You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID> on 2016/09/02 08:33:39 UTC
moving from 120 chars limit to 150 or even 180?
Monitors are big enough these days.
120 chars is really a bit limiting sometimes.
wdyt?
LieGrue,
strub
Re: moving from 120 chars limit to 150 or even 180?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
The reason why I came up with this is that many code lines are wildly broken at seemingly random locations.
That makes the code harder to read.
I'll show you what I mean with
good:
if (some.getX().statementA() && some.getY().statementB()) {..
good:
if (some.getX().statementA()
&& some.getY().statementB()) {..
bad:
if (some.getX("bla" +
"blub").statementA(
13) && some.getY
("oh").statementB(
"gosh")) {..
Of course in practice our commands are longer, but similar 'unattractive' to read ;)
Most times forced by the line length limit.
LieGrue,
strub
> On Friday, 2 September 2016, 16:05, Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have mixed feeling for this.
>
> I like having a complete statement in one line for visual and logical
> grouping.
> But having multiple statements or constructs in a single long line hinders
> debugging and problem isolation.
>
> +/-0
>
> Albert.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Monitors are big enough these days.
>>
>> 120 chars is really a bit limiting sometimes.
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Albert Lee.
>
Re: moving from 120 chars limit to 150 or even 180?
Posted by Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com>.
I have mixed feeling for this.
I like having a complete statement in one line for visual and logical
grouping.
But having multiple statements or constructs in a single long line hinders
debugging and problem isolation.
+/-0
Albert.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>
wrote:
> Monitors are big enough these days.
>
> 120 chars is really a bit limiting sometimes.
>
> wdyt?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
--
Albert Lee.
Re: moving from 120 chars limit to 150 or even 180?
Posted by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>.
On 2016-09-02 10:33 (+0200), Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID> wrote:
> Monitors are big enough these days.
>
> 120 chars is really a bit limiting sometimes.
>
> wdyt?
I am +-0 for that, 120 chars do not look that bad to me.
Regards.
Re: moving from 120 chars limit to 150 or even 180?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1 whatever one you pick
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
2016-09-02 10:33 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> Monitors are big enough these days.
>
> 120 chars is really a bit limiting sometimes.
>
> wdyt?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>