You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by "Alexey Goncharuk (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/11/16 11:38:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-6933) Consider executing updates in-place
when SQL indexes are present or object size is smaller than the old object
size
Alexey Goncharuk created IGNITE-6933:
----------------------------------------
Summary: Consider executing updates in-place when SQL indexes are present or object size is smaller than the old object size
Key: IGNITE-6933
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6933
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public (Viewable by anyone)
Reporter: Alexey Goncharuk
Currently, we are able to execute in-place updates when the new object size exactly matches the old object size and SQL indexes are absent. This leads to a significant performance cost because of extra FreeList updates and extra indexes updates when only one field has changed.
A few possibilities which should be carefully examined:
1) Allow in-place updates if a new object size is smaller than the old object size (allow some space leak into the data page) and defer FreeList update to some later time (introduce a threshold?)
2) Examine (or propagate) the list of changed fields and allow in-place updates if indexed fields did not change
3) Investigate if we can implement an in-place update even with indexed fields - first, remove the value from indexes, then update, then insert value to indexes (note that there is a window when the value is not accessible via indexes in this case, so this is not a safe option). Also, do not update indexes if the indexed value did not change
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)