You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jacek Laskowski <jl...@apache.org> on 2005/07/13 20:28:27 UTC
Re: svn commit: r216147 - in /geronimo/site: docs/index.html xdocs/index.xml
geirm@apache.org wrote:
> Author: geirm
> Date: Wed Jul 13 05:21:42 2005
> New Revision: 216147
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=216147&view=rev
> Log:
> added news item about JBI/ESB in Geronimo
>
> Modified:
> geronimo/site/docs/index.html
> geronimo/site/xdocs/index.xml
Why do we need to maintain two different file formats with almost
identical content?
Jacek
Re: svn commit: r216147 - in /geronimo/site: docs/index.html xdocs/index.xml
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>.
On Jul 14, 2005, at 9:06 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>
>> One is the source (.xml) one is the rendered .html.
>> Have you looked at the two files? There is navigation added
>> around the content (index.xml) to produce the page itself
>> (index.html)
>>
>
> Well, I was really asking why we have to maintain two files instead
> of one since the html one is just a product of XSLT processing of
> the source file - index.xml.
>
It's not quite XSL, but similar. And the maintenance is easy.
> I remember a talk about a already-prepared site content so that in
> case of troubles infra people would check them out and easily
> populate damaged site content. Is that just for that?
Yes. Because this way, you are 100% certain that the stuff you
create on your machine and hopefully look at and play w/ before
publishing can be published directly from SVN. Keeps the necessary
QA to a minimum (i.e. only QA when developing the content, not out in
"stage")
If this gets onerous or problematic, we can change. So far, it's
just so simple...
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
Re: svn commit: r216147 - in /geronimo/site: docs/index.html xdocs/index.xml
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <jl...@apache.org>.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> One is the source (.xml) one is the rendered .html.
>
> Have you looked at the two files? There is navigation added around the
> content (index.xml) to produce the page itself (index.html)
Well, I was really asking why we have to maintain two files instead of
one since the html one is just a product of XSLT processing of the
source file - index.xml.
I remember a talk about a already-prepared site content so that in case
of troubles infra people would check them out and easily populate
damaged site content. Is that just for that?
> geir
Jacek
Re: svn commit: r216147 - in /geronimo/site: docs/index.html xdocs/index.xml
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>.
On Jul 13, 2005, at 2:28 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> geirm@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: geirm
>> Date: Wed Jul 13 05:21:42 2005
>> New Revision: 216147
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=216147&view=rev
>> Log:
>> added news item about JBI/ESB in Geronimo Modified:
>> geronimo/site/docs/index.html
>> geronimo/site/xdocs/index.xml
>>
>
> Why do we need to maintain two different file formats with almost
> identical content?
One is the source (.xml) one is the rendered .html.
Have you looked at the two files? There is navigation added around
the content (index.xml) to produce the page itself (index.html)
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org