You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/04/10 03:02:00 UTC

[jira] [Work logged] (HIVE-27238) Avoid Calcite Code generation for RelMetaDataProvider on every query

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-27238?focusedWorklogId=855669&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-855669 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HIVE-27238:
-----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 10/Apr/23 03:01
            Start Date: 10/Apr/23 03:01
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: scarlin-cloudera opened a new pull request, #4212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/4212

   …y query
   
   In the current code base, a new CachingRelMetadataProvider is created on every query.  This causes a cache miss within JaninoRelMetadataProvider, which stores the provider in the key. As a result, a new MetadataHandler is created multiple times in every query, which causes code generation and is a small hit on performance
   
   This commit caches HiveDefaultRelMetadataProviders globally which stores a RelMetadataProvider that can be reused. Ultimately, this class could most likely be removed as well, but this commit limits the scope of the change in a first pass.
   
   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/HowToContribute
     2. Ensure that you have created an issue on the Hive project JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HIVE/summary
     3. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
     4. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP]HIVE-XXXXX:  Your PR title ...'.
     5. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     6. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     7. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review.
   
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   Stated in commit message
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   This will help performance and possibly have a smaller memory footprint.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description, screenshot and/or a reproducable example to show the behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to the released Hive versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
    No
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add.
   -->
   This doesn't introduce new functionality, so current regression tests should be good. I ran this through the debugger and made sure the Calcite JaninoMetadataProvider.load3 method was not called after the first query was called with the same conf variables.
   




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

            Worklog Id:     (was: 855669)
    Remaining Estimate: 0h
            Time Spent: 10m

> Avoid Calcite Code generation for RelMetaDataProvider on every query
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-27238
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-27238
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HiveServer2
>            Reporter: Steve Carlin
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In CalcitePlanner, we are instantiating a new CachingRelMetadataProvider on every query.  Within the Calcite code, they keep the provider key to prevent a new MetadataHandler class from being created.  But by generating a new provider, the cache never gets a hit so we keep instantiating new MetadataHandlers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)