You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by pl...@lanminds.com on 2003/09/05 17:01:58 UTC

Subversion 0.29.0 released

I am pleased to announce that another interim release of Subversion is
now available. You can grab release 0.29.0 at the following
location:

	http://subversion.tigris.org/files/documents/15/5977/subversion-0.29.0.tar.gz
	

The MD5 checksum for this release is 5de4d92eae7ea5d83fe6c3964a08e261

Please note this release was tested against and ships with the latest
neon release, 0.24.1, available at:

	http://www.webdav.org/neon/neon-0.24.1.tar.gz

For a full list of changes please refer to the end of this email.

Please direct all questions and comments regarding this release to
the dev_at_subversion.tigris.org mailing list.

===============

Version 0.29.0 (released 05 Sep 2003, revision 6976)
http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/0.29.0

 User-visible changes:
 * 'svn status' now streams its response.  (r6913, #1426)
 * 'svn status' now recurses into externals (r6913, #1428)
 * new 'svnadmin verify' command to verify repository data (r6851, #1074)
 * SSL changes:  (r6958, #1371)
     - dropped support for PEM-encoded client certs, only accept PKCS12 now.
     - 'ssl-authority-files' is now a list of CA files
     - no more 'ssl-client-cert-type' and 'ssl-client-key-file' variables.
 * new svndumpfilter option: '--preserve-revprops' to keep props on empty revs
 * mailer.py improvement:  handle multiple match groups (r6940)
 * remove in-repos/on-disk repository template features, till post-1.0 (r6965)
 * various cleanups to the Book
 * other bugfixes: switch deletion bug (r6890, #1496), status
   repos-delete bug (r6913, #1469), reversion of '.' (r6953, #854).

 Developer-visible changes:
 * GUI developers take note: prompting API changed (r6928, #1214)
 * now compile against neon-0.24; 0.23.9 support to be dropped soon. (r6958)
 * various improvements to Perl/SWIG bindings
 * tree re-org:  non-core utilities split into 'tools' and 'contrib' areas.
 * some gen_make.py/gen-base.py improvements
 * configure.in CFLAGS bugfix (r6963)
 * stop callng deprecated APIs in APR, in preparation for upcoming APR-1.0.

-- 

Seeya,
Paul



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Subversion 0.29.0 released

Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
Oh, Ok.  I mis-read what you were saying.  You said the neon 0.23.9 was 
used.  My mind parsed that somehow as "subversion 0.29.0".  :-)

   - David

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Steve Williams wrote:

> That's basically what I wanted to know.  I was just curious because the
> 0.29.0 release notes made mention of being tested with neon 0.24.1 and that
> support for neon 0.23.9 will be dropped soon.
> 
> Sly
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Summers" <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>
> To: "Steve Williams" <st...@kromestudios.com>
> Cc: "SVN Dev" <de...@subversion.tigris.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Subversion 0.29.0 released
> 
> 
> >
> > I'm not sure what you are talking about.  I built Subversion 0.29.0 with
> > neon 0.23.9 and made it availabe late Friday night.
> >
> >    - David Summers
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Steve Williams wrote:
> >
> > > > Please note this release was tested against and ships with the latest
> > > > neon release, 0.24.1, available at:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.webdav.org/neon/neon-0.24.1.tar.gz
> > > [snip]
> > > >  * now compile against neon-0.24; 0.23.9 support to be dropped soon.
> > > > (r6958)
> > >
> > > Concerning the 0.29.0 RPMs for RedHat 9.0 available at
> summersoft.fay.ar.us,
> > > have these been built with neon 0.24.1?  Or were they built with neon
> > > 0.23.9?  The reason I ask is that the neon RPMs available on the
> summersoft
> > > site are still 0.23.9.
> > >
> >

-- 
David Wayne Summers          "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us   PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint =  C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B  60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Subversion 0.29.0 released

Posted by Steve Williams <st...@kromestudios.com>.
That's basically what I wanted to know.  I was just curious because the
0.29.0 release notes made mention of being tested with neon 0.24.1 and that
support for neon 0.23.9 will be dropped soon.

Sly

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Summers" <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>
To: "Steve Williams" <st...@kromestudios.com>
Cc: "SVN Dev" <de...@subversion.tigris.org>
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: Subversion 0.29.0 released


>
> I'm not sure what you are talking about.  I built Subversion 0.29.0 with
> neon 0.23.9 and made it availabe late Friday night.
>
>    - David Summers
>
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Steve Williams wrote:
>
> > > Please note this release was tested against and ships with the latest
> > > neon release, 0.24.1, available at:
> > >
> > > http://www.webdav.org/neon/neon-0.24.1.tar.gz
> > [snip]
> > >  * now compile against neon-0.24; 0.23.9 support to be dropped soon.
> > > (r6958)
> >
> > Concerning the 0.29.0 RPMs for RedHat 9.0 available at
summersoft.fay.ar.us,
> > have these been built with neon 0.24.1?  Or were they built with neon
> > 0.23.9?  The reason I ask is that the neon RPMs available on the
summersoft
> > site are still 0.23.9.
> >
>
> -- 
> David Wayne Summers          "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware
upgrades!"
> david@summersoft.fay.ar.us   PGP Key:
http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
> PGP Key fingerprint =  C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B  60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Subversion 0.29.0 released

Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
I'm not sure what you are talking about.  I built Subversion 0.29.0 with 
neon 0.23.9 and made it availabe late Friday night.

   - David Summers

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Steve Williams wrote:

> > Please note this release was tested against and ships with the latest
> > neon release, 0.24.1, available at:
> >
> > http://www.webdav.org/neon/neon-0.24.1.tar.gz
> [snip]
> >  * now compile against neon-0.24; 0.23.9 support to be dropped soon.
> > (r6958)
> 
> Concerning the 0.29.0 RPMs for RedHat 9.0 available at summersoft.fay.ar.us,
> have these been built with neon 0.24.1?  Or were they built with neon
> 0.23.9?  The reason I ask is that the neon RPMs available on the summersoft
> site are still 0.23.9.
> 

-- 
David Wayne Summers          "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us   PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint =  C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B  60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Subversion 0.29.0 released

Posted by Steve Williams <st...@kromestudios.com>.
> Please note this release was tested against and ships with the latest
> neon release, 0.24.1, available at:
>
> http://www.webdav.org/neon/neon-0.24.1.tar.gz
[snip]
>  * now compile against neon-0.24; 0.23.9 support to be dropped soon.
> (r6958)

Concerning the 0.29.0 RPMs for RedHat 9.0 available at summersoft.fay.ar.us,
have these been built with neon 0.24.1?  Or were they built with neon
0.23.9?  The reason I ask is that the neon RPMs available on the summersoft
site are still 0.23.9.

Sly


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Subversion 0.29.0 released

Posted by Christian Schaffner <ch...@users.sourceforge.net>.
On Freitag, September 5, 2003, at 07:01  Uhr, pll@lanminds.com wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that another interim release of Subversion is
> now available. You can grab release 0.29.0 at the following
> location:

The fink package has now also been updated:
<http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/svn-ssl>

You might need to wait up to 24h before the cvs servers have 
synchronized.

To get it type 'fink selfupdate-cvs' and 'fink install svn-ssl' or 
'fink install svn-client-ssl' in the Terminal.

Note that the svn Fink package is still in the unstable tree.  To 
enable it, please read the Fink FAQ:
<http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#unstable>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org