You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by Piotr Kosiorowski <pk...@gmail.com> on 2006/03/09 21:31:09 UTC
Nutch 0.7.2
Hello,
I would like to release nutch 0.7.2 in a week or two. Some serious
bugfixes are already covered and I have a plan to fix one or two more.
I found an email from Doug with title "[Fwd: Crawler submits forms?]"
stating: "This has been fixed in the mapred branch, but that patch is
not in 0.7.1. This alone might be a reason to make a 0.7.2 release. "
I just want to make sure it was fixed by svn commit: r348533
"Fix to not extract urls whose method=post.". I think this was the fix
but I wanted to make sure before committing.
Any objections against the plan?
Piotr
Re: Nutch 0.7.2
Posted by Piotr Kosiorowski <pk...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
I think I have fixed everything I had planned for 0.7.2 release. I will
review JIRA issues one more time to check if I would lie to add more
things. So I plan to release 0.7.2 in few days.
Regards
Piotr
Richard Braman wrote:
> Maybe the http post functionality should be moved to somewhere else, as
> certainly the http post functionality might prove useful for other
> things.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Cutting [mailto:cutting@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:43 PM
> To: nutch-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Nutch 0.7.2
>
>
> Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:
>> I found an email from Doug with title "[Fwd: Crawler submits forms?]"
>> stating: "This has been fixed in the mapred branch, but that patch is
>> not in 0.7.1. This alone might be a reason to make a 0.7.2 release. "
>> I just want to make sure it was fixed by svn commit: r348533
>> "Fix to not extract urls whose method=post.". I think this was the fix
>
>> but I wanted to make sure before committing.
>
> Yes, that looks like the right patch.
>
>> Any objections against the plan?
>
> +1
>
> Doug
>
>
RE: Nutch 0.7.2
Posted by Richard Braman <rb...@bramantax.com>.
Maybe the http post functionality should be moved to somewhere else, as
certainly the http post functionality might prove useful for other
things.
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Cutting [mailto:cutting@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:43 PM
To: nutch-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Nutch 0.7.2
Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:
> I found an email from Doug with title "[Fwd: Crawler submits forms?]"
> stating: "This has been fixed in the mapred branch, but that patch is
> not in 0.7.1. This alone might be a reason to make a 0.7.2 release. "
> I just want to make sure it was fixed by svn commit: r348533
> "Fix to not extract urls whose method=post.". I think this was the fix
> but I wanted to make sure before committing.
Yes, that looks like the right patch.
> Any objections against the plan?
+1
Doug
Re: Nutch 0.7.2
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>.
Piotr Kosiorowski wrote:
> I found an email from Doug with title "[Fwd: Crawler submits forms?]"
> stating: "This has been fixed in the mapred branch, but that patch is
> not in 0.7.1. This alone might be a reason to make a 0.7.2 release. "
> I just want to make sure it was fixed by svn commit: r348533
> "Fix to not extract urls whose method=post.". I think this was the fix
> but I wanted to make sure before committing.
Yes, that looks like the right patch.
> Any objections against the plan?
+1
Doug
Re: Nutch 0.7.2
Posted by og...@yahoo.com.
I'm still on 0.7*, and would welcome a new release.
Otis
----- Original Message ----
From: Piotr Kosiorowski <pk...@gmail.com>
To: nutch-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2006 3:31:09 PM
Subject: Nutch 0.7.2
Hello,
I would like to release nutch 0.7.2 in a week or two. Some serious
bugfixes are already covered and I have a plan to fix one or two more.
I found an email from Doug with title "[Fwd: Crawler submits forms?]"
stating: "This has been fixed in the mapred branch, but that patch is
not in 0.7.1. This alone might be a reason to make a 0.7.2 release. "
I just want to make sure it was fixed by svn commit: r348533
"Fix to not extract urls whose method=post.". I think this was the fix
but I wanted to make sure before committing.
Any objections against the plan?
Piotr