You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Bram Mertens <br...@linux.be> on 2004/02/24 09:14:44 UTC
Re: What is wrong with this configuration? - FIXED
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 10:37, Bram Mertens wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 00:42, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Bram Mertens wrote:
> > > debug: bayes: 29656 tie-ing to DB file R/O /home/m8ram/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
> > > debug: bayes: 29656 tie-ing to DB file R/O /home/m8ram/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
> > > debug: bayes: found bayes db version 0
> >
> > See, that's the thing... Your SA install hasn't updated the DB to v2 yet.
Thanks Theo! That did it!
m8ram@linux:~> sa-learn -p /home/m8ram/.spamassassin/user_prefs --dump magic
0.000 0 2 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 8736 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 62058 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 136848 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0 1058120598 0 non-token data: oldest atime
0.000 0 1077607934 0 non-token data: newest atime
0.000 0 1077608525 0 non-token data: last journal sync atime
0.000 0 1077574102 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 0 2764800 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta
0.000 0 1272932 0 non-token data: last expire reduction count
And more than 50% of all messages SA previously misclassified as ham are
now classified as spam!
Should I add this [problem with the db-version] to the wiki?
Regards
Bram
--
# Mertens Bram "M8ram" <br...@linux.be> Linux User #249103 #
# SuSE Linux 8.2 (i586) kernel 2.4.20-4GB i686 256MB RAM #
# 9:11am up 32 days 12:50, 7 users, load average: 0.12, 0.05, 0.06 #