You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/05/18 08:15:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8321) Allow composite readers to have more than 2B documents

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16480325#comment-16480325 ] 

Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8321:
-----------------------------------------

I like this idea a lot. It's progress over perfection and it would simplify the accounting in IW dramatically (on the other hand I think it's nice to have this accounting for assertion purposes ie. just to make sure we have correct counts)!!

> Allow composite readers to have more than 2B documents
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-8321
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8321
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I would like to start discussing removing the limit of ~2B documents that we have for indices, while still enforcing it at the segment level for practical reasons.
> Postings, stored fields, and all other codec APIs would keep working on integers to represent doc ids. Only top-level doc ids and numbers of documents would need to move to a long. I say "only" because we now mostly consume indices per-segment, but there is still a number of places where we identify documents by their top-level doc ID like {{IndexReader#document}}, top-docs collectors, etc.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org