You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> on 2014/04/18 09:43:19 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Dear community,
I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3.
Changes since last round:
* https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.6.x
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get
stuck in!
The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz
wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.asc
wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.ish
wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.md5
wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.sha
Please follow the test procedure here:
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
Please remember that "rc.3" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.6.0.
Please cast your votes now.
Thanks,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Robert Kowalski <ro...@kowalski.gd>.
All OK for me, OSX 10.9.2 and Erlang R16B03
Best,
Robert
2014-04-18 11:20 GMT+02:00 Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org>:
> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
>
> 21/87
> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js
> ... FAIL
> 26/87
> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js
> ... FAIL
>
> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run
> ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other times
> they fail. I'm on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
>
> Cheers
> Garren
>
> On 18 Apr 2014, at 10:38 AM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Gentoo Linux Erlang R16B03-1
> > FreeBSD 9 Erlang R15B02
> > FreeBSD 10 Eralng R16B02
> > ALL Spidermonkey 1.8.5
> >
> > Sigs ok, hashes ok, tests ok, +1 SHIP IT \o/
> >
> > (:
> >
> > --
> > ,,,^..^,,,
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>
> wrote:
> >> Dear community,
> >>
> >> I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3.
> >>
> >> Changes since last round:
> >>
> >> *
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.6.x
> >>
> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> >> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
> >> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get
> >> stuck in!
> >>
> >> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
> >>
> >> wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz
> >> wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.asc
> >> wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.ish
> >> wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.md5
> >> wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.sha
> >>
> >> Please follow the test procedure here:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
> >>
> >> Please remember that "rc.3" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
> >> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.6.0.
> >>
> >> Please cast your votes now.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Dirkjan
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Wendall Cada <we...@apache.org>.
This appears to be fixed, passes for me everywhere.
Wendall
On 04/29/2014 06:55 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote:
> Issue with 231-cors.t is fixed
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;h=0bb567f
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>>>> R14B04
>>>>> Sigs: OK
>>>>> Hashes: OK
>>>>> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
>>>>> Failed test: 27
>>>>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
>>>>> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
>>>>> Result: FAIL
>>>>> Install/Run: OK
>>>>> Verify: OK
>>>> Reproduced on Gentoo and FreeBSD with R14B04. That's gonna be funny.
>>> $ ./test/etap/run -v ./test/etap/231-cors.t
>>> [17:04:39] ▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸
>>> ./test/etap/231-cors.t ..
>>> ./test/etap/231-cors.t:429: Warning: variable 'Else' is unused
>>> # Current time local 2014-04-29 17:04:44
>>> # Using etap version "0.3.4"
>>> 1..26
>>> Apache CouchDB 0.0.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
>>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
>>> [info] [<0.2.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:24981/
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
>>> ok 1 - No CORS Headers when disabled
>>> [info] [<0.89.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>>> ok 2 - No CORS Headers when disabled
>>> [info] [<0.90.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
>>> ok 3 - Specified invalid origin, no Access
>>> [info] [<0.91.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>>> ok 4 - invalid origin
>>> [info] [<0.92.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>>> ok 5 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>>> [info] [<0.93.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>>> ok 6 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
>>> ok 7 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
>>> [info] [<0.94.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc1/attachment.txt 201
>>> [info] [<0.95.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc1?attachments=true 200
>>> ok 8 - Response without errors
>>> [info] [<0.96.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 201
>>> [info] [<0.97.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 206
>>> ok 9 - Response without errors
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
>>> ok 10 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
>>> ok 11 - db origin ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>>> ok 12 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>>> ok 13 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 200
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 304
>>> ok 14 - Responded with Not Modified
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>>> ok 15 - check host:port in origin ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>>> ok 16 - check scheme in origin ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>>> ok 17 - db origin ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>>> ok 18 - db access config case mismatch
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>>> ok 19 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials off
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>>> ok 20 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>>> ok 21 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>>> ok 22 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
>>> ok 23 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
>>> ok 24 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
>>> ok 25 - db origin ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>>> ok 26 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
>>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>>> ok 27 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
>>> # Test died abnormally: {'EXIT',
>>> {function_clause,
>>> [{couch_passwords,hash_admin_password,["test"]},
>>> {erl_eval,do_apply,5},
>>> {erl_eval,expr,5},
>>> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
>>> {erl_eval,local_func,5},
>>> {erl_eval,expr,5},
>>> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
>>> {erl_eval,local_func,5}]}}
>>> [error] [<0.31.0>] {error_report,<0.23.0>,
>>> {<0.31.0>,crash_report,
>>> [[{initial_call,{etap,start_etap_server,[]}},
>>> {pid,<0.31.0>},
>>> {registered_name,etap_server},
>>> {error_info,
>>> {error,badarg,
>>> [{io,format,
>>> [<0.23.0>,"~s~n",
>>> [[66,97,105,108,32,111,117,116,33,32|
>>> {'EXIT',
>>> {function_clause,
>>> [{couch_passwords,hash_admin_password,
>>> ["test"]},
>>> {erl_eval,do_apply,5},
>>> {erl_eval,expr,5},
>>> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
>>> {erl_eval,local_func,5},
>>> {erl_eval,expr,5},
>>> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
>>> {erl_eval,local_func,5}]}}]]]},
>>> {etap,test_server,1},
>>> {proc_lib,init_p_do_apply,3}]}},
>>> {ancestors,[<0.2.0>]},
>>> {messages,[done]},
>>> {links,[]},
>>> {dictionary,[]},
>>> {trap_exit,false},
>>> {status,running},
>>> {heap_size,2584},
>>> {stack_size,24},
>>> {reductions,1177}],
>>> []]}}
>>> All 26 subtests passed
>> Oh..run the same on R17, twice (but still reproducible from time to time):
>>
>> couchdb $ ./test/etap/run -v ./test/etap/231-cors.t
>> ./test/etap/231-cors.t ..
>> ./test/etap/231-cors.t:429: Warning: variable 'Else' is unused
>> # Current time local 2014-04-29 13:11:52
>> # Using etap version "0.3.4"
>> 1..26
>> Apache CouchDB 0.0.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
>> [info] [<0.2.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:44066/
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
>> ok 1 - No CORS Headers when disabled
>> [info] [<0.66.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 2 - No CORS Headers when disabled
>> [info] [<0.67.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
>> ok 3 - Specified invalid origin, no Access
>> [info] [<0.68.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 4 - invalid origin
>> [info] [<0.69.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 5 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.70.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 6 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
>> ok 7 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
>> [info] [<0.71.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc1/attachment.txt 201
>> [info] [<0.72.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc1?attachments=true 200
>> ok 8 - Response without errors
>> [info] [<0.73.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 201
>> [info] [<0.74.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 206
>> ok 9 - Response without errors
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
>> ok 10 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
>> ok 11 - db origin ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 12 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 13 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 200
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 304
>> ok 14 - Responded with Not Modified
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 15 - check host:port in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 16 - check scheme in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 17 - db origin ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 18 - db access config case mismatch
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 19 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials off
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 20 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 21 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 22 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
>> ok 23 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
>> ok 24 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
>> ok 25 - db origin ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 26 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 27 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
>> All 26 subtests passed
>>
>> Test Summary Report
>> -------------------
>> ./test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
>> Failed test: 27
>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
>> Files=1, Tests=27, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 0.74 cusr
>> 0.25 csys = 1.07 CPU)
>> Result: FAIL
>>
>>
>> $ ./test/etap/run -v ./test/etap/231-cors.t
>> ./test/etap/231-cors.t ..
>> ./test/etap/231-cors.t:429: Warning: variable 'Else' is unused
>> # Current time local 2014-04-29 13:12:27
>> # Using etap version "0.3.4"
>> 1..26
>> Apache CouchDB 0.0.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
>> [info] [<0.2.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:40513/
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
>> ok 1 - No CORS Headers when disabled
>> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 2 - No CORS Headers when disabled
>> [info] [<0.66.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
>> ok 3 - Specified invalid origin, no Access
>> [info] [<0.67.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 4 - invalid origin
>> [info] [<0.68.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 5 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.69.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 6 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
>> ok 7 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
>> [info] [<0.70.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc1/attachment.txt 201
>> [info] [<0.71.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc1?attachments=true 200
>> ok 8 - Response without errors
>> [info] [<0.72.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 201
>> [info] [<0.73.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 206
>> ok 9 - Response without errors
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
>> ok 10 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
>> ok 11 - db origin ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 12 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 13 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 200
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 304
>> ok 14 - Responded with Not Modified
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 15 - check host:port in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 16 - check scheme in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 17 - db origin ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 18 - db access config case mismatch
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 19 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials off
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 20 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 21 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 22 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
>> ok 23 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
>> ok 24 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
>> ok 25 - db origin ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 26 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok
>> All tests successful.
>> Files=1, Tests=26, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.01 sys + 0.76 cusr
>> 0.27 csys = 1.10 CPU)
>> Result: PASS
>>
>> Looks like yet another floating issue which isn't floating for R14.
>>
>> --
>> ,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
Issue with 231-cors.t is fixed
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;h=0bb567f
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>>> R14B04
>>>> Sigs: OK
>>>> Hashes: OK
>>>> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
>>>> Failed test: 27
>>>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
>>>> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
>>>> Result: FAIL
>>>> Install/Run: OK
>>>> Verify: OK
>>>
>>> Reproduced on Gentoo and FreeBSD with R14B04. That's gonna be funny.
>>
>> $ ./test/etap/run -v ./test/etap/231-cors.t
>> [17:04:39] ▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸
>> ./test/etap/231-cors.t ..
>> ./test/etap/231-cors.t:429: Warning: variable 'Else' is unused
>> # Current time local 2014-04-29 17:04:44
>> # Using etap version "0.3.4"
>> 1..26
>> Apache CouchDB 0.0.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
>> [info] [<0.2.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:24981/
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
>> ok 1 - No CORS Headers when disabled
>> [info] [<0.89.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 2 - No CORS Headers when disabled
>> [info] [<0.90.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
>> ok 3 - Specified invalid origin, no Access
>> [info] [<0.91.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 4 - invalid origin
>> [info] [<0.92.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 5 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.93.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 6 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
>> ok 7 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
>> [info] [<0.94.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc1/attachment.txt 201
>> [info] [<0.95.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc1?attachments=true 200
>> ok 8 - Response without errors
>> [info] [<0.96.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 201
>> [info] [<0.97.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 206
>> ok 9 - Response without errors
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
>> ok 10 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
>> ok 11 - db origin ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 12 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 13 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 200
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 304
>> ok 14 - Responded with Not Modified
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 15 - check host:port in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 16 - check scheme in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 17 - db origin ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 18 - db access config case mismatch
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 19 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials off
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 20 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
>> ok 21 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
>> ok 22 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
>> ok 23 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
>> ok 24 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
>> ok 25 - db origin ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 26 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
>> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
>> ok 27 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
>> # Test died abnormally: {'EXIT',
>> {function_clause,
>> [{couch_passwords,hash_admin_password,["test"]},
>> {erl_eval,do_apply,5},
>> {erl_eval,expr,5},
>> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
>> {erl_eval,local_func,5},
>> {erl_eval,expr,5},
>> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
>> {erl_eval,local_func,5}]}}
>> [error] [<0.31.0>] {error_report,<0.23.0>,
>> {<0.31.0>,crash_report,
>> [[{initial_call,{etap,start_etap_server,[]}},
>> {pid,<0.31.0>},
>> {registered_name,etap_server},
>> {error_info,
>> {error,badarg,
>> [{io,format,
>> [<0.23.0>,"~s~n",
>> [[66,97,105,108,32,111,117,116,33,32|
>> {'EXIT',
>> {function_clause,
>> [{couch_passwords,hash_admin_password,
>> ["test"]},
>> {erl_eval,do_apply,5},
>> {erl_eval,expr,5},
>> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
>> {erl_eval,local_func,5},
>> {erl_eval,expr,5},
>> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
>> {erl_eval,local_func,5}]}}]]]},
>> {etap,test_server,1},
>> {proc_lib,init_p_do_apply,3}]}},
>> {ancestors,[<0.2.0>]},
>> {messages,[done]},
>> {links,[]},
>> {dictionary,[]},
>> {trap_exit,false},
>> {status,running},
>> {heap_size,2584},
>> {stack_size,24},
>> {reductions,1177}],
>> []]}}
>> All 26 subtests passed
>
> Oh..run the same on R17, twice (but still reproducible from time to time):
>
> couchdb $ ./test/etap/run -v ./test/etap/231-cors.t
> ./test/etap/231-cors.t ..
> ./test/etap/231-cors.t:429: Warning: variable 'Else' is unused
> # Current time local 2014-04-29 13:11:52
> # Using etap version "0.3.4"
> 1..26
> Apache CouchDB 0.0.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
> [info] [<0.2.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:44066/
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
> ok 1 - No CORS Headers when disabled
> [info] [<0.66.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 2 - No CORS Headers when disabled
> [info] [<0.67.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
> ok 3 - Specified invalid origin, no Access
> [info] [<0.68.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 4 - invalid origin
> [info] [<0.69.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 5 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.70.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 6 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
> ok 7 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
> [info] [<0.71.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc1/attachment.txt 201
> [info] [<0.72.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc1?attachments=true 200
> ok 8 - Response without errors
> [info] [<0.73.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 201
> [info] [<0.74.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 206
> ok 9 - Response without errors
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
> ok 10 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
> ok 11 - db origin ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 12 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 13 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 200
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 304
> ok 14 - Responded with Not Modified
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 15 - check host:port in origin ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 16 - check scheme in origin ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 17 - db origin ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 18 - db access config case mismatch
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 19 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials off
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 20 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 21 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 22 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
> ok 23 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
> ok 24 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
> ok 25 - db origin ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 26 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 27 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
> All 26 subtests passed
>
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> ./test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
> Failed test: 27
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
> Files=1, Tests=27, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 0.74 cusr
> 0.25 csys = 1.07 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
>
>
> $ ./test/etap/run -v ./test/etap/231-cors.t
> ./test/etap/231-cors.t ..
> ./test/etap/231-cors.t:429: Warning: variable 'Else' is unused
> # Current time local 2014-04-29 13:12:27
> # Using etap version "0.3.4"
> 1..26
> Apache CouchDB 0.0.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
> [info] [<0.2.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:40513/
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
> ok 1 - No CORS Headers when disabled
> [info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 2 - No CORS Headers when disabled
> [info] [<0.66.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
> ok 3 - Specified invalid origin, no Access
> [info] [<0.67.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 4 - invalid origin
> [info] [<0.68.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 5 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.69.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 6 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
> ok 7 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
> [info] [<0.70.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc1/attachment.txt 201
> [info] [<0.71.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc1?attachments=true 200
> ok 8 - Response without errors
> [info] [<0.72.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 201
> [info] [<0.73.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 206
> ok 9 - Response without errors
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
> ok 10 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
> ok 11 - db origin ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 12 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 13 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 200
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 304
> ok 14 - Responded with Not Modified
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 15 - check host:port in origin ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 16 - check scheme in origin ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 17 - db origin ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 18 - db access config case mismatch
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 19 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials off
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 20 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 21 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 22 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
> ok 23 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
> ok 24 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
> ok 25 - db origin ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 26 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
> [info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok
> All tests successful.
> Files=1, Tests=26, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.01 sys + 0.76 cusr
> 0.27 csys = 1.10 CPU)
> Result: PASS
>
> Looks like yet another floating issue which isn't floating for R14.
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>> R14B04
>>> Sigs: OK
>>> Hashes: OK
>>> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
>>> Failed test: 27
>>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
>>> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
>>> Result: FAIL
>>> Install/Run: OK
>>> Verify: OK
>>
>> Reproduced on Gentoo and FreeBSD with R14B04. That's gonna be funny.
>
> $ ./test/etap/run -v ./test/etap/231-cors.t
> [17:04:39] ▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸
> ./test/etap/231-cors.t ..
> ./test/etap/231-cors.t:429: Warning: variable 'Else' is unused
> # Current time local 2014-04-29 17:04:44
> # Using etap version "0.3.4"
> 1..26
> Apache CouchDB 0.0.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
> [info] [<0.2.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:24981/
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
> ok 1 - No CORS Headers when disabled
> [info] [<0.89.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 2 - No CORS Headers when disabled
> [info] [<0.90.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
> ok 3 - Specified invalid origin, no Access
> [info] [<0.91.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 4 - invalid origin
> [info] [<0.92.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 5 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.93.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 6 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
> ok 7 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
> [info] [<0.94.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc1/attachment.txt 201
> [info] [<0.95.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc1?attachments=true 200
> ok 8 - Response without errors
> [info] [<0.96.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 201
> [info] [<0.97.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 206
> ok 9 - Response without errors
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
> ok 10 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
> ok 11 - db origin ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 12 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 13 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 200
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 304
> ok 14 - Responded with Not Modified
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 15 - check host:port in origin ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 16 - check scheme in origin ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 17 - db origin ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 18 - db access config case mismatch
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 19 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials off
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 20 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
> ok 21 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
> ok 22 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
> ok 23 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
> ok 24 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
> ok 25 - db origin ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 26 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
> [info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
> ok 27 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
> # Test died abnormally: {'EXIT',
> {function_clause,
> [{couch_passwords,hash_admin_password,["test"]},
> {erl_eval,do_apply,5},
> {erl_eval,expr,5},
> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
> {erl_eval,local_func,5},
> {erl_eval,expr,5},
> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
> {erl_eval,local_func,5}]}}
> [error] [<0.31.0>] {error_report,<0.23.0>,
> {<0.31.0>,crash_report,
> [[{initial_call,{etap,start_etap_server,[]}},
> {pid,<0.31.0>},
> {registered_name,etap_server},
> {error_info,
> {error,badarg,
> [{io,format,
> [<0.23.0>,"~s~n",
> [[66,97,105,108,32,111,117,116,33,32|
> {'EXIT',
> {function_clause,
> [{couch_passwords,hash_admin_password,
> ["test"]},
> {erl_eval,do_apply,5},
> {erl_eval,expr,5},
> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
> {erl_eval,local_func,5},
> {erl_eval,expr,5},
> {escript,eval_exprs,5},
> {erl_eval,local_func,5}]}}]]]},
> {etap,test_server,1},
> {proc_lib,init_p_do_apply,3}]}},
> {ancestors,[<0.2.0>]},
> {messages,[done]},
> {links,[]},
> {dictionary,[]},
> {trap_exit,false},
> {status,running},
> {heap_size,2584},
> {stack_size,24},
> {reductions,1177}],
> []]}}
> All 26 subtests passed
Oh..run the same on R17, twice (but still reproducible from time to time):
couchdb $ ./test/etap/run -v ./test/etap/231-cors.t
./test/etap/231-cors.t ..
./test/etap/231-cors.t:429: Warning: variable 'Else' is unused
# Current time local 2014-04-29 13:11:52
# Using etap version "0.3.4"
1..26
Apache CouchDB 0.0.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
[info] [<0.2.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:44066/
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
ok 1 - No CORS Headers when disabled
[info] [<0.66.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 2 - No CORS Headers when disabled
[info] [<0.67.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
ok 3 - Specified invalid origin, no Access
[info] [<0.68.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 4 - invalid origin
[info] [<0.69.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 5 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.70.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 6 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
ok 7 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
[info] [<0.71.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc1/attachment.txt 201
[info] [<0.72.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc1?attachments=true 200
ok 8 - Response without errors
[info] [<0.73.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 201
[info] [<0.74.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 206
ok 9 - Response without errors
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
ok 10 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
ok 11 - db origin ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 12 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 13 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 200
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 304
ok 14 - Responded with Not Modified
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 15 - check host:port in origin ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 16 - check scheme in origin ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 17 - db origin ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 18 - db access config case mismatch
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 19 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials off
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 20 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 21 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 22 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
ok 23 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
ok 24 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
ok 25 - db origin ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 26 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 27 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
All 26 subtests passed
Test Summary Report
-------------------
./test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 27
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
Files=1, Tests=27, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 0.74 cusr
0.25 csys = 1.07 CPU)
Result: FAIL
$ ./test/etap/run -v ./test/etap/231-cors.t
./test/etap/231-cors.t ..
./test/etap/231-cors.t:429: Warning: variable 'Else' is unused
# Current time local 2014-04-29 13:12:27
# Using etap version "0.3.4"
1..26
Apache CouchDB 0.0.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
[info] [<0.2.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:40513/
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
ok 1 - No CORS Headers when disabled
[info] [<0.65.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 2 - No CORS Headers when disabled
[info] [<0.66.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
ok 3 - Specified invalid origin, no Access
[info] [<0.67.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 4 - invalid origin
[info] [<0.68.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 5 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.69.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 6 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
ok 7 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
[info] [<0.70.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc1/attachment.txt 201
[info] [<0.71.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc1?attachments=true 200
ok 8 - Response without errors
[info] [<0.72.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 201
[info] [<0.73.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 206
ok 9 - Response without errors
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
ok 10 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
ok 11 - db origin ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 12 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 13 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 200
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 304
ok 14 - Responded with Not Modified
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 15 - check host:port in origin ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 16 - check scheme in origin ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 17 - db origin ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 18 - db access config case mismatch
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 19 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials off
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 20 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 21 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 22 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
ok 23 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
ok 24 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
ok 25 - db origin ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 26 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
[info] [<0.64.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=26, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.01 sys + 0.76 cusr
0.27 csys = 1.10 CPU)
Result: PASS
Looks like yet another floating issue which isn't floating for R14.
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>> R14B04
>> Sigs: OK
>> Hashes: OK
>> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
>> Failed test: 27
>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
>> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
>> Result: FAIL
>> Install/Run: OK
>> Verify: OK
>
> Reproduced on Gentoo and FreeBSD with R14B04. That's gonna be funny.
$ ./test/etap/run -v ./test/etap/231-cors.t
[17:04:39] ▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸▸
./test/etap/231-cors.t ..
./test/etap/231-cors.t:429: Warning: variable 'Else' is unused
# Current time local 2014-04-29 17:04:44
# Using etap version "0.3.4"
1..26
Apache CouchDB 0.0.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
[info] [<0.2.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:24981/
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
ok 1 - No CORS Headers when disabled
[info] [<0.89.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 2 - No CORS Headers when disabled
[info] [<0.90.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET / 200
ok 3 - Specified invalid origin, no Access
[info] [<0.91.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 4 - invalid origin
[info] [<0.92.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 5 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.93.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 6 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
ok 7 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
[info] [<0.94.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc1/attachment.txt 201
[info] [<0.95.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc1?attachments=true 200
ok 8 - Response without errors
[info] [<0.96.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - PUT /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 201
[info] [<0.97.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2/attachment.bin 206
ok 9 - Response without errors
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
ok 10 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
ok 11 - db origin ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 12 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 13 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 200
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db/doc2 304
ok 14 - Responded with Not Modified
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 15 - check host:port in origin ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 16 - check scheme in origin ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 17 - db origin ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 18 - db access config case mismatch
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 19 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials off
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 20 - db Access-Control-Allow-Credentials ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 204
ok 21 - test_preflight_request Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db 200
ok 22 - db Access-Control-Allow-Origin ok
ok 23 - db Access-Control-Expose-Headers ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS /etap-test-db 204
ok 24 - db Access-Control-Allow-Methods ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - GET /etap-test-db1 200
ok 25 - db origin ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 26 - check non defined host:port in origin ok
[info] [<0.88.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - OPTIONS / 405
ok 27 - check non defined scheme in origin ok
# Test died abnormally: {'EXIT',
{function_clause,
[{couch_passwords,hash_admin_password,["test"]},
{erl_eval,do_apply,5},
{erl_eval,expr,5},
{escript,eval_exprs,5},
{erl_eval,local_func,5},
{erl_eval,expr,5},
{escript,eval_exprs,5},
{erl_eval,local_func,5}]}}
[error] [<0.31.0>] {error_report,<0.23.0>,
{<0.31.0>,crash_report,
[[{initial_call,{etap,start_etap_server,[]}},
{pid,<0.31.0>},
{registered_name,etap_server},
{error_info,
{error,badarg,
[{io,format,
[<0.23.0>,"~s~n",
[[66,97,105,108,32,111,117,116,33,32|
{'EXIT',
{function_clause,
[{couch_passwords,hash_admin_password,
["test"]},
{erl_eval,do_apply,5},
{erl_eval,expr,5},
{escript,eval_exprs,5},
{erl_eval,local_func,5},
{erl_eval,expr,5},
{escript,eval_exprs,5},
{erl_eval,local_func,5}]}}]]]},
{etap,test_server,1},
{proc_lib,init_p_do_apply,3}]}},
{ancestors,[<0.2.0>]},
{messages,[done]},
{links,[]},
{dictionary,[]},
{trap_exit,false},
{status,running},
{heap_size,2584},
{stack_size,24},
{reductions,1177}],
[]]}}
All 26 subtests passed
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
> R14B04
> Sigs: OK
> Hashes: OK
> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
> Failed test: 27
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> Install/Run: OK
> Verify: OK
Reproduced on Gentoo and FreeBSD with R14B04. That's gonna be funny.
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de>.
yes +1 for SHIPPING :)
On 29 April 2014 13:44, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> erm and +1 for the record.
>
--
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!
http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
erm and +1 for the record.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
Here's my results so far:
sigs, hashes all OK.
debian 7.4 x64 -- OK (using default libraries from debian)
OSX Mavericks -- OK (using default libraries via homebrew)
No failures seen in the various output either. I've not repeated
James' failures but I have seen this occasionally during dev cycles,
without seeing anything specific.
I'm unable to build R14B04 via kerl on OSX btw, since Mavericks
upgrade. If you succeed do let me know.
I would suggest to the Release Manager that if others using James'
environment (OSX I guess, kerl-built R14B01 etc, any other details?)
*can't* trigger this issue, we ship. Thoughts?
A+
Dave
On 28 April 2014 15:08, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
>> Slowly, the 1.6.0 release is starting to have some "magical barriers" and
>> fighting against us ...
>
> Yeah, it's pretty frustrating.
>
> What are we going to do here, folks?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
>> Slowly, the 1.6.0 release is starting to have some "magical barriers" and
>> fighting against us ...
>
> Yeah, it's pretty frustrating.
>
> What are we going to do here, folks?
I got a two boxes with R14 erlang. Will run distcheck and see what can
do during this evening. Will send status report about back.
As for JS tests. No idea. Better to ignore if no one else could
reproduce unless more info will be provided.
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
> Slowly, the 1.6.0 release is starting to have some "magical barriers" and
> fighting against us ...
Yeah, it's pretty frustrating.
What are we going to do here, folks?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de>.
James,
did you have the chance to have a look at the problem?
Slowly, the 1.6.0 release is starting to have some "magical barriers" and
fighting against us ...
Thanks everybody for all your incessantly work!
Cheers
Andy
On 23 April 2014 11:03, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
> well, bummer. Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get:
> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t
> .......... Failed 4/16 subtests
>
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t
> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
> Failed tests: 9, 12-13, 15
> Files=7, Tests=1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr 0.09 sys + 155.32 cusr
> 13.16 csys = 169.38 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> make[3]: *** [check] Error 1
>
> Unfortunately, I’m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for
> the rest of the week. I’ll see if I can maybe look closer at what’s going
> on locally while on the flight.
>
> </JamesM>
>
> On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:28, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>
> > It did but others appeared which leads me to suspect my local install of
> erlang, given what it takes to get R14 to build with clang.
> >
> > Failed 4/16 subtests
> >
> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t
> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
> > Failed tests: 9, 11, 13, 15
> > Result: FAIL
> >
> > deleted everything and rerunning, lets see if the same tests fail.
> >
> > </JamesM>
> >
> > On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:17, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> R14B04 should be fine (B02 is certainly not, though) and does have some
> important (but rare) bugfixes over B01. The strong recommendation for
> R14B01 comes from Cloudant. We run R14B01 and have for years, we trust it
> to work (and we trust it to fail in various known ways). I’m curious to
> know if the test issue vanishes on B01, though.
> >>
> >> B.
> >>
> >> On 23 Apr 2014, at 08:47, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I’m going back now and running against R14B01 (the usual
> recommendation) instead of R14B04. Could be something odd between 01 and
> 04 and also this error was on OSX 10.9 not linux, so I’d stop short of
> saying that all of R14 is borked.
> >>>
> >>> </JamesM>
> >>>
> >>> On Apr 23, 2014, at 0:35, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> What do we make of these?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 21/87
> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js
> ... FAIL
> >>>>> 26/87
> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js
> … FAIL
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run
> ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other times
> they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
> >>>>
> >>>> I think the fact that that you "get dist check passing" even though
> >>>> some tests fail is pretty worrying. But apparently either no one is
> >>>> reproducing these failures or no one is seeing them (since distcheck
> >>>> passes anyway)?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> R14B04
> >>>>> Sigs: OK
> >>>>> Hashes: OK
> >>>>> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27
> Failed: 1)
> >>>>> Failed test: 27
> >>>>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
> >>>>> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys +
> 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
> >>>>> Result: FAIL
> >>>>> Install/Run: OK
> >>>>> Verify: OK
> >>>>
> >>>> So this works on R15, R16, but not R14? Isn't this what we fixed
> since rc.2?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Dirkjan
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
--
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!
http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
According the comments around the code I was hope so, but suddenly the
issue is looks like OTP-9167 and acts as OTP-9167 - I'm not sure how
to classify it else then OTP-9167. However, I also have a feeling that
some code is missed around this note:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/blob/master/src/couch_replicator/src/couch_replicator.erl#L299
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hrm, OTP-9167 was reported by Filipe, the main author of the current couchdb replicator, and he also changed how this was handled in couchdb to compensate. This is some ancient stuff, hard to believe it’s the cause of our latest issue. I must be missing something.
>
> On 4 May 2014, at 12:46, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>>>> well, bummer. Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get:
>>>>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t .......... Failed 4/16 subtests
>>>>>
>>>>> Test Summary Report
>>>>> -------------------
>>>>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
>>>>> Failed tests: 9, 12-13, 15
>>>>> Files=7, Tests=1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr 0.09 sys + 155.32 cusr 13.16 csys = 169.38 CPU)
>>>>> Result: FAIL
>>>>> make[3]: *** [check] Error 1
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, I’m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for the rest of the week. I’ll see if I can maybe look closer at what’s going on locally while on the flight.
>>>>
>>>> I'm failed to reproduce this with R14B04, but will try to R14B01 as you have.
>>>
>>> Confirmed for R14B01.
>>
>> Ok, I've found the roots of this issue. It's even named as OTP-9167 as
>> was fixed in R14B03 and because of it 07-use-checkpoints.t fails for
>> R14B01: it couldn't run replicator worker with new child spec where
>> use_checkpoint bit flipped because supervisor hold the initial one, it
>> see that there replication with the same id going to happen and
>> restarts it with the old spec ignoring any changes. I could fix the
>> test, but I couldn't fix the issue in root and not sure that it's
>> worths to search for any workarounds nowdays (R14B03 was released at
>> 2011-05-24, almost 3 years ago).
>>
>> However, here are three solutions that I have:
>>
>> 0. Do nothing.
>> 1. Isolate tests from each other to hide the issue (isolation is good,
>> but hiding bugs is bad):
>> https://www.friendpaste.com/1lnTEFg6RId5PDRAmvbBVO
>> 2. On test failure check Erlang version and note that this failure is
>> *fine* for specific versions:
>> https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSL7G
>> 3. Add "+no_checkpoints" suffix to replication id if "use_checkpoints:
>> false" was specified. Thus, it solves the problem:
>> https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSKpT (yes, some
>> refactoring love is required)
>> But I'm not sure that this is good idea.
>>
>> Personally, I would prefer to keep this "bug" alive as reminder that
>> things for your Erlang version *could* happens wrong. Your thoughts?
>>
>>
>> --
>> ,,,^..^,,,
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>.
Hrm, OTP-9167 was reported by Filipe, the main author of the current couchdb replicator, and he also changed how this was handled in couchdb to compensate. This is some ancient stuff, hard to believe it’s the cause of our latest issue. I must be missing something.
On 4 May 2014, at 12:46, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>>> well, bummer. Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get:
>>>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t .......... Failed 4/16 subtests
>>>>
>>>> Test Summary Report
>>>> -------------------
>>>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
>>>> Failed tests: 9, 12-13, 15
>>>> Files=7, Tests=1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr 0.09 sys + 155.32 cusr 13.16 csys = 169.38 CPU)
>>>> Result: FAIL
>>>> make[3]: *** [check] Error 1
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, I’m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for the rest of the week. I’ll see if I can maybe look closer at what’s going on locally while on the flight.
>>>
>>> I'm failed to reproduce this with R14B04, but will try to R14B01 as you have.
>>
>> Confirmed for R14B01.
>
> Ok, I've found the roots of this issue. It's even named as OTP-9167 as
> was fixed in R14B03 and because of it 07-use-checkpoints.t fails for
> R14B01: it couldn't run replicator worker with new child spec where
> use_checkpoint bit flipped because supervisor hold the initial one, it
> see that there replication with the same id going to happen and
> restarts it with the old spec ignoring any changes. I could fix the
> test, but I couldn't fix the issue in root and not sure that it's
> worths to search for any workarounds nowdays (R14B03 was released at
> 2011-05-24, almost 3 years ago).
>
> However, here are three solutions that I have:
>
> 0. Do nothing.
> 1. Isolate tests from each other to hide the issue (isolation is good,
> but hiding bugs is bad):
> https://www.friendpaste.com/1lnTEFg6RId5PDRAmvbBVO
> 2. On test failure check Erlang version and note that this failure is
> *fine* for specific versions:
> https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSL7G
> 3. Add "+no_checkpoints" suffix to replication id if "use_checkpoints:
> false" was specified. Thus, it solves the problem:
> https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSKpT (yes, some
> refactoring love is required)
> But I'm not sure that this is good idea.
>
> Personally, I would prefer to keep this "bug" alive as reminder that
> things for your Erlang version *could* happens wrong. Your thoughts?
>
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
Thanks!
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Joan Touzet <jo...@atypical.net> wrote:
> Done.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dirkjan Ochtman" <di...@ochtman.nl>
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2014 12:52:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
>
> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Joan Touzet <jo...@atypical.net> wrote:
>> It has not been cherry picked, no. I was waiting for your explicit
>> approval. :)
>
> We're talking about this one, right?
>
> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/commit/e348d4f2da082cee52d11efc6fbc94f1d8a047c9
>
> If so, please cherry-pick it (or I can do it tomorrow).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>
>>
>> -Joan
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dirkjan Ochtman" <di...@ochtman.nl>
>> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
>> Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2014 11:46:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
>>
>> On May 4, 2014 1:47 PM, "Alexander Shorin" <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2. On test failure check Erlang version and note that this failure is
>>> *fine* for specific versions:
>>> https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSL7G
>>
>> I like this. Do we have a notion of skipping tests, and can we skip
>> depending on Erlang version?
>>
>> Joan, is the startup script fix you wanted in 1.6.0 cherry picked yet?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Joan Touzet <jo...@atypical.net>.
Done.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dirkjan Ochtman" <di...@ochtman.nl>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2014 12:52:23 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Joan Touzet <jo...@atypical.net> wrote:
> It has not been cherry picked, no. I was waiting for your explicit
> approval. :)
We're talking about this one, right?
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/commit/e348d4f2da082cee52d11efc6fbc94f1d8a047c9
If so, please cherry-pick it (or I can do it tomorrow).
Cheers,
Dirkjan
>
> -Joan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dirkjan Ochtman" <di...@ochtman.nl>
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2014 11:46:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
>
> On May 4, 2014 1:47 PM, "Alexander Shorin" <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2. On test failure check Erlang version and note that this failure is
>> *fine* for specific versions:
>> https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSL7G
>
> I like this. Do we have a notion of skipping tests, and can we skip
> depending on Erlang version?
>
> Joan, is the startup script fix you wanted in 1.6.0 cherry picked yet?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Joan Touzet <jo...@atypical.net> wrote:
> It has not been cherry picked, no. I was waiting for your explicit
> approval. :)
We're talking about this one, right?
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/commit/e348d4f2da082cee52d11efc6fbc94f1d8a047c9
If so, please cherry-pick it (or I can do it tomorrow).
Cheers,
Dirkjan
>
> -Joan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dirkjan Ochtman" <di...@ochtman.nl>
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2014 11:46:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
>
> On May 4, 2014 1:47 PM, "Alexander Shorin" <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2. On test failure check Erlang version and note that this failure is
>> *fine* for specific versions:
>> https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSL7G
>
> I like this. Do we have a notion of skipping tests, and can we skip
> depending on Erlang version?
>
> Joan, is the startup script fix you wanted in 1.6.0 cherry picked yet?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Joan Touzet <jo...@atypical.net>.
It has not been cherry picked, no. I was waiting for your explicit
approval. :)
-Joan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dirkjan Ochtman" <di...@ochtman.nl>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2014 11:46:25 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
On May 4, 2014 1:47 PM, "Alexander Shorin" <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2. On test failure check Erlang version and note that this failure is
> *fine* for specific versions:
> https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSL7G
I like this. Do we have a notion of skipping tests, and can we skip
depending on Erlang version?
Joan, is the startup script fix you wanted in 1.6.0 cherry picked yet?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yes, we can use etap:skip() for that. Do you want to skip the test
>>> instead of let him fail with notice "why"?
>>
>> Can we skip with notice? I'd prefer to not fail it, even with a notice.
>
> Sure! Let me make a patch for this case.
Landed both on master and 1.6.x. Sorry for delay.
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/commit/8ff92865
All tests passed!
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes, we can use etap:skip() for that. Do you want to skip the test
>> instead of let him fail with notice "why"?
>
> Can we skip with notice? I'd prefer to not fail it, even with a notice.
Sure! Let me make a patch for this case.
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, we can use etap:skip() for that. Do you want to skip the test
> instead of let him fail with notice "why"?
Can we skip with notice? I'd prefer to not fail it, even with a notice.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On May 4, 2014 1:47 PM, "Alexander Shorin" <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2. On test failure check Erlang version and note that this failure is
>> *fine* for specific versions:
>> https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSL7G
>
> I like this. Do we have a notion of skipping tests, and can we skip
> depending on Erlang version?
Yes, we can use etap:skip() for that. Do you want to skip the test
instead of let him fail with notice "why"?
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On May 4, 2014 1:47 PM, "Alexander Shorin" <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2. On test failure check Erlang version and note that this failure is
> *fine* for specific versions:
> https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSL7G
I like this. Do we have a notion of skipping tests, and can we skip
depending on Erlang version?
Joan, is the startup script fix you wanted in 1.6.0 cherry picked yet?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>> well, bummer. Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get:
>>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t .......... Failed 4/16 subtests
>>>
>>> Test Summary Report
>>> -------------------
>>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
>>> Failed tests: 9, 12-13, 15
>>> Files=7, Tests=1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr 0.09 sys + 155.32 cusr 13.16 csys = 169.38 CPU)
>>> Result: FAIL
>>> make[3]: *** [check] Error 1
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I’m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for the rest of the week. I’ll see if I can maybe look closer at what’s going on locally while on the flight.
>>
>> I'm failed to reproduce this with R14B04, but will try to R14B01 as you have.
>
> Confirmed for R14B01.
Ok, I've found the roots of this issue. It's even named as OTP-9167 as
was fixed in R14B03 and because of it 07-use-checkpoints.t fails for
R14B01: it couldn't run replicator worker with new child spec where
use_checkpoint bit flipped because supervisor hold the initial one, it
see that there replication with the same id going to happen and
restarts it with the old spec ignoring any changes. I could fix the
test, but I couldn't fix the issue in root and not sure that it's
worths to search for any workarounds nowdays (R14B03 was released at
2011-05-24, almost 3 years ago).
However, here are three solutions that I have:
0. Do nothing.
1. Isolate tests from each other to hide the issue (isolation is good,
but hiding bugs is bad):
https://www.friendpaste.com/1lnTEFg6RId5PDRAmvbBVO
2. On test failure check Erlang version and note that this failure is
*fine* for specific versions:
https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSL7G
3. Add "+no_checkpoints" suffix to replication id if "use_checkpoints:
false" was specified. Thus, it solves the problem:
https://www.friendpaste.com/3TmqoNjEF3xnYtbLybSKpT (yes, some
refactoring love is required)
But I'm not sure that this is good idea.
Personally, I would prefer to keep this "bug" alive as reminder that
things for your Erlang version *could* happens wrong. Your thoughts?
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
> The way I read it, with IRC logs to back it up, is that there are changes checked in that fix these tests, yes.
>
> As such I think we need to cancel rc.3. I need to understand if Alexander is saying "confirmed *fixed* for R14B01" or not - if fixed, we can probably move swiftly to an rc.4.
No, not yet done. Btw, the error had been introduced with the initial commit:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/commit/03bc164
and it was there all the time - nobody just tested CouchDB against
such old Erlang till now. Something works these not in the way that's
expected for R14B01.
Will try to find out the issue and fix it within today and verify that
I wouldn't broke anything else. Stay tuned!
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On May 2, 2014 5:56 PM, "Joan Touzet" <wo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Discussion on IRC suggested that we not cherry pick but pull directly from
> master. This would be useful, selfishly, in that it would also pull my
> startup script fix for which we keep getting new bugs. It also means that
> we would have a 1.6.x branch that starts as a strict predecessor of master
> in the future.
Yes, but it also potentially means we keep taking destabilizing things into
the rcs. We're trying to converge on something stable (i.e. no test
failures). Obviously we do not do a good enough job of keeping master
stable, therefore I'd prefer not to keep merging everything into the
release branch.
We're supposed to have releases every month so that people never have to
wait long even if some feature or fix misses a release.
That said, I'd be happy to make an exception for your
lots-of-duplicate-bugs startup script fix, if we can deem it to be
low-risk.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by "Mutton, James" <jm...@akamai.com>.
Sounds like you guys made good progress on it in the last week. I got stuck in a big storm that hit the US South early this week and it completely screwed up my travel but I’m at least back online now. :)
Alexander, sounds like you reproduced and are close to fixing the issue. Is there an easy shortcut to running a single test like this, I would love to have been able to make some actually helpful progress in the few chances I had last week.
</JamesM>
On May 2, 2014, at 0:15, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> here is the status update: etap tests 231 and 200 were fixed on 1.6.x.
>>> The only issue left for replicator tests against R14B01.
>>> As for R14B01 issue I can provide the fix right now, but it's not
>>> very...correct. So the question is pretty simple: when you plan and
>>> will have a time to cut 1.6.0-rc4? If this will happens tomorrow so I
>>> have no reasons to hold the release. If I have day or two, I'd like to
>>> continue investigations to make fix more correct.
>>
>> Thanks for the update. I think we can hold it a little bit longer. How
>> about we say I spin an rc.4 by Monday morning my time, and if you have
>> no news on this by then we consider just living with it?
>
> Deal. Monday is good. Thanks!
>
>>> Also, seems we have Erlang 17 support in master now...not single shot
>>> was made, but looks like it build now correct. I wonder if it worth to
>>> pick this fix to 1.6.x? Since Erlang 17 is already in Gentoo, Debian,
>>> OSX and CouchDB 1.7 will be released only in June or July (hope no
>>> more 1986-like issues will happens for us) - so I think this is actual
>>> question for now.
>>
>> Hmm. How invasive has this been?
>
> Well..as usual it could be with the shell bits (:
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org>.
Discussion on IRC suggested that we not cherry pick but pull directly from
master. This would be useful, selfishly, in that it would also pull my
startup script fix for which we keep getting new bugs. It also means that
we would have a 1.6.x branch that starts as a strict predecessor of master
in the future.
-Joan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexander Shorin" <kx...@gmail.com>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Sent: Friday, May 2, 2014 3:15:17 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> here is the status update: etap tests 231 and 200 were fixed on 1.6.x.
>> The only issue left for replicator tests against R14B01.
>> As for R14B01 issue I can provide the fix right now, but it's not
>> very...correct. So the question is pretty simple: when you plan and
>> will have a time to cut 1.6.0-rc4? If this will happens tomorrow so I
>> have no reasons to hold the release. If I have day or two, I'd like to
>> continue investigations to make fix more correct.
>
> Thanks for the update. I think we can hold it a little bit longer. How
> about we say I spin an rc.4 by Monday morning my time, and if you have
> no news on this by then we consider just living with it?
Deal. Monday is good. Thanks!
>> Also, seems we have Erlang 17 support in master now...not single shot
>> was made, but looks like it build now correct. I wonder if it worth to
>> pick this fix to 1.6.x? Since Erlang 17 is already in Gentoo, Debian,
>> OSX and CouchDB 1.7 will be released only in June or July (hope no
>> more 1986-like issues will happens for us) - so I think this is actual
>> question for now.
>
> Hmm. How invasive has this been?
Well..as usual it could be with the shell bits (:
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> here is the status update: etap tests 231 and 200 were fixed on 1.6.x.
>> The only issue left for replicator tests against R14B01.
>> As for R14B01 issue I can provide the fix right now, but it's not
>> very...correct. So the question is pretty simple: when you plan and
>> will have a time to cut 1.6.0-rc4? If this will happens tomorrow so I
>> have no reasons to hold the release. If I have day or two, I'd like to
>> continue investigations to make fix more correct.
>
> Thanks for the update. I think we can hold it a little bit longer. How
> about we say I spin an rc.4 by Monday morning my time, and if you have
> no news on this by then we consider just living with it?
Deal. Monday is good. Thanks!
>> Also, seems we have Erlang 17 support in master now...not single shot
>> was made, but looks like it build now correct. I wonder if it worth to
>> pick this fix to 1.6.x? Since Erlang 17 is already in Gentoo, Debian,
>> OSX and CouchDB 1.7 will be released only in June or July (hope no
>> more 1986-like issues will happens for us) - so I think this is actual
>> question for now.
>
> Hmm. How invasive has this been?
Well..as usual it could be with the shell bits (:
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> here is the status update: etap tests 231 and 200 were fixed on 1.6.x.
> The only issue left for replicator tests against R14B01.
> As for R14B01 issue I can provide the fix right now, but it's not
> very...correct. So the question is pretty simple: when you plan and
> will have a time to cut 1.6.0-rc4? If this will happens tomorrow so I
> have no reasons to hold the release. If I have day or two, I'd like to
> continue investigations to make fix more correct.
Thanks for the update. I think we can hold it a little bit longer. How
about we say I spin an rc.4 by Monday morning my time, and if you have
no news on this by then we consider just living with it?
> Also, seems we have Erlang 17 support in master now...not single shot
> was made, but looks like it build now correct. I wonder if it worth to
> pick this fix to 1.6.x? Since Erlang 17 is already in Gentoo, Debian,
> OSX and CouchDB 1.7 will be released only in June or July (hope no
> more 1986-like issues will happens for us) - so I think this is actual
> question for now.
Hmm. How invasive has this been?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
>> reading between the lines, are we aborting rc.3 as a result of these
>> last 2 issues?
>
> Yes! Sorry for not being more explicit about it, but all of the test
> failures seen soon after starting the vote on this made me feel iffy
> about it. It looks like Alexander is currently making solid progress
> on fixing those (though help from others is always welcome!), so I
> hope I'll have an rc.4 soonish.
Hi Dirkjan,
here is the status update: etap tests 231 and 200 were fixed on 1.6.x.
The only issue left for replicator tests against R14B01.
As for R14B01 issue I can provide the fix right now, but it's not
very...correct. So the question is pretty simple: when you plan and
will have a time to cut 1.6.0-rc4? If this will happens tomorrow so I
have no reasons to hold the release. If I have day or two, I'd like to
continue investigations to make fix more correct.
Also, seems we have Erlang 17 support in master now...not single shot
was made, but looks like it build now correct. I wonder if it worth to
pick this fix to 1.6.x? Since Erlang 17 is already in Gentoo, Debian,
OSX and CouchDB 1.7 will be released only in June or July (hope no
more 1986-like issues will happens for us) - so I think this is actual
question for now.
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Robert Kowalski <ro...@kowalski.gd>.
Hi,
we just received a patch regarding a XSS issue in Fauxton which just landed
in master.
I also cherry-picked it to the 1.6.x branch.
Big thank you to Alexander Shorin for guidance & help!
Best,
Robert
2014-05-01 22:22 GMT+02:00 Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>
> wrote:
> > reading between the lines, are we aborting rc.3 as a result of these
> > last 2 issues?
>
> Yes! Sorry for not being more explicit about it, but all of the test
> failures seen soon after starting the vote on this made me feel iffy
> about it. It looks like Alexander is currently making solid progress
> on fixing those (though help from others is always welcome!), so I
> hope I'll have an rc.4 soonish.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> reading between the lines, are we aborting rc.3 as a result of these
> last 2 issues?
Yes! Sorry for not being more explicit about it, but all of the test
failures seen soon after starting the vote on this made me feel iffy
about it. It looks like Alexander is currently making solid progress
on fixing those (though help from others is always welcome!), so I
hope I'll have an rc.4 soonish.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org>.
The way I read it, with IRC logs to back it up, is that there are changes checked in that fix these tests, yes.
As such I think we need to cancel rc.3. I need to understand if Alexander is saying "confirmed *fixed* for R14B01" or not - if fixed, we can probably move swiftly to an rc.4.
-Joan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Cottlehuber" <dc...@jsonified.com>
To: "CouchDB Developers" <de...@couchdb.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 4:40:56 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Hey Dirkjan, all,
reading between the lines, are we aborting rc.3 as a result of these
last 2 issues?
On 30 April 2014 14:17, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>> well, bummer. Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get:
>>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t .......... Failed 4/16 subtests
>>>
>>> Test Summary Report
>>> -------------------
>>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
>>> Failed tests: 9, 12-13, 15
>>> Files=7, Tests=1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr 0.09 sys + 155.32 cusr 13.16 csys = 169.38 CPU)
>>> Result: FAIL
>>> make[3]: *** [check] Error 1
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I’m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for the rest of the week. I’ll see if I can maybe look closer at what’s going on locally while on the flight.
>>
>> I'm failed to reproduce this with R14B04, but will try to R14B01 as you have.
>
> Confirmed for R14B01.
>
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
Hey Dirkjan, all,
reading between the lines, are we aborting rc.3 as a result of these
last 2 issues?
On 30 April 2014 14:17, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>> well, bummer. Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get:
>>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t .......... Failed 4/16 subtests
>>>
>>> Test Summary Report
>>> -------------------
>>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
>>> Failed tests: 9, 12-13, 15
>>> Files=7, Tests=1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr 0.09 sys + 155.32 cusr 13.16 csys = 169.38 CPU)
>>> Result: FAIL
>>> make[3]: *** [check] Error 1
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I’m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for the rest of the week. I’ll see if I can maybe look closer at what’s going on locally while on the flight.
>>
>> I'm failed to reproduce this with R14B04, but will try to R14B01 as you have.
>
> Confirmed for R14B01.
>
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>> well, bummer. Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get:
>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t .......... Failed 4/16 subtests
>>
>> Test Summary Report
>> -------------------
>> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
>> Failed tests: 9, 12-13, 15
>> Files=7, Tests=1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr 0.09 sys + 155.32 cusr 13.16 csys = 169.38 CPU)
>> Result: FAIL
>> make[3]: *** [check] Error 1
>>
>> Unfortunately, I’m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for the rest of the week. I’ll see if I can maybe look closer at what’s going on locally while on the flight.
>
> I'm failed to reproduce this with R14B04, but will try to R14B01 as you have.
Confirmed for R14B01.
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
Thanks Alex,
You are doing an amazing job of nailing these sneaky bugs. Respect!
A+
Dave
------------------------------------------------------
From: Alexander Shorin kxepal@gmail.com
Reply: dev@couchdb.apache.org dev@couchdb.apache.org
Date: 29. April 2014 at 15:56:45
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org dev@couchdb.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mutton, James wrote:
> > well, bummer. Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get:
> > /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t
> .......... Failed 4/16 subtests
> >
> > Test Summary Report
> > -------------------
> > /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t
> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
> > Failed tests: 9, 12-13, 15
> > Files=7, Tests=1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr 0.09 sys + 155.32 cusr 13.16 csys
> = 169.38 CPU)
> > Result: FAIL
> > make[3]: *** [check] Error 1
> >
> > Unfortunately, I’m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for the rest of
> the week. I’ll see if I can maybe look closer at what’s going on locally while on the flight.
>
> I'm failed to reproduce this with R14B04, but will try to R14B01 as you have.
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>
--
Dave Cottlehuber
Sent from my Couch
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
> well, bummer. Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get:
> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t .......... Failed 4/16 subtests
>
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
> Failed tests: 9, 12-13, 15
> Files=7, Tests=1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr 0.09 sys + 155.32 cusr 13.16 csys = 169.38 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> make[3]: *** [check] Error 1
>
> Unfortunately, I’m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for the rest of the week. I’ll see if I can maybe look closer at what’s going on locally while on the flight.
I'm failed to reproduce this with R14B04, but will try to R14B01 as you have.
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by "Mutton, James" <jm...@akamai.com>.
well, bummer. Tried 3 times on R14B01, all 3 I get:
/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t .......... Failed 4/16 subtests
Test Summary Report
-------------------
/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
Failed tests: 9, 12-13, 15
Files=7, Tests=1832, 150 wallclock secs ( 0.81 usr 0.09 sys + 155.32 cusr 13.16 csys = 169.38 CPU)
Result: FAIL
make[3]: *** [check] Error 1
Unfortunately, I’m needing some sleep then leaving on some vacation for the rest of the week. I’ll see if I can maybe look closer at what’s going on locally while on the flight.
</JamesM>
On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:28, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
> It did but others appeared which leads me to suspect my local install of erlang, given what it takes to get R14 to build with clang.
>
> Failed 4/16 subtests
> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
> Failed tests: 9, 11, 13, 15
> Result: FAIL
>
> deleted everything and rerunning, lets see if the same tests fail.
>
> </JamesM>
>
> On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:17, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> R14B04 should be fine (B02 is certainly not, though) and does have some important (but rare) bugfixes over B01. The strong recommendation for R14B01 comes from Cloudant. We run R14B01 and have for years, we trust it to work (and we trust it to fail in various known ways). I’m curious to know if the test issue vanishes on B01, though.
>>
>> B.
>>
>> On 23 Apr 2014, at 08:47, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I’m going back now and running against R14B01 (the usual recommendation) instead of R14B04. Could be something odd between 01 and 04 and also this error was on OSX 10.9 not linux, so I’d stop short of saying that all of R14 is borked.
>>>
>>> </JamesM>
>>>
>>> On Apr 23, 2014, at 0:35, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> What do we make of these?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
>>>>>
>>>>> 21/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js ... FAIL
>>>>> 26/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js … FAIL
>>>>>
>>>>> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other times they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
>>>>
>>>> I think the fact that that you "get dist check passing" even though
>>>> some tests fail is pretty worrying. But apparently either no one is
>>>> reproducing these failures or no one is seeing them (since distcheck
>>>> passes anyway)?
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>>>> R14B04
>>>>> Sigs: OK
>>>>> Hashes: OK
>>>>> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
>>>>> Failed test: 27
>>>>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
>>>>> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
>>>>> Result: FAIL
>>>>> Install/Run: OK
>>>>> Verify: OK
>>>>
>>>> So this works on R15, R16, but not R14? Isn't this what we fixed since rc.2?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Dirkjan
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
On 23 April 2014 10:28, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
> It did but others appeared which leads me to suspect my local install of erlang, given what it takes to get R14 to build with clang.
I've not succeeded in getting a properly working R14B04 on OSX
Mavericks (this was OSX, right ?).
> Failed 4/16 subtests
> /tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
> Failed tests: 9, 11, 13, 15
> Result: FAIL
>
> deleted everything and rerunning, lets see if the same tests fail.
>
> </JamesM>
Hey James,
Not sure if you know, but you can re-run the tests with a `-v` and see
the output during it, at least what etap shows us:
./test/etap/run -v ./test/etap/250-upgrade-legacy-view-files.t
for example.
A+
Dave
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by "Mutton, James" <jm...@akamai.com>.
It did but others appeared which leads me to suspect my local install of erlang, given what it takes to get R14 to build with clang.
Failed 4/16 subtests
/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../src/couch_replicator/test/07-use-checkpoints.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4)
Failed tests: 9, 11, 13, 15
Result: FAIL
deleted everything and rerunning, lets see if the same tests fail.
</JamesM>
On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:17, Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
> R14B04 should be fine (B02 is certainly not, though) and does have some important (but rare) bugfixes over B01. The strong recommendation for R14B01 comes from Cloudant. We run R14B01 and have for years, we trust it to work (and we trust it to fail in various known ways). I’m curious to know if the test issue vanishes on B01, though.
>
> B.
>
> On 23 Apr 2014, at 08:47, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>
>> I’m going back now and running against R14B01 (the usual recommendation) instead of R14B04. Could be something odd between 01 and 04 and also this error was on OSX 10.9 not linux, so I’d stop short of saying that all of R14 is borked.
>>
>> </JamesM>
>>
>> On Apr 23, 2014, at 0:35, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> What do we make of these?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
>>>>
>>>> 21/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js ... FAIL
>>>> 26/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js … FAIL
>>>>
>>>> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other times they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
>>>
>>> I think the fact that that you "get dist check passing" even though
>>> some tests fail is pretty worrying. But apparently either no one is
>>> reproducing these failures or no one is seeing them (since distcheck
>>> passes anyway)?
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>>> R14B04
>>>> Sigs: OK
>>>> Hashes: OK
>>>> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
>>>> Failed test: 27
>>>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
>>>> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
>>>> Result: FAIL
>>>> Install/Run: OK
>>>> Verify: OK
>>>
>>> So this works on R15, R16, but not R14? Isn't this what we fixed since rc.2?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dirkjan
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Robert Samuel Newson <rn...@apache.org>.
R14B04 should be fine (B02 is certainly not, though) and does have some important (but rare) bugfixes over B01. The strong recommendation for R14B01 comes from Cloudant. We run R14B01 and have for years, we trust it to work (and we trust it to fail in various known ways). I’m curious to know if the test issue vanishes on B01, though.
B.
On 23 Apr 2014, at 08:47, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
> I’m going back now and running against R14B01 (the usual recommendation) instead of R14B04. Could be something odd between 01 and 04 and also this error was on OSX 10.9 not linux, so I’d stop short of saying that all of R14 is borked.
>
> </JamesM>
>
> On Apr 23, 2014, at 0:35, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> What do we make of these?
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
>>>
>>> 21/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js ... FAIL
>>> 26/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js … FAIL
>>>
>>> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other times they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
>>
>> I think the fact that that you "get dist check passing" even though
>> some tests fail is pretty worrying. But apparently either no one is
>> reproducing these failures or no one is seeing them (since distcheck
>> passes anyway)?
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>>> R14B04
>>> Sigs: OK
>>> Hashes: OK
>>> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
>>> Failed test: 27
>>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
>>> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
>>> Result: FAIL
>>> Install/Run: OK
>>> Verify: OK
>>
>> So this works on R15, R16, but not R14? Isn't this what we fixed since rc.2?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dirkjan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by "Mutton, James" <jm...@akamai.com>.
I’m going back now and running against R14B01 (the usual recommendation) instead of R14B04. Could be something odd between 01 and 04 and also this error was on OSX 10.9 not linux, so I’d stop short of saying that all of R14 is borked.
</JamesM>
On Apr 23, 2014, at 0:35, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> What do we make of these?
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
>>
>> 21/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js ... FAIL
>> 26/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js … FAIL
>>
>> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other times they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
>
> I think the fact that that you "get dist check passing" even though
> some tests fail is pretty worrying. But apparently either no one is
> reproducing these failures or no one is seeing them (since distcheck
> passes anyway)?
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
>> R14B04
>> Sigs: OK
>> Hashes: OK
>> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
>> Failed test: 27
>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
>> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
>> Result: FAIL
>> Install/Run: OK
>> Verify: OK
>
> So this works on R15, R16, but not R14? Isn't this what we fixed since rc.2?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
Hi folks,
What do we make of these?
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
>
> 21/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js ... FAIL
> 26/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js … FAIL
>
> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other times they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
I think the fact that that you "get dist check passing" even though
some tests fail is pretty worrying. But apparently either no one is
reproducing these failures or no one is seeing them (since distcheck
passes anyway)?
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
> R14B04
> Sigs: OK
> Hashes: OK
> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
> Failed test: 27
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> Install/Run: OK
> Verify: OK
So this works on R15, R16, but not R14? Isn't this what we fixed since rc.2?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de>.
thx Alex :)
On 20 April 2014 21:22, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
> > iirc there was a discussion about which Erlang versions we should
> support.
> > Is anyone aware of that? So the direct question is: to which Erlang
> version
> > back do we have to take care for building CouchDB?
>
> >=R14 and <R17 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2200)
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>
--
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!
http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
> iirc there was a discussion about which Erlang versions we should support.
> Is anyone aware of that? So the direct question is: to which Erlang version
> back do we have to take care for building CouchDB?
>=R14 and <R17 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2200)
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de>.
iirc there was a discussion about which Erlang versions we should support.
Is anyone aware of that? So the direct question is: to which Erlang version
back do we have to take care for building CouchDB?
On 19 April 2014 00:03, Mutton, James <jm...@akamai.com> wrote:
> Mac OS X 10.9.2
>
> R16B03-1, R15B03-1
> Sigs: OK
> Hashes: OK
> Tests: OK
> Install/Run: OK
> Verify: OK
>
>
> R14B04
> Sigs: OK
> Hashes: OK
> ../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27
> Failed: 1)
> Failed test: 27
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
> Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07
> cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> Install/Run: OK
> Verify: OK
>
> </JamesM>
>
> On Apr 18, 2014, at 8:08, Nick North <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Windows 8.1, Erlang R14B04 and R16B02:
> >
> > Sigs OK
> > Hashes OK
> > Verify install OK
> > All JS tests OK
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> > On 18 April 2014 12:01, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Here are my test results for Mac OS X 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03-1
> >>
> >> sigs,hashes -> OK
> >> make distcheck -> OK
> >> make install -> OK
> >> run CouchDB -> OK
> >> verify install -> OK
> >>
> >> I'd say GO GO GO ! :)
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 18 April 2014 11:20, Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
> >>>
> >>> 21/87
> >>>
> >>
> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js
> >>> ... FAIL
> >>> 26/87
> >>>
> >>
> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js
> >>> … FAIL
> >>>
> >>> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run
> >>> ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other
> >> times
> >>> they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Garren
> >>>
> >>> On 18 Apr 2014, at 10:38 AM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Gentoo Linux Erlang R16B03-1
> >>>> FreeBSD 9 Erlang R15B02
> >>>> FreeBSD 10 Eralng R16B02
> >>>> ALL Spidermonkey 1.8.5
> >>>>
> >>>> Sigs ok, hashes ok, tests ok, +1 SHIP IT \o/
> >>>>
> >>>> (:
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> ,,,^..^,,,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> Dear community,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Changes since last round:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *
> >>>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.6.x
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> >>>>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
> >>>>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get
> >>>>> stuck in!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> wget
> >>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz
> >>>>> wget
> >>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.asc
> >>>>> wget
> >>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.ish
> >>>>> wget
> >>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.md5
> >>>>> wget
> >>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.sha
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please follow the test procedure here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please remember that "rc.3" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
> >>>>> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.6.0.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please cast your votes now.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dirkjan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andy Wenk
> >> Hamburg - Germany
> >> RockIt!
> >>
> >> http://www.couchdb-buch.de
> >> http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
> >>
> >> GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
> >>
> >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
> >>
>
>
--
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!
http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by "Mutton, James" <jm...@akamai.com>.
Mac OS X 10.9.2
R16B03-1, R15B03-1
Sigs: OK
Hashes: OK
Tests: OK
Install/Run: OK
Verify: OK
R14B04
Sigs: OK
Hashes: OK
../test/etap/231-cors.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 27 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 27
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 26 tests but ran 27.
Files=51, Tests=1213, 309 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr 0.11 sys + 139.07 cusr 19.59 csys = 159.23 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Install/Run: OK
Verify: OK
</JamesM>
On Apr 18, 2014, at 8:08, Nick North <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Windows 8.1, Erlang R14B04 and R16B02:
>
> Sigs OK
> Hashes OK
> Verify install OK
> All JS tests OK
>
> +1
>
> Nick
>
>
> On 18 April 2014 12:01, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
>
>> Here are my test results for Mac OS X 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03-1
>>
>> sigs,hashes -> OK
>> make distcheck -> OK
>> make install -> OK
>> run CouchDB -> OK
>> verify install -> OK
>>
>> I'd say GO GO GO ! :)
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18 April 2014 11:20, Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
>>>
>>> 21/87
>>>
>> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js
>>> ... FAIL
>>> 26/87
>>>
>> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js
>>> … FAIL
>>>
>>> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run
>>> ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other
>> times
>>> they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Garren
>>>
>>> On 18 Apr 2014, at 10:38 AM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gentoo Linux Erlang R16B03-1
>>>> FreeBSD 9 Erlang R15B02
>>>> FreeBSD 10 Eralng R16B02
>>>> ALL Spidermonkey 1.8.5
>>>>
>>>> Sigs ok, hashes ok, tests ok, +1 SHIP IT \o/
>>>>
>>>> (:
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ,,,^..^,,,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Dear community,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since last round:
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.6.x
>>>>>
>>>>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>>>>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
>>>>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get
>>>>> stuck in!
>>>>>
>>>>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
>>>>>
>>>>> wget
>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz
>>>>> wget
>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.asc
>>>>> wget
>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.ish
>>>>> wget
>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.md5
>>>>> wget
>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.sha
>>>>>
>>>>> Please follow the test procedure here:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>>>>>
>>>>> Please remember that "rc.3" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
>>>>> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.6.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please cast your votes now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dirkjan
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andy Wenk
>> Hamburg - Germany
>> RockIt!
>>
>> http://www.couchdb-buch.de
>> http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
>>
>> GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
>>
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Nick North <no...@gmail.com>.
Windows 8.1, Erlang R14B04 and R16B02:
Sigs OK
Hashes OK
Verify install OK
All JS tests OK
+1
Nick
On 18 April 2014 12:01, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
> Here are my test results for Mac OS X 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03-1
>
> sigs,hashes -> OK
> make distcheck -> OK
> make install -> OK
> run CouchDB -> OK
> verify install -> OK
>
> I'd say GO GO GO ! :)
>
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
> On 18 April 2014 11:20, Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
> >
> > 21/87
> >
> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js
> > ... FAIL
> > 26/87
> >
> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js
> > … FAIL
> >
> > If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run
> > ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other
> times
> > they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
> >
> > Cheers
> > Garren
> >
> > On 18 Apr 2014, at 10:38 AM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Gentoo Linux Erlang R16B03-1
> > > FreeBSD 9 Erlang R15B02
> > > FreeBSD 10 Eralng R16B02
> > > ALL Spidermonkey 1.8.5
> > >
> > > Sigs ok, hashes ok, tests ok, +1 SHIP IT \o/
> > >
> > > (:
> > >
> > > --
> > > ,,,^..^,,,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>
> > wrote:
> > >> Dear community,
> > >>
> > >> I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3.
> > >>
> > >> Changes since last round:
> > >>
> > >> *
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.6.x
> > >>
> > >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> > >> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
> > >> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get
> > >> stuck in!
> > >>
> > >> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
> > >>
> > >> wget
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz
> > >> wget
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.asc
> > >> wget
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.ish
> > >> wget
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.md5
> > >> wget
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.sha
> > >>
> > >> Please follow the test procedure here:
> > >>
> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
> > >>
> > >> Please remember that "rc.3" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
> > >> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.6.0.
> > >>
> > >> Please cast your votes now.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Dirkjan
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andy Wenk
> Hamburg - Germany
> RockIt!
>
> http://www.couchdb-buch.de
> http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
>
> GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
>
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de>.
Here are my test results for Mac OS X 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03-1
sigs,hashes -> OK
make distcheck -> OK
make install -> OK
run CouchDB -> OK
verify install -> OK
I'd say GO GO GO ! :)
+1
On 18 April 2014 11:20, Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
>
> 21/87
> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js
> ... FAIL
> 26/87
> /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js
> … FAIL
>
> If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run
> ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other times
> they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
>
> Cheers
> Garren
>
> On 18 Apr 2014, at 10:38 AM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Gentoo Linux Erlang R16B03-1
> > FreeBSD 9 Erlang R15B02
> > FreeBSD 10 Eralng R16B02
> > ALL Spidermonkey 1.8.5
> >
> > Sigs ok, hashes ok, tests ok, +1 SHIP IT \o/
> >
> > (:
> >
> > --
> > ,,,^..^,,,
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>
> wrote:
> >> Dear community,
> >>
> >> I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3.
> >>
> >> Changes since last round:
> >>
> >> *
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.6.x
> >>
> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> >> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
> >> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get
> >> stuck in!
> >>
> >> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
> >>
> >> wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz
> >> wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.asc
> >> wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.ish
> >> wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.md5
> >> wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.sha
> >>
> >> Please follow the test procedure here:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
> >>
> >> Please remember that "rc.3" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
> >> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.6.0.
> >>
> >> Please cast your votes now.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Dirkjan
>
>
--
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!
http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Garren Smith <ga...@apache.org>.
I get dist check passing. But when I run it, these two tests fail
21/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/design_docs.js ... FAIL
26/87 /tmp/couchdb/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/apache-couchdb-1.6.0/_build/../share/www/script/test/etags_views.js … FAIL
If I run them individually (make dev then ./test/javascript/run ./share/www/script/test/etags_views.js) sometimes they pass and other times they fail. I’m on Mac OSx 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03
Cheers
Garren
On 18 Apr 2014, at 10:38 AM, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gentoo Linux Erlang R16B03-1
> FreeBSD 9 Erlang R15B02
> FreeBSD 10 Eralng R16B02
> ALL Spidermonkey 1.8.5
>
> Sigs ok, hashes ok, tests ok, +1 SHIP IT \o/
>
> (:
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>> Dear community,
>>
>> I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3.
>>
>> Changes since last round:
>>
>> * https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.6.x
>>
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get
>> stuck in!
>>
>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
>>
>> wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz
>> wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.asc
>> wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.ish
>> wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.md5
>> wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.sha
>>
>> Please follow the test procedure here:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>>
>> Please remember that "rc.3" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
>> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.6.0.
>>
>> Please cast your votes now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
Gentoo Linux Erlang R16B03-1
FreeBSD 9 Erlang R15B02
FreeBSD 10 Eralng R16B02
ALL Spidermonkey 1.8.5
Sigs ok, hashes ok, tests ok, +1 SHIP IT \o/
(:
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I would like to release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3.
>
> Changes since last round:
>
> * https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.6.x
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get
> stuck in!
>
> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
>
> wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz
> wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.asc
> wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.ish
> wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.md5
> wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.3/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.sha
>
> Please follow the test procedure here:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>
> Please remember that "rc.3" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.6.0.
>
> Please cast your votes now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dirkjan