Re: [DISCUSS] WebDAV

[Justin Edelson <ju...@justinedelson.com>]

I'm a day behind, but I'm +1 on this.

It isn't quite clear to me or, I suspect, anyone else, but I imagine
that this new WebDAV bundle may be where our JSONP implementation
lives. IIUC, although JSONP will look very much like the existing
GET/POST servlets, it won't be 100% the same, so we'll probably want
to keep the implementation separate for the forseeable future.

Justin

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Felix Meschberger <fm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I fixed SLING-1672 implementing the synthetic resource
> provisioning for the listChildren method in the ResourceResolver. This
> works very nicely with both Clemens Wyss's JQeuery based explorer and my
> whiteboard Milton-based WebDAV bundle.
>
> Thus I wonder, whether we should not replace the jcr/webdav bundle with
> the new Milton based WebDAV bundle, which provides full access to the
> resource tree, while the jcr/webdav bundle just provides access to the
> repository.
>
> Along the same lines I consider expanding the Milton-based WebDAV bundle
> to have a version supporting the Jackrabbit DAVex protocol.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> Felix
>