You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to scm@geronimo.apache.org by gd...@apache.org on 2008/04/15 10:16:50 UTC

svn commit: r648166 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml

Author: gdamour
Date: Tue Apr 15 01:16:50 2008
New Revision: 648166

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648166&view=rev
Log:
as pointed out by Donald, all WADI versions should have been upgraded to 2.0-M10

Modified:
    geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml

Modified: geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml?rev=648166&r1=648165&r2=648166&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml (original)
+++ geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml Tue Apr 15 01:16:50 2008
@@ -1060,19 +1060,19 @@
             <dependency>
                 <groupId>org.codehaus.wadi</groupId>
                 <artifactId>wadi-core</artifactId>
-                <version>2.0-M9</version>
+                <version>2.0-M10</version>
             </dependency>
 
             <dependency>
                 <groupId>org.codehaus.wadi</groupId>
                 <artifactId>wadi-group</artifactId>
-                <version>2.0-M9</version>
+                <version>2.0-M10</version>
             </dependency>
 
             <dependency>
                 <groupId>org.codehaus.wadi</groupId>
                 <artifactId>wadi-tribes</artifactId>
-                <version>2.0-M9</version>
+                <version>2.0-M10</version>
             </dependency>
 
             <dependency>



Re: svn commit: r648166 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml

Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
I am of the same opinion.  It will also help in avoiding similar errors in
future.

++Vamsi

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>
wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:16 AM,  <gd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Author: gdamour
> >  Date: Tue Apr 15 01:16:50 2008
> >  New Revision: 648166
> >
> >  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648166&view=rev
> >  Log:
> >  as pointed out by Donald, all WADI versions should have been upgraded
> to 2.0-M10
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to introduce a variable so the change would've
> boiled down to updating it only? Just like derbyVersion oraz
> openejbVersion.
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>

Re: svn commit: r648166 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml

Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:16 AM,  <gd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: gdamour
>  Date: Tue Apr 15 01:16:50 2008
>  New Revision: 648166
>
>  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648166&view=rev
>  Log:
>  as pointed out by Donald, all WADI versions should have been upgraded to 2.0-M10

Wouldn't it be easier to introduce a variable so the change would've
boiled down to updating it only? Just like derbyVersion oraz
openejbVersion.

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl