You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> on 2022/05/14 21:00:40 UTC
[VOTE] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1
Hey All,
We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose without a heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're not yet actively running the signature tests on the TomEE side.
I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work with and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts
Staging Maven repository:
- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via contributor Richard Zowalla.
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
[ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
-David
Re: GERONIMO-6832 - SigTests + TCK Failures for Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hi Richard,
I reviewed and merged you diff.
Thanks
Le lun. 23 mai 2022 à 21:56, Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowalla@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I gave it a try: the main issues were related to the change regarding
> java.desktop.
>
> I added a patch (svn diff) to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6832 with some changes.
> With this changes, the TCK + Sigtests are now passing for Java 8 + Java
> 11:
>
> [javatest.batch] Number of tests completed: 90 (90 pass, 0 fail, 0
> errors)
> [javatest.batch]
> ***************************************************************
> [javatest.batch] Completed running 90 tests.
> [javatest.batch] Number of Tests Passed = 90
> [javatest.batch] Number of Tests Failed = 0
> [javatest.batch] Number of Tests with Errors = 0
> [javatest.batch] Number of Tests Not Run = 0
>
> If someone can have a look, it would be appreciated.
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
>
> Am Montag, dem 23.05.2022 um 18:47 +0000 schrieb Zowalla, Richard:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I did run the sig tests + tck on the 2.0.0-M1 and found some issues.
> > Subsequently, I created
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6832 and will try to
> > fix
> > them.
> >
> > Gruß
> > Richard
> >
>
>
--
Jean-Louis
GERONIMO-6832 - SigTests + TCK Failures for Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by "Zowalla, Richard" <ri...@hs-heilbronn.de>.
Hi all,
I gave it a try: the main issues were related to the change regarding
java.desktop.
I added a patch (svn diff) to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6832 with some changes.
With this changes, the TCK + Sigtests are now passing for Java 8 + Java
11:
[javatest.batch] Number of tests completed: 90 (90 pass, 0 fail, 0
errors)
[javatest.batch]
***************************************************************
[javatest.batch] Completed running 90 tests.
[javatest.batch] Number of Tests Passed = 90
[javatest.batch] Number of Tests Failed = 0
[javatest.batch] Number of Tests with Errors = 0
[javatest.batch] Number of Tests Not Run = 0
If someone can have a look, it would be appreciated.
Gruß
Richard
Am Montag, dem 23.05.2022 um 18:47 +0000 schrieb Zowalla, Richard:
> Hi all,
>
> I did run the sig tests + tck on the 2.0.0-M1 and found some issues.
> Subsequently, I created
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6832 and will try to
> fix
> them.
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
Re: [RESULT] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by "Zowalla, Richard" <ri...@hs-heilbronn.de>.
Hi all,
I did run the sig tests + tck on the 2.0.0-M1 and found some issues.
Subsequently, I created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6832 and will try to fix
them.
Gruß
Richard
Am Montag, dem 23.05.2022 um 08:55 -0700 schrieb David Blevins:
> Vote passes with 6 +1s (4 binding)
>
> As noted I didn't go for a final as we still haven't run the full set
> of TCK tests which include the signature tests. If someone would
> like to do that or propose a final without doing that, they're
> welcome to do so.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> > On May 14, 2022, at 2:00 PM, David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of
> > the snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with
> > the idea that being a milestone it should be fairly non-
> > controversial to propose without a heads up and I haven't checked
> > the TCK status. I know we're not yet actively running the
> > signature tests on the TomEE side.
> >
> > I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work
> > with and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts
> >
> > Staging Maven repository:
> >
> > -
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
> >
> > The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace
> > via contributor Richard Zowalla.
> >
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > -David
> >
[RESULT] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Vote passes with 6 +1s (4 binding)
As noted I didn't go for a final as we still haven't run the full set of TCK tests which include the signature tests. If someone would like to do that or propose a final without doing that, they're welcome to do so.
-David
> On May 14, 2022, at 2:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose without a heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're not yet actively running the signature tests on the TomEE side.
>
> I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work with and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts
>
> Staging Maven repository:
>
> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
>
> The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via contributor Richard Zowalla.
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> -David
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
My +1
-David
> On May 14, 2022, at 2:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose without a heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're not yet actively running the signature tests on the TomEE side.
>
> I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work with and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts
>
> Staging Maven repository:
>
> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
>
> The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via contributor Richard Zowalla.
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> -David
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Cesar Hernandez <ce...@gmail.com>.
+1
El dom, 15 may 2022 a las 6:24, Raymond Augé (<ra...@liferay.com>)
escribió:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sun., May 15, 2022, 5:58 a.m. Jean-Louis MONTEIRO, <je...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Same feedback, I'd go for a final. There is no work remaining as far as I
>> can tell
>>
>> Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 09:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> If we are confident to match javax/jakarta namespace change why not
>>> doing a final? Errors/missing features could go in bugs.
>>> Issue with milestones is the tooling support and proposed updates vs
>>> version policies so if we can avoid it I would be for it but not sure if I
>>> missed sthg.
>>>
>>> Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 07:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 11:00 PM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hey All,
>>>> >
>>>> > We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of
>>>> the snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea
>>>> that being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose
>>>> without a heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're not
>>>> yet actively running the signature tests on the TomEE side.
>>>> >
>>>> > I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work
>>>> with and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts
>>>> >
>>>> > Staging Maven repository:
>>>> >
>>>> > -
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
>>>> >
>>>> > The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via
>>>> contributor Richard Zowalla.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>>>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> > [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
>>>> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>> >
>>>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>> >
>>>> > -David
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>
--
Atentamente:
César Hernández.
Re: [VOTE] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Raymond Augé <ra...@liferay.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Sun., May 15, 2022, 5:58 a.m. Jean-Louis MONTEIRO, <je...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Same feedback, I'd go for a final. There is no work remaining as far as I
> can tell
>
> Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 09:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> If we are confident to match javax/jakarta namespace change why not doing
>> a final? Errors/missing features could go in bugs.
>> Issue with milestones is the tooling support and proposed updates vs
>> version policies so if we can avoid it I would be for it but not sure if I
>> missed sthg.
>>
>> Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 07:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 11:00 PM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hey All,
>>> >
>>> > We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of
>>> the snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea
>>> that being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose
>>> without a heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're not
>>> yet actively running the signature tests on the TomEE side.
>>> >
>>> > I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work
>>> with and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts
>>> >
>>> > Staging Maven repository:
>>> >
>>> > -
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
>>> >
>>> > The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via
>>> contributor Richard Zowalla.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> > [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
>>> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> >
>>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> >
>>> > -David
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
+1
Same feedback, I'd go for a final. There is no work remaining as far as I
can tell
Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 09:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Hi
>
> If we are confident to match javax/jakarta namespace change why not doing
> a final? Errors/missing features could go in bugs.
> Issue with milestones is the tooling support and proposed updates vs
> version policies so if we can avoid it I would be for it but not sure if I
> missed sthg.
>
> Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 07:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> a
> écrit :
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 11:00 PM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey All,
>> >
>> > We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the
>> snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that
>> being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose without
>> a heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're not yet
>> actively running the signature tests on the TomEE side.
>> >
>> > I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work
>> with and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts
>> >
>> > Staging Maven repository:
>> >
>> > -
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
>> >
>> > The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via
>> contributor Richard Zowalla.
>> >
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
>> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> >
>> > -David
>> >
>>
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi
If we are confident to match javax/jakarta namespace change why not doing a
final? Errors/missing features could go in bugs.
Issue with milestones is the tooling support and proposed updates vs
version policies so if we can avoid it I would be for it but not sure if I
missed sthg.
Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 07:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> a
écrit :
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 11:00 PM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the
> snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that
> being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose without
> a heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're not yet
> actively running the signature tests on the TomEE side.
> >
> > I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work with
> and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts
> >
> > Staging Maven repository:
> >
> > -
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
> >
> > The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via
> contributor Richard Zowalla.
> >
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > -David
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 11:00 PM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose without a heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're not yet actively running the signature tests on the TomEE side.
>
> I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work with and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts
>
> Staging Maven repository:
>
> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
>
> The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via contributor Richard Zowalla.
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> -David
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by Daniel Dias Dos Santos <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi +1
Thanks :)
On Sat, May 14, 2022, 18:00 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the
> snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that
> being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose without
> a heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're not yet
> actively running the signature tests on the TomEE side.
>
> I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work with
> and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts
>
> Staging Maven repository:
>
> -
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
>
> The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via
> contributor Richard Zowalla.
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> -David
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1
Posted by fpapon <fp...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Same feedback as Romain, I don't think we need a M1.
regards,
François
On 14/05/2022 23:00, David Blevins wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose without a heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're not yet actively running the signature tests on the TomEE side.
>
> I propose we release 2.0.0-M1 so we have some non-snapshots to work with and come back to 2.0.0 as things look 100% on all fronts
>
> Staging Maven repository:
>
> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1153/
>
> The only change is conversion from javax to the jakarta namespace via contributor Richard Zowalla.
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Abstain (please provide specific comments)
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> -David
>
--
--
François