am 20.12.22 um 11:55 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> >>>> You are right, confident as all seamed to go well running OFBiz, I
> did not ran integration tests yet
> >>>>
> >>>> There is a lot of work to do regarding those. Currently we have 322
> errors and 190 failures.
> >>>> I'm still confident that it should not be as hard as it looks to fix,
> but indeed that could maybe take several weeks.
> >>>>
> >>>> So releasing 20.01.01 with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, seems indeed a bit
> early.
> >>>>
> >>>> In order to accelerate releasing 20.01.02, or next, with gradle 7.6
> and JDK 17, I suggest to run the demos with them.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you guys think?
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacques
> >>>>
> >>>> Le 20/12/2022 à 09:33, Michael Brohl a écrit :
> >>>>> In my opinion, before we do a RELEASE based on a new JDK (doing a
> step from 8 to 17), we should have some serious testing with different
> >>>>> environments etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's only a few weeks since the change which is much different from
> the long stabilization phases we had in the past.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How can we organize this?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Michael Brohl
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PS: we could do some testing on Mac and Ubuntu but it will take some
> time
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am 20.12.22 um 07:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> >>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK
> 17 without any problems.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For that, we have OFBIZ-12400 "Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk
> 11 -> 17" with 2 minor subtasks open.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I suggest that you also test on your side in order to allow to
> release the 22.01.01 version with this configuration.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> TIA
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jacques
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Le 19/12/2022 à 14:13, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
> >>>>>>> Yeah,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm agree for the 22.01,
> >>>>>>> I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work
> on the new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the next :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Nicolas
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further
> releases for
> >>>>>>>> 18.12.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should
> they be
> >>>>>>>> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Dan
> >>>>>>>>
>
--
Daniel Watford
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Hi,
I closed OFBIZ-12726 as fixed.
Fortunately, simply adding --add-opens=java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED into applicationDefaultJvmArgs in build.gradle fixed the whole issues.
Jacques
Le 20/12/2022 à 12:28, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12726 for that
>
> Le 20/12/2022 à 12:22, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> Yes of course, it's a "typo" :)
>>
>> Le 20/12/2022 à 12:02, Michael Brohl a écrit :
>>> You are confusing me, Jacques.
>>>
>>> There is no release 20.01.01, its 22.01.01, right?
>>>
>>> Michael Brohl
>>>
>>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 20.12.22 um 11:55 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>>>> You are right, confident as all seamed to go well running OFBiz, I did not ran integration tests yet
>>>>
>>>> There is a lot of work to do regarding those. Currently we have 322 errors and 190 failures.
>>>> I'm still confident that it should not be as hard as it looks to fix, but indeed that could maybe take several weeks.
>>>>
>>>> So releasing 20.01.01 with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, seems indeed a bit early.
>>>>
>>>> In order to accelerate releasing 20.01.02, or next, with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, I suggest to run the demos with them.
>>>>
>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> Le 20/12/2022 à 09:33, Michael Brohl a écrit :
>>>>> In my opinion, before we do a RELEASE based on a new JDK (doing a step from 8 to 17), we should have some serious testing with different
>>>>> environments etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's only a few weeks since the change which is much different from the long stabilization phases we had in the past.
>>>>>
>>>>> How can we organize this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Brohl
>>>>>
>>>>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: we could do some testing on Mac and Ubuntu but it will take some time
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 20.12.22 um 07:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK 17 without any problems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For that, we have OFBIZ-12400 "Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk 11 -> 17" with 2 minor subtasks open.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suggest that you also test on your side in order to allow to release the 22.01.01 version with this configuration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TIA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 19/12/2022 à 14:13, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>>>>>>> Yeah,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm agree for the 22.01,
>>>>>>> I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work on the new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the next :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nicolas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases for
>>>>>>>> 18.12.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
>>>>>>>> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12726 for that
Le 20/12/2022 à 12:22, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Yes of course, it's a "typo" :)
>
> Le 20/12/2022 à 12:02, Michael Brohl a écrit :
>> You are confusing me, Jacques.
>>
>> There is no release 20.01.01, its 22.01.01, right?
>>
>> Michael Brohl
>>
>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>>
>>
>> Am 20.12.22 um 11:55 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>>> You are right, confident as all seamed to go well running OFBiz, I did not ran integration tests yet
>>>
>>> There is a lot of work to do regarding those. Currently we have 322 errors and 190 failures.
>>> I'm still confident that it should not be as hard as it looks to fix, but indeed that could maybe take several weeks.
>>>
>>> So releasing 20.01.01 with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, seems indeed a bit early.
>>>
>>> In order to accelerate releasing 20.01.02, or next, with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, I suggest to run the demos with them.
>>>
>>> What do you guys think?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Le 20/12/2022 à 09:33, Michael Brohl a écrit :
>>>> In my opinion, before we do a RELEASE based on a new JDK (doing a step from 8 to 17), we should have some serious testing with different
>>>> environments etc.
>>>>
>>>> It's only a few weeks since the change which is much different from the long stabilization phases we had in the past.
>>>>
>>>> How can we organize this?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Michael Brohl
>>>>
>>>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PS: we could do some testing on Mac and Ubuntu but it will take some time
>>>>
>>>> Am 20.12.22 um 07:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK 17 without any problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> For that, we have OFBIZ-12400 "Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk 11 -> 17" with 2 minor subtasks open.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest that you also test on your side in order to allow to release the 22.01.01 version with this configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>> TIA
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 19/12/2022 à 14:13, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>>>>>> Yeah,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm agree for the 22.01,
>>>>>> I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work on the new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the next :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nicolas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases for
>>>>>>> 18.12.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
>>>>>>> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Yes of course, it's a "typo" :)
Le 20/12/2022 à 12:02, Michael Brohl a écrit :
> You are confusing me, Jacques.
>
> There is no release 20.01.01, its 22.01.01, right?
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
>
> Am 20.12.22 um 11:55 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>> You are right, confident as all seamed to go well running OFBiz, I did not ran integration tests yet
>>
>> There is a lot of work to do regarding those. Currently we have 322 errors and 190 failures.
>> I'm still confident that it should not be as hard as it looks to fix, but indeed that could maybe take several weeks.
>>
>> So releasing 20.01.01 with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, seems indeed a bit early.
>>
>> In order to accelerate releasing 20.01.02, or next, with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, I suggest to run the demos with them.
>>
>> What do you guys think?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Le 20/12/2022 à 09:33, Michael Brohl a écrit :
>>> In my opinion, before we do a RELEASE based on a new JDK (doing a step from 8 to 17), we should have some serious testing with different
>>> environments etc.
>>>
>>> It's only a few weeks since the change which is much different from the long stabilization phases we had in the past.
>>>
>>> How can we organize this?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Michael Brohl
>>>
>>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>>>
>>>
>>> PS: we could do some testing on Mac and Ubuntu but it will take some time
>>>
>>> Am 20.12.22 um 07:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK 17 without any problems.
>>>>
>>>> For that, we have OFBIZ-12400 "Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk 11 -> 17" with 2 minor subtasks open.
>>>>
>>>> I suggest that you also test on your side in order to allow to release the 22.01.01 version with this configuration.
>>>>
>>>> TIA
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> Le 19/12/2022 à 14:13, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>>>>> Yeah,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm agree for the 22.01,
>>>>> I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work on the new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the next :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Nicolas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases for
>>>>>> 18.12.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
>>>>>> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Michael Brohl <mi...@ecomify.de>.
You are confusing me, Jacques.
There is no release 20.01.01, its 22.01.01, right?
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 20.12.22 um 11:55 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> You are right, confident as all seamed to go well running OFBiz, I did
> not ran integration tests yet
>
> There is a lot of work to do regarding those. Currently we have 322
> errors and 190 failures.
> I'm still confident that it should not be as hard as it looks to fix,
> but indeed that could maybe take several weeks.
>
> So releasing 20.01.01 with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, seems indeed a bit
> early.
>
> In order to accelerate releasing 20.01.02, or next, with gradle 7.6
> and JDK 17, I suggest to run the demos with them.
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 20/12/2022 à 09:33, Michael Brohl a écrit :
>> In my opinion, before we do a RELEASE based on a new JDK (doing a
>> step from 8 to 17), we should have some serious testing with
>> different environments etc.
>>
>> It's only a few weeks since the change which is much different from
>> the long stabilization phases we had in the past.
>>
>> How can we organize this?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Michael Brohl
>>
>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>>
>>
>> PS: we could do some testing on Mac and Ubuntu but it will take some
>> time
>>
>> Am 20.12.22 um 07:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK 17
>>> without any problems.
>>>
>>> For that, we have OFBIZ-12400 "Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk
>>> 11 -> 17" with 2 minor subtasks open.
>>>
>>> I suggest that you also test on your side in order to allow to
>>> release the 22.01.01 version with this configuration.
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Le 19/12/2022 à 14:13, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>>>> Yeah,
>>>>
>>>> I'm agree for the 22.01,
>>>> I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work
>>>> on the new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the
>>>> next :)
>>>>
>>>> Nicolas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further
>>>>> releases for
>>>>> 18.12.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should
>>>>> they be
>>>>> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
You are right, confident as all seamed to go well running OFBiz, I did not ran integration tests yet
There is a lot of work to do regarding those. Currently we have 322 errors and 190 failures.
I'm still confident that it should not be as hard as it looks to fix, but indeed that could maybe take several weeks.
So releasing 20.01.01 with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, seems indeed a bit early.
In order to accelerate releasing 20.01.02, or next, with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, I suggest to run the demos with them.
What do you guys think?
Jacques
Le 20/12/2022 à 09:33, Michael Brohl a écrit :
> In my opinion, before we do a RELEASE based on a new JDK (doing a step from 8 to 17), we should have some serious testing with different
> environments etc.
>
> It's only a few weeks since the change which is much different from the long stabilization phases we had in the past.
>
> How can we organize this?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
>
> PS: we could do some testing on Mac and Ubuntu but it will take some time
>
> Am 20.12.22 um 07:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK 17 without any problems.
>>
>> For that, we have OFBIZ-12400 "Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk 11 -> 17" with 2 minor subtasks open.
>>
>> I suggest that you also test on your side in order to allow to release the 22.01.01 version with this configuration.
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Le 19/12/2022 à 14:13, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>>> Yeah,
>>>
>>> I'm agree for the 22.01,
>>> I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work on the new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the next :)
>>>
>>> Nicolas
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases for
>>>> 18.12.
>>>>
>>>> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
>>>> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Michael Brohl <mi...@ecomify.de>.
In my opinion, before we do a RELEASE based on a new JDK (doing a step
from 8 to 17), we should have some serious testing with different
environments etc.
It's only a few weeks since the change which is much different from the
long stabilization phases we had in the past.
How can we organize this?
Best regards,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
PS: we could do some testing on Mac and Ubuntu but it will take some time
Am 20.12.22 um 07:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> Hi All,
>
> After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK 17
> without any problems.
>
> For that, we have OFBIZ-12400 "Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk 11
> -> 17" with 2 minor subtasks open.
>
> I suggest that you also test on your side in order to allow to release
> the 22.01.01 version with this configuration.
>
> TIA
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 19/12/2022 à 14:13, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
>> Yeah,
>>
>> I'm agree for the 22.01,
>> I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work on
>> the new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the next :)
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>
>> On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further
>>> releases for
>>> 18.12.
>>>
>>> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
>>> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Hi All,
After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK 17 without any problems.
For that, we have OFBIZ-12400 "Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk 11 -> 17" with 2 minor subtasks open.
I suggest that you also test on your side in order to allow to release the 22.01.01 version with this configuration.
TIA
Jacques
Le 19/12/2022 à 14:13, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
> Yeah,
>
> I'm agree for the 22.01,
> I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work on the new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the next :)
>
> Nicolas
>
>
> On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases for
>> 18.12.
>>
>> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
>> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dan
>>
Re: OFBiz 21.01 releases
Posted by Nicolas Malin <ni...@nereide.fr>.
Yeah,
I'm agree for the 22.01,
I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work on the
new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the next :)
Nicolas
On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases for
> 18.12.
>
> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should they be
> downloadable from the ofbiz website?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>