You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hive.apache.org by Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org> on 2012/04/13 20:50:12 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0
Hey all,
Apache Hive 0.9.0-rc0 is out and available at
http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hive-0.9.0-rc0/
Release notes are available at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310843&version=12317742
Please give it a try, let us know.
Hive PMC members: Please test and vote.
Thanks,
Ashutosh
Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>.
This vote stands cancelled because of various problems people have found in
RC0. Thanks to all who tried RC0. I will respin RC1 shortly.
Thanks,
Ashutosh
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:50, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Apache Hive 0.9.0-rc0 is out and available at
> http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hive-0.9.0-rc0/
>
> Release notes are available at:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310843&version=12317742
>
> Please give it a try, let us know.
>
> Hive PMC members: Please test and vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Kevin Wilfong <ke...@fb.com>.
The only drawbacks I can think of are
1) As I mentioned, view partitions will not have an associated region, but
I don't think this matters to anyone else.
2) There will be an inconsistency in DESCRIBE FORMATTED, in that for view
partitions it will not list storage data. This seems inherent in the fact
that view partitions are purely metadata, and it is an improvement on the
null pointer exception that occurred in previous releases.
I created a JIRA to do this and uploaded a patch here
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2961
Kevin
On 4/18/12 2:08 PM, "Carl Steinbach" <ca...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>Hi Kevin
>
>
>> I can add a patch removing the need for this script and the script
>>itself
>> to be included in the release.
>>
>
>This sounds like the best option to me. Are there any drawbacks to this
>approach?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Carl
Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Carl Steinbach <ca...@cloudera.com>.
Hi Kevin
> I can add a patch removing the need for this script and the script itself
> to be included in the release.
>
This sounds like the best option to me. Are there any drawbacks to this
approach?
Thanks.
Carl
Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Kevin Wilfong <ke...@fb.com>.
Regarding HIVE-2795, that Python script was intended to solve two problems.
1) The null pointer exception that resulted from calling describe
formatted on a view partition
2) View partitions did not have storage descriptors, so they did not have
a concept of region like other objects.
2 no longer seems to be an issue. 1 could also be solved by not
displaying storage information for view partitions when describe formatted
is called on them, which seems reasonable since they are purely metadata.
I can add a patch removing the need for this script and the script itself
to be included in the release.
Kevin Wilfong
On 4/16/12 10:53 AM, "Carl Steinbach" <ca...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>-1
>
>* RELEASE_NOTES.txt needs to be updated.
>
>* The Postgres metastore upgrade scripts should be excluded from the
>tarball since they are not current. There is already a build property that
>handles this ("include.postgres"), which should default to false.
>
>* HIVE-2795 added a python metastore upgrade script located in
>scripts/metastore/upgrade. This script is not mentioned in any of the
>README.txt files, and it's also not clear which version of Python is
>required to run it. Furthermore, the docs in the python script are not
>very
>clear, probably won't work with Derby, and reference a dependency in
>"trunk/build/dist/lib/py" which is not present in the tarball.
>
>* The lib/ directory contains some new JARs which are not covered in the
>LICENSE file (it's also possible that these are not really required), as
>well as a couple cases of multiple versions of the same JAR. Here are the
>ones that jump out at me, though there are probably some I missed:
>** JavaEWAH-0.3.2
>** antlr-2.7.7 and antlr-3.0.1?
>** commons-codec-1.3 and commons-codec-1.4?
>** commons-logging-1.0.4 and commons-logging-1.1.1?
>** hamcrest-core-1.1
>** hsqldb-1.8.0.10
>** kfs-0.3
>** oro-2.0.8 (This uses v1.1 of the ASF license)
>
>Thanks.
>
>Carl
>
>On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan
><ha...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Couple more points:
>>
>> Maven artifacts are available at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-043/
>>for
>> folks to try out.
>>
>> Vote runs for 3 business days so will expire on Wednesday, 4/18.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ashutosh
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:50, Ashutosh Chauhan <hashutosh@apache.org
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Hey all,
>> >
>> > Apache Hive 0.9.0-rc0 is out and available at
>> > http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hive-0.9.0-rc0/
>> >
>> > Release notes are available at:
>> >
>>
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310843
>>&version=12317742
>> >
>> > Please give it a try, let us know.
>> >
>> > Hive PMC members: Please test and vote.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Ashutosh
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Carl Steinbach <ca...@cloudera.com>.
-1
* RELEASE_NOTES.txt needs to be updated.
* The Postgres metastore upgrade scripts should be excluded from the
tarball since they are not current. There is already a build property that
handles this ("include.postgres"), which should default to false.
* HIVE-2795 added a python metastore upgrade script located in
scripts/metastore/upgrade. This script is not mentioned in any of the
README.txt files, and it's also not clear which version of Python is
required to run it. Furthermore, the docs in the python script are not very
clear, probably won't work with Derby, and reference a dependency in
"trunk/build/dist/lib/py" which is not present in the tarball.
* The lib/ directory contains some new JARs which are not covered in the
LICENSE file (it's also possible that these are not really required), as
well as a couple cases of multiple versions of the same JAR. Here are the
ones that jump out at me, though there are probably some I missed:
** JavaEWAH-0.3.2
** antlr-2.7.7 and antlr-3.0.1?
** commons-codec-1.3 and commons-codec-1.4?
** commons-logging-1.0.4 and commons-logging-1.1.1?
** hamcrest-core-1.1
** hsqldb-1.8.0.10
** kfs-0.3
** oro-2.0.8 (This uses v1.1 of the ASF license)
Thanks.
Carl
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>wrote:
> Couple more points:
>
> Maven artifacts are available at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-043/ for
> folks to try out.
>
> Vote runs for 3 business days so will expire on Wednesday, 4/18.
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:50, Ashutosh Chauhan <hashutosh@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Apache Hive 0.9.0-rc0 is out and available at
> > http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hive-0.9.0-rc0/
> >
> > Release notes are available at:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310843&version=12317742
> >
> > Please give it a try, let us know.
> >
> > Hive PMC members: Please test and vote.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ashutosh
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>.
Couple more points:
Maven artifacts are available at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-043/ for
folks to try out.
Vote runs for 3 business days so will expire on Wednesday, 4/18.
Thanks,
Ashutosh
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:50, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Apache Hive 0.9.0-rc0 is out and available at
> http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hive-0.9.0-rc0/
>
> Release notes are available at:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310843&version=12317742
>
> Please give it a try, let us know.
>
> Hive PMC members: Please test and vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>.
Hey Lars,
Thanks for taking a look. HIVE-1634 introduced new storage type for hbase
tables, namely binary. Since, bug manifests itself only for binary storage
type. This doesnt count as a regression since functionality for binary
storage itself was added through HIVE-1634. Since, this is not a regression
of existing functionality, it won't count as a blocker for 0.9 release.
Nonetheless, other folks have found other problems in RC0, so I have to
respin. Thus, I will consider HIVE-2958 fix for RC1.
Thanks,
Ashutosh
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 23:46, Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> thanks for putting up the RC. We tried it yesterday and we stumbled
> across HIVE-2958 which seems like a bug that should be fixed before
> release because it was introduced with HIVE-1634 which is new to 0.9
> too and breaks GROUP BY queries on HBase which were working before.
>
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
I'm -1 (nonbinding) on rc0 so that we can incorporate HIVE-2930, which
fixes the Apache headers on the source files. (Thanks for committing
that!)
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 0.9.0 Release Candidate 0
Posted by Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com>.
Hey,
thanks for putting up the RC. We tried it yesterday and we stumbled
across HIVE-2958 which seems like a bug that should be fixed before
release because it was introduced with HIVE-1634 which is new to 0.9
too and breaks GROUP BY queries on HBase which were working before.
-1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Lars