You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@tuscany.apache.org by Apache Hudson Server <hu...@hudson.apache.org> on 2010/12/08 01:54:20 UTC
Hudson build became unstable: Tuscany-2x » Apache Tuscany SCA Specification Compliance Tests Assembly #9
See <https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/org.apache.tuscany.sca$tuscany-compliance-test-assembly/9/>
Re: Hudson build became unstable: Tuscany-2x » Apache Tuscany SCA Specification Compliance Tests Assembly #9
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
Mmm, i've not debugged it at all but the fails I see are due to loop in
xmlschema code so r1043206 seems suspicious.
...ant
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:06 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The versions of the xsd's that are planned to be final ones have just
> been
> > published by OASIS so we should move up to them which would also help
> test
> > them for OASIS, see:
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00000.html
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Raymond Feng <cy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm trying to fix it ...
> >> ________________________________________________________________
> >> Raymond Feng
> >> rfeng@apache.org
> >> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
> >> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
> >> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
> >> ________________________________________________________________
> >> On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> >>
> >> After debugging into the problem, I found out the OASIS OpenCSA XSDs for
> >> SCA specs (pulled into Tuscany under assmbly-xsd project) are
> inconsistent.
> >> For example,
> >> sca-core-1.1-cd05-rev1.xsd includes sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd
> >> sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd includes sca-core-1.1-cd06.xsd (doesn't
> >> exist)
> >> Any chance to fix the XSDs?
> >> [1]
> http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/sca-assembly/SCA_XSDS/
> >> On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
> >>
> >> See
> >> <
> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/org.apache.tuscany.sca$tuscany-compliance-test-assembly/9/
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> And why did it just start failing last night? Did we change something?
>
> Simon
>
> --
> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
>
Re: Hudson build became unstable: Tuscany-2x » Apache Tuscany SCA Specification Compliance Tests Assembly #9
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:06 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The versions of the xsd's that are planned to be final ones have just been
> published by OASIS so we should move up to them which would also help test
> them for OASIS, see:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00000.html
>
> ...ant
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Raymond Feng <cy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to fix it ...
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> Raymond Feng
>> rfeng@apache.org
>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>>
>> After debugging into the problem, I found out the OASIS OpenCSA XSDs for
>> SCA specs (pulled into Tuscany under assmbly-xsd project) are inconsistent.
>> For example,
>> sca-core-1.1-cd05-rev1.xsd includes sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd
>> sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd includes sca-core-1.1-cd06.xsd (doesn't
>> exist)
>> Any chance to fix the XSDs?
>> [1] http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/sca-assembly/SCA_XSDS/
>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
>>
>> See
>> <https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/org.apache.tuscany.sca$tuscany-compliance-test-assembly/9/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
And why did it just start failing last night? Did we change something?
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
Re: Hudson build became unstable: Tuscany-2x » Apache Tuscany SCA Specification Compliance Tests Assembly #9
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
The versions of the xsd's that are planned to be final ones have just been
published by OASIS so we should move up to them which would also help test
them for OASIS, see:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00000.html
...ant
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Raymond Feng <cy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to fix it ...
> *________________________________________________________________
> Raymond Feng
> rfeng@apache.org
> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
> ________________________________________________________________*
>
> On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>
> After debugging into the problem, I found out the OASIS OpenCSA XSDs for
> SCA specs (pulled into Tuscany under assmbly-xsd project) are inconsistent.
> For example,
>
> sca-core-1.1-cd05-rev1.xsd includes sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd
> sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd includes sca-core-1.1-cd06.xsd (doesn't exist)
>
> Any chance to fix the XSDs?
>
> [1] http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/sca-assembly/SCA_XSDS/
>
> On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
>
> See <
> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/org.apache.tuscany.sca$tuscany-compliance-test-assembly/9/
> >
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Hudson build became unstable: Tuscany-2x » Apache Tuscany SCA Specification Compliance Tests Assembly #9
Posted by Raymond Feng <cy...@gmail.com>.
I'm trying to fix it ...
________________________________________________________________
Raymond Feng
rfeng@apache.org
Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
________________________________________________________________
On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> After debugging into the problem, I found out the OASIS OpenCSA XSDs for SCA specs (pulled into Tuscany under assmbly-xsd project) are inconsistent. For example,
>
> sca-core-1.1-cd05-rev1.xsd includes sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd
> sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd includes sca-core-1.1-cd06.xsd (doesn't exist)
>
> Any chance to fix the XSDs?
>
> [1] http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/sca-assembly/SCA_XSDS/
>
> On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
>
>> See <https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/org.apache.tuscany.sca$tuscany-compliance-test-assembly/9/>
>>
>>
>
Re: Hudson build became unstable: Tuscany-2x » Apache Tuscany SCA Specification Compliance Tests Assembly #9
Posted by Raymond Feng <cy...@gmail.com>.
After debugging into the problem, I found out the OASIS OpenCSA XSDs for SCA specs (pulled into Tuscany under assmbly-xsd project) are inconsistent. For example,
sca-core-1.1-cd05-rev1.xsd includes sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd
sca-policy-1.1-cd03-rev1.xsd includes sca-core-1.1-cd06.xsd (doesn't exist)
Any chance to fix the XSDs?
[1] http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/sca-assembly/SCA_XSDS/
On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
> See <https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/org.apache.tuscany.sca$tuscany-compliance-test-assembly/9/>
>
>