You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2007/07/07 03:11:34 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41656] - [PATCH] Proposal: some refactoring in the fo tree

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41656>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41656


a_l.delmelle@pandora.be changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From a_l.delmelle@pandora.be  2007-07-06 18:11 -------

Looking again at this patch, and Richard's observations, I'd say it is worth it. Breaks nothing, and the 
benefit seems to become bigger with the number of FOs.

Patch applied. see: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=554104

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41656] - [PATCH] Proposal: some refactoring in the fo tree

Posted by Andreas L Delmelle <a_...@pandora.be>.

On Jul 7, 2007, at 03:11, bugzilla@apache.org wrote:

>
> ------- Additional Comments From a_l.delmelle@pandora.be   
> 2007-07-06 18:11 -------
>
> Looking again at this patch, and Richard's observations, I'd say it  
> is worth it. Breaks nothing, and the
> benefit seems to become bigger with the number of FOs.
>
> Patch applied. see: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=554104

Sorry, people. Just noticed I forgot some javadocs... I'll add these  
ASAP.


Cheers

Andreas