You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@calcite.apache.org by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> on 2023/11/01 02:16:43 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Mihai,
I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in 1.36.0
Itiel,
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and even
with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it merged
in 1.36.0
Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
>
> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> But we can leave it for later.
>
> Mihai
>
> ________________________________
> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>
> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and CALCITE-4455,
> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
>
> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll start
> the release process after they are merged.
>
> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> >
> > I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> >
> > > On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The expected release time at the end of the month seems to be coming soon.
> > > I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> > >
> > > #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days (almost ready):
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >
> > > #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >
> > > #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Ran Tao
> > >
> > >
> > > Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六 13:34写道：
> > >
> > >> Hi, all:
> > >> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues has been someone
> > >> reviewed.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> > >> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> > >> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> > >> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they should be
> > >> resolved soon.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>
> > >> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>
> > >> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >>
> > >> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at the PR.
> > >>>
> > >>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > >>>>
> > >>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should collectively
> > >>> fix them.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but does not include
> > >>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well for the tests
> > >> to
> > >>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but should be
> > >> amended
> > >>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Mihai
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ________________________________
> > >>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > >>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >>>>
> > >>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted 1.36.0
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of October is
> > >>> approaching.
> > >>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues in #1.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to be merged
> > >>> shortly
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> > >>>>
> > >>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> > >>>>
> > >>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>
> > >>>> #4. blocker issues status
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is marked blocked
> > >>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921 now.
> > >>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more thorough solution.
> > >>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi, community.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that calcite's MAP
> > >>> SubQuery
> > >>>>> doesn't work,
> > >>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe we can fix it
> > >> in
> > >>>>> 1.36.
> > >>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review it. many
> > >>> thanks.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>> Ran Tao
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last release [1] and
> > >>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and Github [3], there
> > >>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of the release.
> > >>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean up our 1.36
> > >>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd propose to
> > >>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will give us
> > >> about
> > >>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What do you
> > >> think?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would be:
> > >>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> > >>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > >>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good shape and
> > >> want
> > >>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to 1.36.0,
> > >> this
> > >>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best to get it
> > >> in.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's introduced by
> > >>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check whether it is a
> > >>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> > >>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > >>>>>> [4]
> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > >>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Benchao Li
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> Benchao Li
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>.
I've opened a PR[1] to add some improvements to the releasing document.
[1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3517
Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月11日周六 20:39写道：
>
> Thanks Francis for taking care of this, and all the help during the release!
>
> Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月11日周六 16:32写道：
> >
> > I committed CALCITE-6103 in https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3516
> > and built the javadocs in
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/actions/runs/6833129020/job/18584563071
> >
> > On 10/11/2023 10:06 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> > > Thanks Francis, I'll proceed with next steps now.
> > >
> > > Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 19:01写道：
> > >>
> > >> I think something has changed in the openjdk image used to build the
> > >> javadocs.
> > >>
> > >> See:
> > >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73516116/got-error-xargs-is-not-available-when-trying-to-run-a-docker-image/75660631#75660631
> > >>
> > >> I think we need to move to the eclipse-temurin images as the openjdk
> > >> images have been EOL for a while.
> > >>
> > >> I think just leave the javadoc publishing for now, as I'll open a PR
> > >> after the release to fix this.
> > >>
> > >> Francis
> > >>
> > >> On 10/11/2023 9:50 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> > >>> Thanks Francis for your response.
> > >>>
> > >>> There is one more problem, that the CI for releasing javadoc[1] is
> > >>> failing with "xargs is not available".
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/actions/runs/6822762022/job/18555648165
> > >>>
> > >>> Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 18:18写道：
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I do see 1.36.0 on ASF Nexus (https://repository.apache.org/) I wonder
> > >>>> if it's just replication lag.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 10/11/2023 9:07 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> > >>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I met some problems while publishing.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The command I'm using is `./gradlew publishDist -Prc=0 -Pasf
> > >>>>> -Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITHUB`. Although the command ran
> > >>>>> successfully, I noticed the 'releaseRepository' prints somethings
> > >>>>> wield, and actually there is no 1.36.0 in nexus yet[1]. , Below is all
> > >>>>> the output from it:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Starting a Gradle Daemon (subsequent builds will be faster)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Configure project :
> > >>>>> Building Apache Calcite 1.36.0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Task :publishSvnDist
> > >>>>> Listing SVN folders [dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0] at
> > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
> > >>>>> Executing svnmucc. root=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist,
> > >>>>> message=Promoting Apache Calcite calcite-1.36.0-rc0 -> calcite-1.36.0
> > >>>>> to release area, commands:
> > >>>>> mkdir
> > >>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0
> > >>>>> cp
> > >>>>> 65079
> > >>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> > >>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> > >>>>> cp
> > >>>>> 65079
> > >>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> > >>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> > >>>>> cp
> > >>>>> 65079
> > >>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> > >>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> > >>>>> rm
> > >>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0
> > >>>>> r65191 committed by libenchao at 2023-11-10T08:56:00.445211Z
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Task :releaseRepository
> > >>>>> Initialized stagingRepositoryId orgapachecalcite-1219 for repository nexus
> > >>>>> GET request failed. 404: Not Found, body: [errors:[[id:*, msg:No such
> > >>>>> repository: orgapachecalcite-1219]]]
> > >>>>> Requested operation was executed successfully in attempt 83 (maximum
> > >>>>> allowed 601)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Task :createReleaseTag
> > >>>>> Created tag calcite-1.36.0 ->
> > >>>>> Ref[refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0=450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c(-1)]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Task :pushReleaseTag
> > >>>>> Pushing tag to Git remote release-origin: https://github.com/apache/calcite.git
> > >>>>> Message from release-origin:
> > >>>>> refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0: OK,
> > >>>>> 450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c (fastForward)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it
> > >>>>> incompatible with Gradle 8.0.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation
> > >>>>> warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> See https://docs.gradle.org/7.6.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 5m 4s
> > >>>>> 34 actionable tasks: 4 executed, 30 up-to-date
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.calcite/calcite-core
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 11:18写道：
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Looks great, Tanner!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's
> > >>>>>>> remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Ok I believe I reset main to
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> > >>>>>>>> .
> > >>>>>>>> Feel free to take a look at
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
> > >>>>>>>> and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
> > >>>>>>>> thanks for your patience.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>> Tanner
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
> > >>>>>>>>> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Tanner
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Tanner,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
> > >>>>>>>>>> commit(
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> > >>>>>>>>>> ),
> > >>>>>>>>>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
> > >>>>>>>>>> ,
> > >>>>>>>>>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
> > >>>>>>>>>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> > >>>>>>>>>> will be invalid.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
> > >>>>>>>>>> handling
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the release!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Tanner
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Tanner
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
> > >>>>>>>>>> francischuang@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
> > >>>>>>>>>> voting
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for 1.36.0.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be
> > >>>>>>> reverted
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Francis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Benchao
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
> > >>>>>>>>>> start the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
> > >>>>>>>>>> until
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further notice.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
> > >>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left one
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
> > >>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
> > >>>>>>>>>> reviewed and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
> > >>>>>>>>>> think?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
> > >>>>>>>>>> I'll
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
> > >>>>>>>>>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be coming
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (almost
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13:34写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
> > >>>>>>>>>> they
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libenchao@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the PR.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
> > >>>>>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collectively
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> October is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in #1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
> > >>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thorough
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calcite's MAP
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
> > >>>>>>>>>> review
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. many
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
> > >>>>>>>>>> 11:02写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Github [3],
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
> > >>>>>>>>>> clean
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up our
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
> > >>>>>>>>>> I'd
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
> > >>>>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give us
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shape and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
> > >>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
> > >>>>>>>>>> best
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> Benchao Li
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>.
Thanks Francis for taking care of this, and all the help during the release!
Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月11日周六 16:32写道：
>
> I committed CALCITE-6103 in https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3516
> and built the javadocs in
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/actions/runs/6833129020/job/18584563071
>
> On 10/11/2023 10:06 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> > Thanks Francis, I'll proceed with next steps now.
> >
> > Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 19:01写道：
> >>
> >> I think something has changed in the openjdk image used to build the
> >> javadocs.
> >>
> >> See:
> >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73516116/got-error-xargs-is-not-available-when-trying-to-run-a-docker-image/75660631#75660631
> >>
> >> I think we need to move to the eclipse-temurin images as the openjdk
> >> images have been EOL for a while.
> >>
> >> I think just leave the javadoc publishing for now, as I'll open a PR
> >> after the release to fix this.
> >>
> >> Francis
> >>
> >> On 10/11/2023 9:50 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> >>> Thanks Francis for your response.
> >>>
> >>> There is one more problem, that the CI for releasing javadoc[1] is
> >>> failing with "xargs is not available".
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/actions/runs/6822762022/job/18555648165
> >>>
> >>> Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 18:18写道：
> >>>>
> >>>> I do see 1.36.0 on ASF Nexus (https://repository.apache.org/) I wonder
> >>>> if it's just replication lag.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/11/2023 9:07 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I met some problems while publishing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The command I'm using is `./gradlew publishDist -Prc=0 -Pasf
> >>>>> -Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITHUB`. Although the command ran
> >>>>> successfully, I noticed the 'releaseRepository' prints somethings
> >>>>> wield, and actually there is no 1.36.0 in nexus yet[1]. , Below is all
> >>>>> the output from it:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Starting a Gradle Daemon (subsequent builds will be faster)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Configure project :
> >>>>> Building Apache Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Task :publishSvnDist
> >>>>> Listing SVN folders [dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0] at
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
> >>>>> Executing svnmucc. root=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist,
> >>>>> message=Promoting Apache Calcite calcite-1.36.0-rc0 -> calcite-1.36.0
> >>>>> to release area, commands:
> >>>>> mkdir
> >>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0
> >>>>> cp
> >>>>> 65079
> >>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> >>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> >>>>> cp
> >>>>> 65079
> >>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> >>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> >>>>> cp
> >>>>> 65079
> >>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> >>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> >>>>> rm
> >>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0
> >>>>> r65191 committed by libenchao at 2023-11-10T08:56:00.445211Z
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Task :releaseRepository
> >>>>> Initialized stagingRepositoryId orgapachecalcite-1219 for repository nexus
> >>>>> GET request failed. 404: Not Found, body: [errors:[[id:*, msg:No such
> >>>>> repository: orgapachecalcite-1219]]]
> >>>>> Requested operation was executed successfully in attempt 83 (maximum
> >>>>> allowed 601)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Task :createReleaseTag
> >>>>> Created tag calcite-1.36.0 ->
> >>>>> Ref[refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0=450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c(-1)]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Task :pushReleaseTag
> >>>>> Pushing tag to Git remote release-origin: https://github.com/apache/calcite.git
> >>>>> Message from release-origin:
> >>>>> refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0: OK,
> >>>>> 450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c (fastForward)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it
> >>>>> incompatible with Gradle 8.0.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation
> >>>>> warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> See https://docs.gradle.org/7.6.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 5m 4s
> >>>>> 34 actionable tasks: 4 executed, 30 up-to-date
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.calcite/calcite-core
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 11:18写道：
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Looks great, Tanner!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's
> >>>>>>> remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Ok I believe I reset main to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> >>>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>> Feel free to take a look at
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
> >>>>>>>> and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
> >>>>>>>> thanks for your patience.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
> >>>>>>>>> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Tanner,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
> >>>>>>>>>> commit(
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> >>>>>>>>>> ),
> >>>>>>>>>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
> >>>>>>>>>> ,
> >>>>>>>>>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
> >>>>>>>>>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> >>>>>>>>>> will be invalid.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
> >>>>>>>>>> handling
> >>>>>>>>>>> the release!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
> >>>>>>>>>> francischuang@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
> >>>>>>>>>> voting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for 1.36.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be
> >>>>>>> reverted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Francis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Benchao
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
> >>>>>>>>>> start the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
> >>>>>>>>>> until
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further notice.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the
> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
> >>>>>>>>>> reviewed and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
> >>>>>>>>>> think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
> >>>>>>>>>> I'll
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
> >>>>>>>>>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be coming
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (almost
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13:34写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
> >>>>>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libenchao@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the PR.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
> >>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collectively
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> October is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in #1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thorough
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calcite's MAP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
> >>>>>>>>>> review
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
> >>>>>>>>>> 11:02写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Github [3],
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
> >>>>>>>>>> clean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up our
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
> >>>>>>>>>> I'd
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
> >>>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give us
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shape and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
> >>>>>>>>>> best
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>.
I committed CALCITE-6103 in https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3516
and built the javadocs in
https://github.com/apache/calcite/actions/runs/6833129020/job/18584563071
On 10/11/2023 10:06 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> Thanks Francis, I'll proceed with next steps now.
>
> Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 19:01写道：
>>
>> I think something has changed in the openjdk image used to build the
>> javadocs.
>>
>> See:
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73516116/got-error-xargs-is-not-available-when-trying-to-run-a-docker-image/75660631#75660631
>>
>> I think we need to move to the eclipse-temurin images as the openjdk
>> images have been EOL for a while.
>>
>> I think just leave the javadoc publishing for now, as I'll open a PR
>> after the release to fix this.
>>
>> Francis
>>
>> On 10/11/2023 9:50 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
>>> Thanks Francis for your response.
>>>
>>> There is one more problem, that the CI for releasing javadoc[1] is
>>> failing with "xargs is not available".
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/actions/runs/6822762022/job/18555648165
>>>
>>> Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 18:18写道：
>>>>
>>>> I do see 1.36.0 on ASF Nexus (https://repository.apache.org/) I wonder
>>>> if it's just replication lag.
>>>>
>>>> On 10/11/2023 9:07 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I met some problems while publishing.
>>>>>
>>>>> The command I'm using is `./gradlew publishDist -Prc=0 -Pasf
>>>>> -Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITHUB`. Although the command ran
>>>>> successfully, I noticed the 'releaseRepository' prints somethings
>>>>> wield, and actually there is no 1.36.0 in nexus yet[1]. , Below is all
>>>>> the output from it:
>>>>>
>>>>> Starting a Gradle Daemon (subsequent builds will be faster)
>>>>>
>>>>>> Configure project :
>>>>> Building Apache Calcite 1.36.0
>>>>>
>>>>>> Task :publishSvnDist
>>>>> Listing SVN folders [dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0] at
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
>>>>> Executing svnmucc. root=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist,
>>>>> message=Promoting Apache Calcite calcite-1.36.0-rc0 -> calcite-1.36.0
>>>>> to release area, commands:
>>>>> mkdir
>>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0
>>>>> cp
>>>>> 65079
>>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
>>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
>>>>> cp
>>>>> 65079
>>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
>>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
>>>>> cp
>>>>> 65079
>>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
>>>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
>>>>> rm
>>>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0
>>>>> r65191 committed by libenchao at 2023-11-10T08:56:00.445211Z
>>>>>
>>>>>> Task :releaseRepository
>>>>> Initialized stagingRepositoryId orgapachecalcite-1219 for repository nexus
>>>>> GET request failed. 404: Not Found, body: [errors:[[id:*, msg:No such
>>>>> repository: orgapachecalcite-1219]]]
>>>>> Requested operation was executed successfully in attempt 83 (maximum
>>>>> allowed 601)
>>>>>
>>>>>> Task :createReleaseTag
>>>>> Created tag calcite-1.36.0 ->
>>>>> Ref[refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0=450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c(-1)]
>>>>>
>>>>>> Task :pushReleaseTag
>>>>> Pushing tag to Git remote release-origin: https://github.com/apache/calcite.git
>>>>> Message from release-origin:
>>>>> refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0: OK,
>>>>> 450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c (fastForward)
>>>>>
>>>>> Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it
>>>>> incompatible with Gradle 8.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation
>>>>> warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins.
>>>>>
>>>>> See https://docs.gradle.org/7.6.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings
>>>>>
>>>>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 5m 4s
>>>>> 34 actionable tasks: 4 executed, 30 up-to-date
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.calcite/calcite-core
>>>>>
>>>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 11:18写道：
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks great, Tanner!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's
>>>>>>> remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ok I believe I reset main to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> Feel free to take a look at
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
>>>>>>>> and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
>>>>>>>> thanks for your patience.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
>>>>>>>>> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tanner,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
>>>>>>>>>> commit(
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>>>>>>>>>> ),
>>>>>>>>>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
>>>>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>>>>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
>>>>>>>>>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>>>>>>>>>> will be invalid.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
>>>>>>>>>> handling
>>>>>>>>>>> the release!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
>>>>>>>>>> francischuang@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
>>>>>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 1.36.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be
>>>>>>> reverted
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Francis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Benchao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
>>>>>>>>>> start the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further notice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
>>>>>>>>>> reviewed and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
>>>>>>>>>> think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
>>>>>>>>>> I'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
>>>>>>>>>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be coming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (almost
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13:34写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libenchao@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the PR.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collectively
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> October is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in #1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thorough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calcite's MAP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
>>>>>>>>>> review
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
>>>>>>>>>> 11:02写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Github [3],
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
>>>>>>>>>> clean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
>>>>>>>>>> I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shape and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
>>>>>>>>>> best
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>.
Hi all, main code freeze is over and commits can resume. Thank you all
who involved in the releasing of 1.36.0.
Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 19:06写道：
>
> Thanks Francis, I'll proceed with next steps now.
>
> Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 19:01写道：
> >
> > I think something has changed in the openjdk image used to build the
> > javadocs.
> >
> > See:
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73516116/got-error-xargs-is-not-available-when-trying-to-run-a-docker-image/75660631#75660631
> >
> > I think we need to move to the eclipse-temurin images as the openjdk
> > images have been EOL for a while.
> >
> > I think just leave the javadoc publishing for now, as I'll open a PR
> > after the release to fix this.
> >
> > Francis
> >
> > On 10/11/2023 9:50 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> > > Thanks Francis for your response.
> > >
> > > There is one more problem, that the CI for releasing javadoc[1] is
> > > failing with "xargs is not available".
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/actions/runs/6822762022/job/18555648165
> > >
> > > Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 18:18写道：
> > >>
> > >> I do see 1.36.0 on ASF Nexus (https://repository.apache.org/) I wonder
> > >> if it's just replication lag.
> > >>
> > >> On 10/11/2023 9:07 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> I met some problems while publishing.
> > >>>
> > >>> The command I'm using is `./gradlew publishDist -Prc=0 -Pasf
> > >>> -Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITHUB`. Although the command ran
> > >>> successfully, I noticed the 'releaseRepository' prints somethings
> > >>> wield, and actually there is no 1.36.0 in nexus yet[1]. , Below is all
> > >>> the output from it:
> > >>>
> > >>> Starting a Gradle Daemon (subsequent builds will be faster)
> > >>>
> > >>>> Configure project :
> > >>> Building Apache Calcite 1.36.0
> > >>>
> > >>>> Task :publishSvnDist
> > >>> Listing SVN folders [dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0] at
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
> > >>> Executing svnmucc. root=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist,
> > >>> message=Promoting Apache Calcite calcite-1.36.0-rc0 -> calcite-1.36.0
> > >>> to release area, commands:
> > >>> mkdir
> > >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0
> > >>> cp
> > >>> 65079
> > >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> > >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> > >>> cp
> > >>> 65079
> > >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> > >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> > >>> cp
> > >>> 65079
> > >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> > >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> > >>> rm
> > >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0
> > >>> r65191 committed by libenchao at 2023-11-10T08:56:00.445211Z
> > >>>
> > >>>> Task :releaseRepository
> > >>> Initialized stagingRepositoryId orgapachecalcite-1219 for repository nexus
> > >>> GET request failed. 404: Not Found, body: [errors:[[id:*, msg:No such
> > >>> repository: orgapachecalcite-1219]]]
> > >>> Requested operation was executed successfully in attempt 83 (maximum
> > >>> allowed 601)
> > >>>
> > >>>> Task :createReleaseTag
> > >>> Created tag calcite-1.36.0 ->
> > >>> Ref[refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0=450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c(-1)]
> > >>>
> > >>>> Task :pushReleaseTag
> > >>> Pushing tag to Git remote release-origin: https://github.com/apache/calcite.git
> > >>> Message from release-origin:
> > >>> refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0: OK,
> > >>> 450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c (fastForward)
> > >>>
> > >>> Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it
> > >>> incompatible with Gradle 8.0.
> > >>>
> > >>> You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation
> > >>> warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins.
> > >>>
> > >>> See https://docs.gradle.org/7.6.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings
> > >>>
> > >>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 5m 4s
> > >>> 34 actionable tasks: 4 executed, 30 up-to-date
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.calcite/calcite-core
> > >>>
> > >>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 11:18写道：
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Looks great, Tanner!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's
> > >>>>> remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote:
> > >>>>>> Ok I believe I reset main to
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> > >>>>>> .
> > >>>>>> Feel free to take a look at
> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
> > >>>>>> and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
> > >>>>>> thanks for your patience.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>> Tanner
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
> > >>>>>>> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Tanner
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Tanner,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
> > >>>>>>>> commit(
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> > >>>>>>>> ),
> > >>>>>>>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
> > >>>>>>>> ,
> > >>>>>>>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
> > >>>>>>>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> > >>>>>>>> will be invalid.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
> > >>>>>>>> handling
> > >>>>>>>>> the release!
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>> Tanner
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>> Tanner
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
> > >>>>>>>> francischuang@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
> > >>>>>>>> voting
> > >>>>>>>>>>> for 1.36.0.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be
> > >>>>> reverted
> > >>>>>>>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Francis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Benchao
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
> > >>>>>>>> start the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
> > >>>>>>>> until
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> further notice.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
> > >>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the
> > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> left one
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
> > >>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
> > >>>>>>>> reviewed and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> even
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
> > >>>>>>>> think?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
> > >>>>>>>> I'll
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
> > >>>>>>>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be coming
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (almost
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 13:34写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> has been
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
> > >>>>>>>> they
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> libenchao@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the PR.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
> > >>>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collectively
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> does not
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> should be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> October is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in #1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> marked
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> thorough
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> calcite's MAP
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> we can
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
> > >>>>>>>> review
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it. many
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
> > >>>>>>>> 11:02写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Github [3],
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
> > >>>>>>>> clean
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> up our
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
> > >>>>>>>> I'd
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
> > >>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> give us
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> do you
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> shape and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
> > >>>>>>>> best
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to get
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> whether it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> Benchao Li
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>.
Thanks Francis, I'll proceed with next steps now.
Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 19:01写道：
>
> I think something has changed in the openjdk image used to build the
> javadocs.
>
> See:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73516116/got-error-xargs-is-not-available-when-trying-to-run-a-docker-image/75660631#75660631
>
> I think we need to move to the eclipse-temurin images as the openjdk
> images have been EOL for a while.
>
> I think just leave the javadoc publishing for now, as I'll open a PR
> after the release to fix this.
>
> Francis
>
> On 10/11/2023 9:50 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> > Thanks Francis for your response.
> >
> > There is one more problem, that the CI for releasing javadoc[1] is
> > failing with "xargs is not available".
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/actions/runs/6822762022/job/18555648165
> >
> > Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 18:18写道：
> >>
> >> I do see 1.36.0 on ASF Nexus (https://repository.apache.org/) I wonder
> >> if it's just replication lag.
> >>
> >> On 10/11/2023 9:07 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I met some problems while publishing.
> >>>
> >>> The command I'm using is `./gradlew publishDist -Prc=0 -Pasf
> >>> -Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITHUB`. Although the command ran
> >>> successfully, I noticed the 'releaseRepository' prints somethings
> >>> wield, and actually there is no 1.36.0 in nexus yet[1]. , Below is all
> >>> the output from it:
> >>>
> >>> Starting a Gradle Daemon (subsequent builds will be faster)
> >>>
> >>>> Configure project :
> >>> Building Apache Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>
> >>>> Task :publishSvnDist
> >>> Listing SVN folders [dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0] at
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
> >>> Executing svnmucc. root=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist,
> >>> message=Promoting Apache Calcite calcite-1.36.0-rc0 -> calcite-1.36.0
> >>> to release area, commands:
> >>> mkdir
> >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0
> >>> cp
> >>> 65079
> >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> >>> cp
> >>> 65079
> >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> >>> cp
> >>> 65079
> >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> >>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> >>> rm
> >>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0
> >>> r65191 committed by libenchao at 2023-11-10T08:56:00.445211Z
> >>>
> >>>> Task :releaseRepository
> >>> Initialized stagingRepositoryId orgapachecalcite-1219 for repository nexus
> >>> GET request failed. 404: Not Found, body: [errors:[[id:*, msg:No such
> >>> repository: orgapachecalcite-1219]]]
> >>> Requested operation was executed successfully in attempt 83 (maximum
> >>> allowed 601)
> >>>
> >>>> Task :createReleaseTag
> >>> Created tag calcite-1.36.0 ->
> >>> Ref[refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0=450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c(-1)]
> >>>
> >>>> Task :pushReleaseTag
> >>> Pushing tag to Git remote release-origin: https://github.com/apache/calcite.git
> >>> Message from release-origin:
> >>> refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0: OK,
> >>> 450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c (fastForward)
> >>>
> >>> Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it
> >>> incompatible with Gradle 8.0.
> >>>
> >>> You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation
> >>> warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins.
> >>>
> >>> See https://docs.gradle.org/7.6.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings
> >>>
> >>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 5m 4s
> >>> 34 actionable tasks: 4 executed, 30 up-to-date
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.calcite/calcite-core
> >>>
> >>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 11:18写道：
> >>>>
> >>>> Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Looks great, Tanner!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's
> >>>>> remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote:
> >>>>>> Ok I believe I reset main to
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> >>>>>> .
> >>>>>> Feel free to take a look at
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
> >>>>>> and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
> >>>>>> thanks for your patience.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
> >>>>>>> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Tanner,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
> >>>>>>>> commit(
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> >>>>>>>> ),
> >>>>>>>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
> >>>>>>>> ,
> >>>>>>>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
> >>>>>>>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> >>>>>>>> will be invalid.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
> >>>>>>>> handling
> >>>>>>>>> the release!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
> >>>>>>>> francischuang@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
> >>>>>>>> voting
> >>>>>>>>>>> for 1.36.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be
> >>>>> reverted
> >>>>>>>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Francis
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Benchao
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
> >>>>>>>> start the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
> >>>>>>>> until
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> further notice.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the
> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> left one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
> >>>>>>>> reviewed and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> even
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
> >>>>>>>> think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
> >>>>>>>> I'll
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
> >>>>>>>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> be coming
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (almost
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 13:34写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> has been
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
> >>>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> libenchao@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the PR.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
> >>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collectively
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> does not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> should be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> October is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in #1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> marked
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> thorough
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> calcite's MAP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> we can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
> >>>>>>>> review
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it. many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
> >>>>>>>> 11:02写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Github [3],
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
> >>>>>>>> clean
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> up our
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
> >>>>>>>> I'd
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
> >>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> give us
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> do you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> be:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> shape and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
> >>>>>>>> best
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to get
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> whether it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>.
I think something has changed in the openjdk image used to build the
javadocs.
See:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73516116/got-error-xargs-is-not-available-when-trying-to-run-a-docker-image/75660631#75660631
I think we need to move to the eclipse-temurin images as the openjdk
images have been EOL for a while.
I think just leave the javadoc publishing for now, as I'll open a PR
after the release to fix this.
Francis
On 10/11/2023 9:50 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> Thanks Francis for your response.
>
> There is one more problem, that the CI for releasing javadoc[1] is
> failing with "xargs is not available".
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/actions/runs/6822762022/job/18555648165
>
> Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 18:18写道：
>>
>> I do see 1.36.0 on ASF Nexus (https://repository.apache.org/) I wonder
>> if it's just replication lag.
>>
>> On 10/11/2023 9:07 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I met some problems while publishing.
>>>
>>> The command I'm using is `./gradlew publishDist -Prc=0 -Pasf
>>> -Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITHUB`. Although the command ran
>>> successfully, I noticed the 'releaseRepository' prints somethings
>>> wield, and actually there is no 1.36.0 in nexus yet[1]. , Below is all
>>> the output from it:
>>>
>>> Starting a Gradle Daemon (subsequent builds will be faster)
>>>
>>>> Configure project :
>>> Building Apache Calcite 1.36.0
>>>
>>>> Task :publishSvnDist
>>> Listing SVN folders [dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0] at
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
>>> Executing svnmucc. root=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist,
>>> message=Promoting Apache Calcite calcite-1.36.0-rc0 -> calcite-1.36.0
>>> to release area, commands:
>>> mkdir
>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0
>>> cp
>>> 65079
>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
>>> cp
>>> 65079
>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
>>> cp
>>> 65079
>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
>>> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
>>> rm
>>> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0
>>> r65191 committed by libenchao at 2023-11-10T08:56:00.445211Z
>>>
>>>> Task :releaseRepository
>>> Initialized stagingRepositoryId orgapachecalcite-1219 for repository nexus
>>> GET request failed. 404: Not Found, body: [errors:[[id:*, msg:No such
>>> repository: orgapachecalcite-1219]]]
>>> Requested operation was executed successfully in attempt 83 (maximum
>>> allowed 601)
>>>
>>>> Task :createReleaseTag
>>> Created tag calcite-1.36.0 ->
>>> Ref[refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0=450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c(-1)]
>>>
>>>> Task :pushReleaseTag
>>> Pushing tag to Git remote release-origin: https://github.com/apache/calcite.git
>>> Message from release-origin:
>>> refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0: OK,
>>> 450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c (fastForward)
>>>
>>> Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it
>>> incompatible with Gradle 8.0.
>>>
>>> You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation
>>> warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins.
>>>
>>> See https://docs.gradle.org/7.6.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings
>>>
>>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 5m 4s
>>> 34 actionable tasks: 4 executed, 30 up-to-date
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.calcite/calcite-core
>>>
>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 11:18写道：
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Looks great, Tanner!
>>>>>
>>>>> As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's
>>>>> remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote:
>>>>>> Ok I believe I reset main to
>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> Feel free to take a look at
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
>>>>>> and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
>>>>>> thanks for your patience.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
>>>>>>> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tanner,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
>>>>>>>> commit(
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>>>>>>>> ),
>>>>>>>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
>>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
>>>>>>>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>>>>>>>> will be invalid.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
>>>>>>>> handling
>>>>>>>>> the release!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
>>>>>>>> francischuang@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
>>>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>>>>>> for 1.36.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be
>>>>> reverted
>>>>>>>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Francis
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Benchao
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
>>>>>>>> start the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further notice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> left one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
>>>>>>>> reviewed and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
>>>>>>>> think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
>>>>>>>> I'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
>>>>>>>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be coming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (almost
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13:34写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> libenchao@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the PR.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collectively
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> October is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in #1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thorough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> calcite's MAP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
>>>>>>>> review
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
>>>>>>>> 11:02写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Github [3],
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
>>>>>>>> clean
>>>>>>>>>>>>> up our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
>>>>>>>> I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>> give us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shape and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
>>>>>>>> best
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>.
Thanks Francis for your response.
There is one more problem, that the CI for releasing javadoc[1] is
failing with "xargs is not available".
[1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/actions/runs/6822762022/job/18555648165
Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org> 于2023年11月10日周五 18:18写道：
>
> I do see 1.36.0 on ASF Nexus (https://repository.apache.org/) I wonder
> if it's just replication lag.
>
> On 10/11/2023 9:07 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I met some problems while publishing.
> >
> > The command I'm using is `./gradlew publishDist -Prc=0 -Pasf
> > -Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITHUB`. Although the command ran
> > successfully, I noticed the 'releaseRepository' prints somethings
> > wield, and actually there is no 1.36.0 in nexus yet[1]. , Below is all
> > the output from it:
> >
> > Starting a Gradle Daemon (subsequent builds will be faster)
> >
> >> Configure project :
> > Building Apache Calcite 1.36.0
> >
> >> Task :publishSvnDist
> > Listing SVN folders [dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0] at
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
> > Executing svnmucc. root=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist,
> > message=Promoting Apache Calcite calcite-1.36.0-rc0 -> calcite-1.36.0
> > to release area, commands:
> > mkdir
> > release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0
> > cp
> > 65079
> > dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> > release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> > cp
> > 65079
> > dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> > release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> > cp
> > 65079
> > dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> > release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> > rm
> > dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0
> > r65191 committed by libenchao at 2023-11-10T08:56:00.445211Z
> >
> >> Task :releaseRepository
> > Initialized stagingRepositoryId orgapachecalcite-1219 for repository nexus
> > GET request failed. 404: Not Found, body: [errors:[[id:*, msg:No such
> > repository: orgapachecalcite-1219]]]
> > Requested operation was executed successfully in attempt 83 (maximum
> > allowed 601)
> >
> >> Task :createReleaseTag
> > Created tag calcite-1.36.0 ->
> > Ref[refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0=450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c(-1)]
> >
> >> Task :pushReleaseTag
> > Pushing tag to Git remote release-origin: https://github.com/apache/calcite.git
> > Message from release-origin:
> > refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0: OK,
> > 450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c (fastForward)
> >
> > Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it
> > incompatible with Gradle 8.0.
> >
> > You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation
> > warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins.
> >
> > See https://docs.gradle.org/7.6.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings
> >
> > BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 5m 4s
> > 34 actionable tasks: 4 executed, 30 up-to-date
> >
> >
> > [1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.calcite/calcite-core
> >
> > Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 11:18写道：
> >>
> >> Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Looks great, Tanner!
> >>>
> >>> As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's
> >>> remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> >>>
> >>> On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote:
> >>>> Ok I believe I reset main to
> >>>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> >>>> .
> >>>> Feel free to take a look at
> >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
> >>>> and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
> >>>> thanks for your patience.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Tanner
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
> >>>>> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Tanner,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
> >>>>>> commit(
> >>>>>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> >>>>>> ),
> >>>>>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
> >>>>>> ,
> >>>>>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
> >>>>>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> >>>>>> will be invalid.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
> >>>>>> handling
> >>>>>>> the release!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
> >>>>>> francischuang@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
> >>>>>> voting
> >>>>>>>>> for 1.36.0.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be
> >>> reverted
> >>>>>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Francis
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Benchao
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review:
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
> >>>>>> start the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
> >>>>>> until
> >>>>>>>>>>>> further notice.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> >>>>>>>>>>> left one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
> >>>>>> reviewed and
> >>>>>>>>>>> even
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> >>>>>>>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
> >>>>>> think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
> >>>>>> I'll
> >>>>>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
> >>>>>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> >>>>>>>>>>> be coming
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>>> (almost
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> >>>>>>>>>>> 13:34写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> >>>>>>>>>>> has been
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
> >>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> >>>>>>>>>>> libenchao@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> >>>>>>>>>>> the PR.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
> >>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collectively
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> >>>>>>>>>>> does not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> >>>>>>>>>>> for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> >>>>>>>>>>> should be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> >>>>>>>>>>> October is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> >>>>>>>>>>> in #1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> >>>>>>>>>>> marked
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> >>>>>>>>>>> now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> >>>>>>>>>>> thorough
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> >>>>>>>>>>> calcite's MAP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> >>>>>>>>>>> we can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
> >>>>>> review
> >>>>>>>>>>> it. many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
> >>>>>> 11:02写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> >>>>>>>>>>> release [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> >>>>>>>>>>> Github [3],
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
> >>>>>> clean
> >>>>>>>>>>> up our
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
> >>>>>> I'd
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
> >>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>> give us
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> >>>>>>>>>>> do you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> >>>>>>>>>>> be:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> >>>>>>>>>>> shape and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
> >>>>>> best
> >>>>>>>>>>> to get
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> >>>>>>>>>>> introduced by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> >>>>>>>>>>> whether it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>.
I do see 1.36.0 on ASF Nexus (https://repository.apache.org/) I wonder
if it's just replication lag.
On 10/11/2023 9:07 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I met some problems while publishing.
>
> The command I'm using is `./gradlew publishDist -Prc=0 -Pasf
> -Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITHUB`. Although the command ran
> successfully, I noticed the 'releaseRepository' prints somethings
> wield, and actually there is no 1.36.0 in nexus yet[1]. , Below is all
> the output from it:
>
> Starting a Gradle Daemon (subsequent builds will be faster)
>
>> Configure project :
> Building Apache Calcite 1.36.0
>
>> Task :publishSvnDist
> Listing SVN folders [dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0] at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
> Executing svnmucc. root=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist,
> message=Promoting Apache Calcite calcite-1.36.0-rc0 -> calcite-1.36.0
> to release area, commands:
> mkdir
> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0
> cp
> 65079
> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
> cp
> 65079
> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
> cp
> 65079
> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
> rm
> dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0
> r65191 committed by libenchao at 2023-11-10T08:56:00.445211Z
>
>> Task :releaseRepository
> Initialized stagingRepositoryId orgapachecalcite-1219 for repository nexus
> GET request failed. 404: Not Found, body: [errors:[[id:*, msg:No such
> repository: orgapachecalcite-1219]]]
> Requested operation was executed successfully in attempt 83 (maximum
> allowed 601)
>
>> Task :createReleaseTag
> Created tag calcite-1.36.0 ->
> Ref[refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0=450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c(-1)]
>
>> Task :pushReleaseTag
> Pushing tag to Git remote release-origin: https://github.com/apache/calcite.git
> Message from release-origin:
> refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0: OK,
> 450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c (fastForward)
>
> Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it
> incompatible with Gradle 8.0.
>
> You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation
> warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins.
>
> See https://docs.gradle.org/7.6.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings
>
> BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 5m 4s
> 34 actionable tasks: 4 executed, 30 up-to-date
>
>
> [1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.calcite/calcite-core
>
> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 11:18写道：
>>
>> Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks great, Tanner!
>>>
>>> As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's
>>> remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>>>
>>> On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote:
>>>> Ok I believe I reset main to
>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>>>> .
>>>> Feel free to take a look at
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
>>>> and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
>>>> thanks for your patience.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Tanner
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
>>>>> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tanner,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
>>>>>> commit(
>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>>>>>> ),
>>>>>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
>>>>>> ,
>>>>>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
>>>>>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>>>>>> will be invalid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
>>>>>> handling
>>>>>>> the release!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
>>>>>> francischuang@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>>>> for 1.36.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be
>>> reverted
>>>>>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Francis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Benchao
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
>>>>>> start the
>>>>>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>> further notice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
>>>>>>>>>>> left one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
>>>>>> reviewed and
>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
>>>>>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
>>>>>> think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
>>>>>> I'll
>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
>>>>>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
>>>>>>>>>>> be coming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
>>>>>>>>>>> (almost
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
>>>>>>>>>>> 13:34写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
>>>>>>>>>>> has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
>>>>>>>>>>> libenchao@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
>>>>>>>>>>> the PR.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collectively
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
>>>>>>>>>>> does not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
>>>>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
>>>>>>>>>>> October is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
>>>>>>>>>>> in #1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
>>>>>>>>>>> marked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
>>>>>>>>>>> thorough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
>>>>>>>>>>> calcite's MAP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
>>>>>>>>>>> we can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
>>>>>> review
>>>>>>>>>>> it. many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
>>>>>> 11:02写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
>>>>>>>>>>> release [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
>>>>>>>>>>> Github [3],
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
>>>>>> clean
>>>>>>>>>>> up our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
>>>>>> I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>> give us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
>>>>>>>>>>> do you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
>>>>>>>>>>> be:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
>>>>>>>>>>> shape and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
>>>>>> best
>>>>>>>>>>> to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
>>>>>>>>>>> introduced by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
>>>>>>>>>>> whether it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>.
Hi all,
I met some problems while publishing.
The command I'm using is `./gradlew publishDist -Prc=0 -Pasf
-Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITHUB`. Although the command ran
successfully, I noticed the 'releaseRepository' prints somethings
wield, and actually there is no 1.36.0 in nexus yet[1]. , Below is all
the output from it:
Starting a Gradle Daemon (subsequent builds will be faster)
> Configure project :
Building Apache Calcite 1.36.0
> Task :publishSvnDist
Listing SVN folders [dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0] at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
Executing svnmucc. root=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist,
message=Promoting Apache Calcite calcite-1.36.0-rc0 -> calcite-1.36.0
to release area, commands:
mkdir
release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0
cp
65079
dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
cp
65079
dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.asc
cp
65079
dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
release/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0/apache-calcite-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
rm
dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.36.0-rc0
r65191 committed by libenchao at 2023-11-10T08:56:00.445211Z
> Task :releaseRepository
Initialized stagingRepositoryId orgapachecalcite-1219 for repository nexus
GET request failed. 404: Not Found, body: [errors:[[id:*, msg:No such
repository: orgapachecalcite-1219]]]
Requested operation was executed successfully in attempt 83 (maximum
allowed 601)
> Task :createReleaseTag
Created tag calcite-1.36.0 ->
Ref[refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0=450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c(-1)]
> Task :pushReleaseTag
Pushing tag to Git remote release-origin: https://github.com/apache/calcite.git
Message from release-origin:
refs/tags/calcite-1.36.0: OK,
450f51a96db8253e0ae62661e3be46a707a2cd8c (fastForward)
Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it
incompatible with Gradle 8.0.
You can use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation
warnings and determine if they come from your own scripts or plugins.
See https://docs.gradle.org/7.6.1/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings
BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 5m 4s
34 actionable tasks: 4 executed, 30 up-to-date
[1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.calcite/calcite-core
Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 11:18写道：
>
> Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased.
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Looks great, Tanner!
> >
> > As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's
> > remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> >
> > On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote:
> > > Ok I believe I reset main to
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> > > .
> > > Feel free to take a look at
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
> > > and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
> > > thanks for your patience.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Tanner
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
> > >> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
> > >>
> > >> Tanner
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Tanner,
> > >>>
> > >>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
> > >>> commit(
> > >>>
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> > >>> ),
> > >>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
> > >>> ,
> > >>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
> > >>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> > >>> will be invalid.
> > >>>
> > >>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
> > >>> handling
> > >>>> the release!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Tanner
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best,
> > >>>>> Tanner
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
> > >>> francischuang@apache.org>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
> > >>> voting
> > >>>>>> for 1.36.0.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be
> > reverted
> > >>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Francis
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Hi, Benchao
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review:
> > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
> > >>> start the
> > >>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
> > >>> until
> > >>>>>>>>> further notice.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
> > >>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> > >>>>>>>> left one
> > >>>>>>>>>>> comments
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
> > >>> in
> > >>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
> > >>> reviewed and
> > >>>>>>>> even
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> > >>>>>>>> merged
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> > >>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
> > >>> think?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
> > >>> I'll
> > >>>>>>>> start
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
> > >>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> > >>>>>>>> be coming
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> > >>>>>>>> (almost
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ready):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> > >>>>>>>> 13:34写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> > >>>>>>>> has been
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> someone
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
> > >>> they
> > >>>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> > >>>>>>>> libenchao@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> > >>>>>>>> the PR.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
> > >>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> collectively
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> > >>>>>>>> does not
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> include
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> > >>>>>>>> for the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> tests
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> > >>>>>>>> should be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> > >>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> > >>>>>>>> October is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> > >>>>>>>> in #1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
> > >>> to
> > >>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> > >>>>>>>> marked
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> blocked
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> > >>>>>>>> now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> > >>>>>>>> thorough
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> > >>>>>>>> calcite's MAP
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> > >>>>>>>> we can
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
> > >>> review
> > >>>>>>>> it. many
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
> > >>> 11:02写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> > >>>>>>>> release [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> > >>>>>>>> Github [3],
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> > >>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
> > >>> clean
> > >>>>>>>> up our
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
> > >>> I'd
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> propose to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
> > >>> will
> > >>>>>>>> give us
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> > >>>>>>>> do you
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> > >>>>>>>> be:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> > >>>>>>>> shape and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
> > >>> to
> > >>>>>>>> 1.36.0,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
> > >>> best
> > >>>>>>>> to get
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> > >>>>>>>> introduced by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> > >>>>>>>> whether it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> is a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Benchao Li
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.INVALID>.
Sounds good, I'll keep track of that and make sure it gets rebased.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Looks great, Tanner!
>
> As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's
> remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>
> On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote:
> > Ok I believe I reset main to
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> > .
> > Feel free to take a look at
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
> > and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
> > thanks for your patience.
> >
> > Best,
> > Tanner
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
> >> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
> >>
> >> Tanner
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Tanner,
> >>>
> >>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
> >>> commit(
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> >>> ),
> >>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
> >>> ,
> >>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
> >>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> >>> will be invalid.
> >>>
> >>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
> >>>>
> >>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
> >>>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
> >>>>
> >>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
> >>> handling
> >>>> the release!
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Tanner
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Tanner
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
> >>> francischuang@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
> >>> voting
> >>>>>> for 1.36.0.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be
> reverted
> >>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Francis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi, Benchao
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review:
> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
> >>> start the
> >>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
> >>> until
> >>>>>>>>> further notice.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
> >>> and
> >>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the
> >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> >>>>>>>> left one
> >>>>>>>>>>> comments
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
> >>> in
> >>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
> >>> reviewed and
> >>>>>>>> even
> >>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> >>>>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> >>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
> >>> think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
> >>> I'll
> >>>>>>>> start
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
> >>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> >>>>>>>> be coming
> >>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> >>>>>>>> (almost
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ready):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> >>>>>>>> 13:34写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> >>>>>>>> has been
> >>>>>>>>>>>> someone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
> >>> they
> >>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> >>>>>>>> libenchao@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> >>>>>>>> the PR.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
> >>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>> collectively
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> >>>>>>>> does not
> >>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> >>>>>>>> for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> >>>>>>>> should be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> >>>>>>>> 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> >>>>>>>> October is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> >>>>>>>> in #1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> >>>>>>>> marked
> >>>>>>>>>>>> blocked
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> >>>>>>>> now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> >>>>>>>> thorough
> >>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> >>>>>>>> calcite's MAP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> >>>>>>>> we can
> >>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
> >>> review
> >>>>>>>> it. many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
> >>> 11:02写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> >>>>>>>> release [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> >>>>>>>> Github [3],
> >>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
> >>> clean
> >>>>>>>> up our
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
> >>> I'd
> >>>>>>>>>>>> propose to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
> >>> will
> >>>>>>>> give us
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> >>>>>>>> do you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> >>>>>>>> be:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> >>>>>>>> shape and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>> 1.36.0,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
> >>> best
> >>>>>>>> to get
> >>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> >>>>>>>> introduced by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> >>>>>>>> whether it
> >>>>>>>>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Benchao Li
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>.
Looks great, Tanner!
As the original PR has been merged and cannot be reopened, let's
remember to rebase the commit onto main after 1.36.0 has been released.
On 8/11/2023 1:58 pm, Tanner Clary wrote:
> Ok I believe I reset main to
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> .
> Feel free to take a look at https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
> and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
> thanks for your patience.
>
> Best,
> Tanner
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
>> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
>>
>> Tanner
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Tanner,
>>>
>>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
>>> commit(
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>>> ),
>>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
>>> ,
>>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
>>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>>> will be invalid.
>>>
>>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
>>>>
>>>> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
>>> handling
>>>> the release!
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Tanner
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Tanner
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
>>> francischuang@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
>>> voting
>>>>>> for 1.36.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be reverted
>>>>>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Francis
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi, Benchao
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The release note PR is now available for review:
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
>>> start the
>>>>>>>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
>>> until
>>>>>>>>> further notice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> start the releasing process?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Itiel,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewd the
>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
>>>>>>>> left one
>>>>>>>>>>> comments
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai,
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
>>> in
>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Itiel,
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
>>> reviewed and
>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
>>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>> in 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4455,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
>>> think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
>>> I'll
>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
>>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
>>>>>>>> be coming
>>>>>>>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
>>>>>>>> (almost
>>>>>>>>>>>> ready):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
>>>>>>>> 13:34写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
>>>>>>>> has been
>>>>>>>>>>>> someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
>>> they
>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
>>>>>>>> libenchao@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
>>>>>>>> the PR.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>> collectively
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
>>>>>>>> does not
>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amended
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
>>>>>>>> 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
>>>>>>>> October is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
>>>>>>>> in #1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
>>> to
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
>>>>>>>> marked
>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
>>>>>>>> thorough
>>>>>>>>>>>> solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
>>>>>>>> calcite's MAP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
>>>>>>>> we can
>>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
>>> review
>>>>>>>> it. many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
>>> 11:02写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
>>>>>>>> release [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
>>>>>>>> Github [3],
>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
>>> clean
>>>>>>>> up our
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
>>> I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>> propose to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
>>> will
>>>>>>>> give us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
>>>>>>>> do you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
>>>>>>>> be:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
>>>>>>>> shape and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
>>> to
>>>>>>>> 1.36.0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
>>> best
>>>>>>>> to get
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
>>>>>>>> introduced by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
>>>>>>>> whether it
>>>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Benchao Li
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.INVALID>.
Ok I believe I reset main to
https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
.
Feel free to take a look at https://github.com/apache/calcite/commits/main
and let me know if I've made any mistakes. Sorry for any confusion and
thanks for your patience.
Best,
Tanner
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:54 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com> wrote:
> Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
> commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
>
> Tanner
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Tanner,
>>
>> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
>> commit(
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>> ),
>> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
>> ,
>> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
>> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
>> will be invalid.
>>
>> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
>> >
>> > The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
>> >
>> > Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
>> handling
>> > the release!
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Tanner
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Tanner
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
>> francischuang@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
>> voting
>> > >> for 1.36.0.
>> > >>
>> > >> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be reverted
>> > >> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>> > >>
>> > >> Francis
>> > >>
>> > >> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
>> > >> > Hi, Benchao
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Is the main branch still frozen?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [1]
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> The release note PR is now available for review:
>> > >> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> Hi devs,
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll
>> start the
>> > >> >>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze
>> until
>> > >> >>> further notice.
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
>> and
>> > >> >>>> start the releasing process?
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> Hi Itiel,
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> I have reviewd the
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
>> > >> >> left one
>> > >> >>>>> comments
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> Mihai,
>> > >> >>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it
>> in
>> > >> >> 1.36.0
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> Itiel,
>> > >> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been
>> reviewed and
>> > >> >> even
>> > >> >>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
>> > >> >> merged
>> > >> >>>>>> in 1.36.0
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
>> > >> >>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
>> > >> >>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> Mihai
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> ________________________________
>> > >> >>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>> > >> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
>> > >> >>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>> > >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
>> > >> >> CALCITE-4455,
>> > >> >>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
>> think?
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then
>> I'll
>> > >> >> start
>> > >> >>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <
>> chucheng.tr@gmail.com>
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
>> > >> >> be coming
>> > >> >>>>>> soon.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
>> > >> >> (almost
>> > >> >>>>>> ready):
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
>> > >> >> 13:34写道：
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
>> > >> >> has been
>> > >> >>>>>> someone
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>
>> > >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe
>> they
>> > >> >> should
>> > >> >>>>>> be
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
>> > >> >> libenchao@apache.org>
>> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
>> > >> >> the PR.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which
>> should
>> > >> >>>>>> collectively
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
>> > >> >> does not
>> > >> >>>>>> include
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
>> > >> >> for the
>> > >> >>>>>> tests
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> to
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
>> > >> >> should be
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> amended
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
>> > >> >> 1.36.0
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
>> > >> >> October is
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
>> > >> >> in #1.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising
>> to
>> > >> >> be
>> > >> >>>>>> merged
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> shortly
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
>> > >> >> marked
>> > >> >>>>>> blocked
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
>> > >> >> now.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
>> > >> >> thorough
>> > >> >>>>>> solution.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
>> > >> >> calcite's MAP
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
>> > >> >> we can
>> > >> >>>>>> fix it
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> in
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to
>> review
>> > >> >> it. many
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
>> 11:02写道：
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
>> > >> >> release [1]
>> > >> >>>>>> and
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
>> > >> >> Github [3],
>> > >> >>>>>> there
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
>> > >> >> the
>> > >> >>>>>> release.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to
>> clean
>> > >> >> up our
>> > >> >>>>>> 1.36
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
>> I'd
>> > >> >>>>>> propose to
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this
>> will
>> > >> >> give us
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> about
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
>> > >> >> do you
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> think?
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
>> > >> >> be:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
>> > >> >> shape and
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> want
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion
>> to
>> > >> >> 1.36.0,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> this
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our
>> best
>> > >> >> to get
>> > >> >>>>>> it
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> in.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
>> > >> >> introduced by
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
>> > >> >> whether it
>> > >> >>>>>> is a
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> > >> >> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>
>> > >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> Best,
>> > >> >>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> Best,
>> > >> >>>>>> Benchao Li
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>> --
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>> Best,
>> > >> >>>> Benchao Li
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> --
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> Best,
>> > >> >>> Benchao Li
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> --
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Best,
>> > >> >> Benchao Li
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best,
>> Benchao Li
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.INVALID>.
Oops I took revert too literally. I can reset it two commits (the revert
commit and the commit I reverted). Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Tanner
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> Tanner,
>
> By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
> commit(
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> ),
> and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561
> ,
> after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
> preparing for next version, then all the commits after
>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
> will be invalid.
>
> Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
> >
> > The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
> >
> > Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
> handling
> > the release!
> >
> > Best,
> > Tanner
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Tanner
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <
> francischuang@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still voting
> > >> for 1.36.0.
> > >>
> > >> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be reverted
> > >> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> > >>
> > >> Francis
> > >>
> > >> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> > >> > Hi, Benchao
> > >> >
> > >> > Is the main branch still frozen?
> > >> >
> > >> > I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]
> > >> >
> > >>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> The release note PR is now available for review:
> > >> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Hi devs,
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll start
> the
> > >> >>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze until
> > >> >>> further notice.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it
> and
> > >> >>>> start the releasing process?
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Hi Itiel,
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> I have reviewd the
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> > >> >> left one
> > >> >>>>> comments
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Mihai,
> > >> >>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in
> > >> >> 1.36.0
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Itiel,
> > >> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed
> and
> > >> >> even
> > >> >>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> > >> >> merged
> > >> >>>>>> in 1.36.0
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> > >> >>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> > >> >>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Mihai
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >> >>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > >> >>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> > >> >> CALCITE-4455,
> > >> >>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
> think?
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll
> > >> >> start
> > >> >>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <chucheng.tr@gmail.com
> >
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> > >> >> be coming
> > >> >>>>>> soon.
> > >> >>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> > >> >> (almost
> > >> >>>>>> ready):
> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> > >> >> 13:34写道：
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> > >> >> has been
> > >> >>>>>> someone
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they
> > >> >> should
> > >> >>>>>> be
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> > >> >> libenchao@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> > >> >> the PR.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
> > >> >>>>>> collectively
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> > >> >> does not
> > >> >>>>>> include
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> > >> >> for the
> > >> >>>>>> tests
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> > >> >> should be
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> amended
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> > >> >> 1.36.0
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> > >> >> October is
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> > >> >> in #1.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to
> > >> >> be
> > >> >>>>>> merged
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> shortly
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> > >> >> marked
> > >> >>>>>> blocked
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> > >> >> now.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> > >> >> thorough
> > >> >>>>>> solution.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> > >> >> calcite's MAP
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> > >> >> we can
> > >> >>>>>> fix it
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> in
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review
> > >> >> it. many
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日
> 11:02写道：
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> > >> >> release [1]
> > >> >>>>>> and
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> > >> >> Github [3],
> > >> >>>>>> there
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> > >> >> the
> > >> >>>>>> release.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean
> > >> >> up our
> > >> >>>>>> 1.36
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state.
> I'd
> > >> >>>>>> propose to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will
> > >> >> give us
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> about
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> > >> >> do you
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> think?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> > >> >> be:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> > >> >> shape and
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> want
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to
> > >> >> 1.36.0,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> this
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best
> > >> >> to get
> > >> >>>>>> it
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> in.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> > >> >> introduced by
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> > >> >> whether it
> > >> >>>>>> is a
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >> >> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Best,
> > >> >>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> --
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Best,
> > >> >>>> Benchao Li
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> --
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Best,
> > >> >>> Benchao Li
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Best,
> > >> >> Benchao Li
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> Benchao Li
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>.
Tanner,
By saying "revert", I think we actually mean "reset to earlier
commit(https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376),
and force push main branch". Because the commit we are voting on is
https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/0be8eaebcf27afae9ecda8ab79db63c214426561,
after the voting, I'll push it to main with additional commits
preparing for next version, then all the commits after
https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/4c9011c388f826c36463ae7da875ddb525104376
will be invalid.
Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:43写道：
>
> The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
>
> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for handling
> the release!
>
> Best,
> Tanner
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com> wrote:
>
> > I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
> >
> > Best,
> > Tanner
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still voting
> >> for 1.36.0.
> >>
> >> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be reverted
> >> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> >>
> >> Francis
> >>
> >> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> >> > Hi, Benchao
> >> >
> >> > Is the main branch still frozen?
> >> >
> >> > I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
> >> >
> >> > [1]
> >> >
> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The release note PR is now available for review:
> >> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
> >> >>
> >> >> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi devs,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll start the
> >> >>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze until
> >> >>> further notice.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it and
> >> >>>> start the releasing process?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Hi Itiel,
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> >> >> left one
> >> >>>>> comments
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Mihai,
> >> >>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in
> >> >> 1.36.0
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Itiel,
> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and
> >> >> even
> >> >>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> >> >> merged
> >> >>>>>> in 1.36.0
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> >> >>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> >> >>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Mihai
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> ________________________________
> >> >>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> >> >> CALCITE-4455,
> >> >>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll
> >> >> start
> >> >>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> >> >> be coming
> >> >>>>>> soon.
> >> >>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> >> >> (almost
> >> >>>>>> ready):
> >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >> >>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> >> >> 13:34写道：
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> >> >>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> >> >> has been
> >> >>>>>> someone
> >> >>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> >> >>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> >> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> >> >>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they
> >> >> should
> >> >>>>>> be
> >> >>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> >> >> libenchao@apache.org>
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> >> >> the PR.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
> >> >>>>>> collectively
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> >> >> does not
> >> >>>>>> include
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> >> >> for the
> >> >>>>>> tests
> >> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> >> >> should be
> >> >>>>>>>>>> amended
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> >> >> 1.36.0
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> >> >> October is
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> >> >> in #1.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to
> >> >> be
> >> >>>>>> merged
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> shortly
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> >> >> marked
> >> >>>>>> blocked
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> >> >> now.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> >> >> thorough
> >> >>>>>> solution.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> >> >> calcite's MAP
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> >> >> we can
> >> >>>>>> fix it
> >> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review
> >> >> it. many
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> >> >> release [1]
> >> >>>>>> and
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> >> >> Github [3],
> >> >>>>>> there
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> >> >> the
> >> >>>>>> release.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean
> >> >> up our
> >> >>>>>> 1.36
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd
> >> >>>>>> propose to
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will
> >> >> give us
> >> >>>>>>>>>> about
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> >> >> do you
> >> >>>>>>>>>> think?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> >> >> be:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> >> >> shape and
> >> >>>>>>>>>> want
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to
> >> >> 1.36.0,
> >> >>>>>>>>>> this
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best
> >> >> to get
> >> >>>>>> it
> >> >>>>>>>>>> in.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> >> >> introduced by
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> >> >> whether it
> >> >>>>>> is a
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >> >> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Best,
> >> >>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Best,
> >> >>>>>> Benchao Li
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Best,
> >> >>>> Benchao Li
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Best,
> >> >>> Benchao Li
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> Best,
> >> >> Benchao Li
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.INVALID>.
The commit reverting 3154708 is here:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for handling
the release!
Best,
Tanner
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com> wrote:
> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
>
> Best,
> Tanner
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still voting
>> for 1.36.0.
>>
>> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be reverted
>> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>>
>> Francis
>>
>> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
>> > Hi, Benchao
>> >
>> > Is the main branch still frozen?
>> >
>> > I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
>> >
>> > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The release note PR is now available for review:
>> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
>> >>
>> >> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi devs,
>> >>>
>> >>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll start the
>> >>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze until
>> >>> further notice.
>> >>>
>> >>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
>> >>>>
>> >>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it and
>> >>>> start the releasing process?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi Itiel,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
>> >> left one
>> >>>>> comments
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Mihai,
>> >>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in
>> >> 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Itiel,
>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and
>> >> even
>> >>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
>> >> merged
>> >>>>>> in 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
>> >>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
>> >>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Mihai
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> ________________________________
>> >>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
>> >>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
>> >> CALCITE-4455,
>> >>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll
>> >> start
>> >>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
>> >> be coming
>> >>>>>> soon.
>> >>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
>> >> (almost
>> >>>>>> ready):
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
>> >> 13:34写道：
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
>> >>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
>> >> has been
>> >>>>>> someone
>> >>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
>> >>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
>> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
>> >>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they
>> >> should
>> >>>>>> be
>> >>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
>> >> libenchao@apache.org>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
>> >> the PR.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
>> >>>>>> collectively
>> >>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
>> >> does not
>> >>>>>> include
>> >>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
>> >> for the
>> >>>>>> tests
>> >>>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
>> >> should be
>> >>>>>>>>>> amended
>> >>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
>> >> 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
>> >> October is
>> >>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
>> >> in #1.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to
>> >> be
>> >>>>>> merged
>> >>>>>>>>>>> shortly
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
>> >> marked
>> >>>>>> blocked
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
>> >> now.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
>> >> thorough
>> >>>>>> solution.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
>> >> calcite's MAP
>> >>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
>> >> we can
>> >>>>>> fix it
>> >>>>>>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review
>> >> it. many
>> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
>> >> release [1]
>> >>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
>> >> Github [3],
>> >>>>>> there
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
>> >> the
>> >>>>>> release.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean
>> >> up our
>> >>>>>> 1.36
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd
>> >>>>>> propose to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will
>> >> give us
>> >>>>>>>>>> about
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
>> >> do you
>> >>>>>>>>>> think?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
>> >> be:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
>> >> shape and
>> >>>>>>>>>> want
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to
>> >> 1.36.0,
>> >>>>>>>>>> this
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best
>> >> to get
>> >>>>>> it
>> >>>>>>>>>> in.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
>> >> introduced by
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
>> >> whether it
>> >>>>>> is a
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> >> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Best,
>> >>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Best,
>> >>>>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Best,
>> >>>> Benchao Li
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Best,
>> >>> Benchao Li
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Benchao Li
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>.
Yes, it's still frozen until further notice. Thanks Jiajun for
spotting it, and Tanner for volunteering to help revert it.
Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.invalid> 于2023年11月8日周三 10:35写道：
>
> I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
>
> Best,
> Tanner
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still voting
> > for 1.36.0.
> >
> > I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be reverted
> > and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
> >
> > Francis
> >
> > On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> > > Hi, Benchao
> > >
> > > Is the main branch still frozen?
> > >
> > > I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
> > >
> > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> The release note PR is now available for review:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
> > >>
> > >> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi devs,
> > >>>
> > >>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll start the
> > >>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze until
> > >>> further notice.
> > >>>
> > >>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it and
> > >>>> start the releasing process?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Itiel,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> > >> left one
> > >>>>> comments
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Mihai,
> > >>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in
> > >> 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Itiel,
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and
> > >> even
> > >>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> > >> merged
> > >>>>>> in 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> > >>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> > >>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Mihai
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > >>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> > >> CALCITE-4455,
> > >>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll
> > >> start
> > >>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> > >> be coming
> > >>>>>> soon.
> > >>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> > >> (almost
> > >>>>>> ready):
> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> > >> 13:34写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> > >>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> > >> has been
> > >>>>>> someone
> > >>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> > >>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> > >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> > >>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they
> > >> should
> > >>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> > >> libenchao@apache.org>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> > >> the PR.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
> > >>>>>> collectively
> > >>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> > >> does not
> > >>>>>> include
> > >>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> > >> for the
> > >>>>>> tests
> > >>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> > >> should be
> > >>>>>>>>>> amended
> > >>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> > >> 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> > >> October is
> > >>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> > >> in #1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to
> > >> be
> > >>>>>> merged
> > >>>>>>>>>>> shortly
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> > >> marked
> > >>>>>> blocked
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> > >> now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> > >> thorough
> > >>>>>> solution.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> > >> calcite's MAP
> > >>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> > >> we can
> > >>>>>> fix it
> > >>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review
> > >> it. many
> > >>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> > >> release [1]
> > >>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> > >> Github [3],
> > >>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> > >> the
> > >>>>>> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean
> > >> up our
> > >>>>>> 1.36
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd
> > >>>>>> propose to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will
> > >> give us
> > >>>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> > >> do you
> > >>>>>>>>>> think?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> > >> be:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> > >> shape and
> > >>>>>>>>>> want
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to
> > >> 1.36.0,
> > >>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best
> > >> to get
> > >>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>> in.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> > >> introduced by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> > >> whether it
> > >>>>>> is a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Benchao Li
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Benchao Li
> > >>
> > >
> >
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Tanner Clary <ta...@google.com.INVALID>.
I can revert it if that's alright, hope this helps!
Best,
Tanner
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:01 PM Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
wrote:
> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still voting
> for 1.36.0.
>
> I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be reverted
> and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
>
> Francis
>
> On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> > Hi, Benchao
> >
> > Is the main branch still frozen?
> >
> > I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> The release note PR is now available for review:
> >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
> >>
> >> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> >>>
> >>> Hi devs,
> >>>
> >>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll start the
> >>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze until
> >>> further notice.
> >>>
> >>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> >>>>
> >>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it and
> >>>> start the releasing process?
> >>>>
> >>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Itiel,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> >> left one
> >>>>> comments
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Mihai,
> >>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in
> >> 1.36.0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Itiel,
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and
> >> even
> >>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> >> merged
> >>>>>> in 1.36.0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> >>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> >>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Mihai
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> >>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> >> CALCITE-4455,
> >>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll
> >> start
> >>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> >> be coming
> >>>>>> soon.
> >>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> >> (almost
> >>>>>> ready):
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> >> 13:34写道：
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> >>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> >> has been
> >>>>>> someone
> >>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> >>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> >>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> >>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they
> >> should
> >>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> >> libenchao@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> >> the PR.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
> >>>>>> collectively
> >>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> >> does not
> >>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> >> for the
> >>>>>> tests
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> >> should be
> >>>>>>>>>> amended
> >>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> >> 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> >> October is
> >>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> >> in #1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to
> >> be
> >>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>> shortly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> >> marked
> >>>>>> blocked
> >>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> >> now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> >> thorough
> >>>>>> solution.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> >> calcite's MAP
> >>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> >> we can
> >>>>>> fix it
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review
> >> it. many
> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> >> release [1]
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> >> Github [3],
> >>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> >> the
> >>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean
> >> up our
> >>>>>> 1.36
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd
> >>>>>> propose to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will
> >> give us
> >>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> >> do you
> >>>>>>>>>> think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> >> be:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> >> shape and
> >>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to
> >> 1.36.0,
> >>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best
> >> to get
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>> in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> >> introduced by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> >> whether it
> >>>>>> is a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Benchao Li
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Benchao Li
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Benchao Li
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Benchao Li
> >>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>.
I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still voting
for 1.36.0.
I think 14ed78f22eb854fe4643c6e1faad5b0824733515 needs to be reverted
and then rebased on to main after 1.36.0 has been released.
Francis
On 8/11/2023 12:58 pm, Jiajun Xie wrote:
> Hi, Benchao
>
> Is the main branch still frozen?
>
> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
>
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> The release note PR is now available for review:
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
>>
>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
>>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll start the
>>> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze until
>>> further notice.
>>>
>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
>>>>
>>>> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it and
>>>> start the releasing process?
>>>>
>>>> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Itiel,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
>> left one
>>>>> comments
>>>>>
>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mihai,
>>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in
>> 1.36.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Itiel,
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and
>> even
>>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
>> merged
>>>>>> in 1.36.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
>>>>>>> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
>>>>>>> But we can leave it for later.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
>> CALCITE-4455,
>>>>>>> I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll
>> start
>>>>>>> the release process after they are merged.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
>> be coming
>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
>> (almost
>>>>>> ready):
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
>> 13:34写道：
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
>>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
>> has been
>>>>>> someone
>>>>>>>>>> reviewed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
>>>>>>>>>> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
>>>>>>>>>> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they
>> should
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> resolved soon.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
>> libenchao@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
>> the PR.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
>>>>>> collectively
>>>>>>>>>>> fix them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
>> does not
>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
>> for the
>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
>> should be
>>>>>>>>>> amended
>>>>>>>>>>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mihai
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
>> 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
>> October is
>>>>>>>>>>> approaching.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
>> in #1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to
>> be
>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> #4. blocker issues status
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
>> marked
>>>>>> blocked
>>>>>>>>>>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
>> thorough
>>>>>> solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, community.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
>> calcite's MAP
>>>>>>>>>>> SubQuery
>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
>> we can
>>>>>> fix it
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.36.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review
>> it. many
>>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran Tao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
>> release [1]
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
>> Github [3],
>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
>> the
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean
>> up our
>>>>>> 1.36
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd
>>>>>> propose to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will
>> give us
>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
>> do you
>>>>>>>>>> think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
>> be:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
>> shape and
>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to
>> 1.36.0,
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best
>> to get
>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
>> introduced by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
>> whether it
>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Benchao Li
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Benchao Li
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Benchao Li
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best,
>> Benchao Li
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Benchao
Is the main branch still frozen?
I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> The release note PR is now available for review:
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
>
> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> >
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll start the
> > release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze until
> > further notice.
> >
> > Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> > >
> > > @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it and
> > > start the releasing process?
> > >
> > > LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> > > >
> > > > Hi Itiel,
> > > >
> > > > I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> left one
> > > > comments
> > > >
> > > > Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> > > >
> > > > > Mihai,
> > > > > I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in
> 1.36.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Itiel,
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and
> even
> > > > > with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> merged
> > > > > in 1.36.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> > > > > > I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> > > > > > But we can leave it for later.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mihai
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > > > > > To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
> CALCITE-4455,
> > > > > > I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll
> start
> > > > > > the release process after they are merged.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The expected release time at the end of the month seems to
> be coming
> > > > > soon.
> > > > > > > > I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> (almost
> > > > > ready):
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > Ran Tao
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六
> 13:34写道：
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi, all:
> > > > > > > >> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> has been
> > > > > someone
> > > > > > > >> reviewed.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> > > > > > > >> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> > > > > > > >> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> > > > > > > >> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they
> should
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > >> resolved soon.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <
> libenchao@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at
> the PR.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
> > > > > collectively
> > > > > > > >>> fix them.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> > > > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but
> does not
> > > > > include
> > > > > > > >>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well
> for the
> > > > > tests
> > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > >>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > > > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but
> should be
> > > > > > > >> amended
> > > > > > > >>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Mihai
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> ________________________________
> > > > > > > >>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > > > > > > >>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > > > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted
> 1.36.0
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of
> October is
> > > > > > > >>> approaching.
> > > > > > > >>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues
> in #1.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to
> be
> > > > > merged
> > > > > > > >>> shortly
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> #4. blocker issues status
> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is
> marked
> > > > > blocked
> > > > > > > >>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921
> now.
> > > > > > > >>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more
> thorough
> > > > > solution.
> > > > > > > >>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Hi, community.
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that
> calcite's MAP
> > > > > > > >>> SubQuery
> > > > > > > >>>>> doesn't work,
> > > > > > > >>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe
> we can
> > > > > fix it
> > > > > > > >> in
> > > > > > > >>>>> 1.36.
> > > > > > > >>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review
> it. many
> > > > > > > >>> thanks.
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Best Regards,
> > > > > > > >>>>> Ran Tao
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last
> release [1]
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > >>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and
> Github [3],
> > > > > there
> > > > > > > >>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of
> the
> > > > > release.
> > > > > > > >>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean
> up our
> > > > > 1.36
> > > > > > > >>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd
> > > > > propose to
> > > > > > > >>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will
> give us
> > > > > > > >> about
> > > > > > > >>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What
> do you
> > > > > > > >> think?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would
> be:
> > > > > > > >>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> > > > > > > >>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > > > > > > >>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good
> shape and
> > > > > > > >> want
> > > > > > > >>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to
> 1.36.0,
> > > > > > > >> this
> > > > > > > >>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best
> to get
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > >> in.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's
> introduced by
> > > > > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check
> whether it
> > > > > is a
> > > > > > > >>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> [1]
> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> > > > > > > >>>>>> [2]
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > > > > >>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > > > > > > >>>>>> [4]
> > > > > > > >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > > > > > > >>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > > > > >>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Best,
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Benchao Li
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Best,
> > > > > > > >>>> Benchao Li
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> --
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Best,
> > > > > > > >>> Benchao Li
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Benchao Li
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Benchao Li
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Benchao Li
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best,
> > Benchao Li
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> Benchao Li
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>.
The release note PR is now available for review:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505
Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
>
> Hi devs,
>
> All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll start the
> release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze until
> further notice.
>
> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
> >
> > @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it and
> > start the releasing process?
> >
> > LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> > >
> > > Hi Itiel,
> > >
> > > I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and left one
> > > comments
> > >
> > > Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> > >
> > > > Mihai,
> > > > I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in 1.36.0
> > > >
> > > > Itiel,
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and even
> > > > with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it merged
> > > > in 1.36.0
> > > >
> > > > Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> > > > > I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> > > > > But we can leave it for later.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mihai
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > > > > To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and CALCITE-4455,
> > > > > I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > > > Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll start
> > > > > the release process after they are merged.
> > > > >
> > > > > Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The expected release time at the end of the month seems to be coming
> > > > soon.
> > > > > > > I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days (almost
> > > > ready):
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > Ran Tao
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六 13:34写道：
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi, all:
> > > > > > >> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues has been
> > > > someone
> > > > > > >> reviewed.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> > > > > > >> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> > > > > > >> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> > > > > > >> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they should
> > > > be
> > > > > > >> resolved soon.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at the PR.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
> > > > collectively
> > > > > > >>> fix them.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> > > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but does not
> > > > include
> > > > > > >>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well for the
> > > > tests
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but should be
> > > > > > >> amended
> > > > > > >>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Mihai
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> ________________________________
> > > > > > >>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > > > > > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > > > > > >>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted 1.36.0
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of October is
> > > > > > >>> approaching.
> > > > > > >>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues in #1.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to be
> > > > merged
> > > > > > >>> shortly
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> #4. blocker issues status
> > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is marked
> > > > blocked
> > > > > > >>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921 now.
> > > > > > >>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more thorough
> > > > solution.
> > > > > > >>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Hi, community.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that calcite's MAP
> > > > > > >>> SubQuery
> > > > > > >>>>> doesn't work,
> > > > > > >>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe we can
> > > > fix it
> > > > > > >> in
> > > > > > >>>>> 1.36.
> > > > > > >>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review it. many
> > > > > > >>> thanks.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Best Regards,
> > > > > > >>>>> Ran Tao
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last release [1]
> > > > and
> > > > > > >>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and Github [3],
> > > > there
> > > > > > >>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of the
> > > > release.
> > > > > > >>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean up our
> > > > 1.36
> > > > > > >>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd
> > > > propose to
> > > > > > >>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will give us
> > > > > > >> about
> > > > > > >>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What do you
> > > > > > >> think?
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would be:
> > > > > > >>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> > > > > > >>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > > > > > >>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good shape and
> > > > > > >> want
> > > > > > >>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to 1.36.0,
> > > > > > >> this
> > > > > > >>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best to get
> > > > it
> > > > > > >> in.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's introduced by
> > > > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check whether it
> > > > is a
> > > > > > >>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> > > > > > >>>>>> [2]
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > > > >>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > > > > > >>>>>> [4]
> > > > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > > > > > >>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > > > >>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Best,
> > > > > > >>>>>> Benchao Li
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Best,
> > > > > > >>>> Benchao Li
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> --
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Best,
> > > > > > >>> Benchao Li
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Benchao Li
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Benchao Li
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best,
> > Benchao Li
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> Benchao Li
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>.
Hi devs,
All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll start the
release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze until
further notice.
Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道：
>
> @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it and
> start the releasing process?
>
> LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
> >
> > Hi Itiel,
> >
> > I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and left one
> > comments
> >
> > Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> >
> > > Mihai,
> > > I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in 1.36.0
> > >
> > > Itiel,
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and even
> > > with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it merged
> > > in 1.36.0
> > >
> > > Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> > > >
> > > > 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> > > > I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> > > > But we can leave it for later.
> > > >
> > > > Mihai
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > > > To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > > >
> > > > Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and CALCITE-4455,
> > > > I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll start
> > > > the release process after they are merged.
> > > >
> > > > Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The expected release time at the end of the month seems to be coming
> > > soon.
> > > > > > I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days (almost
> > > ready):
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Ran Tao
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六 13:34写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi, all:
> > > > > >> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues has been
> > > someone
> > > > > >> reviewed.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> > > > > >> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> > > > > >> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> > > > > >> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they should
> > > be
> > > > > >> resolved soon.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at the PR.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
> > > collectively
> > > > > >>> fix them.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but does not
> > > include
> > > > > >>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well for the
> > > tests
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but should be
> > > > > >> amended
> > > > > >>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Mihai
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> ________________________________
> > > > > >>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > > > > >>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted 1.36.0
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of October is
> > > > > >>> approaching.
> > > > > >>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues in #1.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to be
> > > merged
> > > > > >>> shortly
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> #4. blocker issues status
> > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is marked
> > > blocked
> > > > > >>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921 now.
> > > > > >>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more thorough
> > > solution.
> > > > > >>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Hi, community.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that calcite's MAP
> > > > > >>> SubQuery
> > > > > >>>>> doesn't work,
> > > > > >>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe we can
> > > fix it
> > > > > >> in
> > > > > >>>>> 1.36.
> > > > > >>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review it. many
> > > > > >>> thanks.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Best Regards,
> > > > > >>>>> Ran Tao
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last release [1]
> > > and
> > > > > >>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and Github [3],
> > > there
> > > > > >>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of the
> > > release.
> > > > > >>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean up our
> > > 1.36
> > > > > >>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd
> > > propose to
> > > > > >>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will give us
> > > > > >> about
> > > > > >>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What do you
> > > > > >> think?
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would be:
> > > > > >>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> > > > > >>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > > > > >>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good shape and
> > > > > >> want
> > > > > >>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to 1.36.0,
> > > > > >> this
> > > > > >>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best to get
> > > it
> > > > > >> in.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's introduced by
> > > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check whether it
> > > is a
> > > > > >>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> > > > > >>>>>> [2]
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > > >>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > > > > >>>>>> [4]
> > > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > > > > >>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > > >>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Best,
> > > > > >>>>>> Benchao Li
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Best,
> > > > > >>>> Benchao Li
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Best,
> > > > > >>> Benchao Li
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Benchao Li
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Benchao Li
> > >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> Benchao Li
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>.
@Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it and
start the releasing process?
LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
>
> Hi Itiel,
>
> I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and left one
> comments
>
> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
>
> > Mihai,
> > I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in 1.36.0
> >
> > Itiel,
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and even
> > with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it merged
> > in 1.36.0
> >
> > Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> > >
> > > 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> > > I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> > > But we can leave it for later.
> > >
> > > Mihai
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > > To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >
> > > Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and CALCITE-4455,
> > > I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
> > >
> > > Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll start
> > > the release process after they are merged.
> > >
> > > Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> > > >
> > > > I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> > > >
> > > > > On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The expected release time at the end of the month seems to be coming
> > soon.
> > > > > I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> > > > >
> > > > > #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days (almost
> > ready):
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > >
> > > > > #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > >
> > > > > #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Ran Tao
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六 13:34写道：
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi, all:
> > > > >> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues has been
> > someone
> > > > >> reviewed.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> > > > >> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> > > > >> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> > > > >> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they should
> > be
> > > > >> resolved soon.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > >>
> > > > >> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > >>
> > > > >> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > > > >>
> > > > >> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at the PR.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
> > collectively
> > > > >>> fix them.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but does not
> > include
> > > > >>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well for the
> > tests
> > > > >> to
> > > > >>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but should be
> > > > >> amended
> > > > >>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Mihai
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> ________________________________
> > > > >>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > > > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > > > >>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted 1.36.0
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of October is
> > > > >>> approaching.
> > > > >>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues in #1.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to be
> > merged
> > > > >>> shortly
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> #4. blocker issues status
> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is marked
> > blocked
> > > > >>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921 now.
> > > > >>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more thorough
> > solution.
> > > > >>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Hi, community.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that calcite's MAP
> > > > >>> SubQuery
> > > > >>>>> doesn't work,
> > > > >>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe we can
> > fix it
> > > > >> in
> > > > >>>>> 1.36.
> > > > >>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review it. many
> > > > >>> thanks.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Best Regards,
> > > > >>>>> Ran Tao
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last release [1]
> > and
> > > > >>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and Github [3],
> > there
> > > > >>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of the
> > release.
> > > > >>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean up our
> > 1.36
> > > > >>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd
> > propose to
> > > > >>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will give us
> > > > >> about
> > > > >>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What do you
> > > > >> think?
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would be:
> > > > >>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> > > > >>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > > > >>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good shape and
> > > > >> want
> > > > >>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to 1.36.0,
> > > > >> this
> > > > >>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best to get
> > it
> > > > >> in.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's introduced by
> > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check whether it
> > is a
> > > > >>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> > > > >>>>>> [2]
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > >>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > > > >>>>>> [4]
> > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > > > >>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > >>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Best,
> > > > >>>>>> Benchao Li
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Best,
> > > > >>>> Benchao Li
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Best,
> > > > >>> Benchao Li
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Benchao Li
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best,
> > Benchao Li
> >
--
Best,
Benchao Li
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Posted by LakeShen <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Itiel,
I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and left one
comments
Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
> Mihai,
> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in 1.36.0
>
> Itiel,
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and even
> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it merged
> in 1.36.0
>
> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> >
> > 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> > I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> > But we can leave it for later.
> >
> > Mihai
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >
> > Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and CALCITE-4455,
> > I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think?
> >
> > Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll start
> > the release process after they are merged.
> >
> > Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道：
> > >
> > > I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left.
> > >
> > > > On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The expected release time at the end of the month seems to be coming
> soon.
> > > > I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> > > >
> > > > #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days (almost
> ready):
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > >
> > > > #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > >
> > > > #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Ran Tao
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jiajun Xie <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六 13:34写道：
> > > >
> > > >> Hi, all:
> > > >> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues has been
> someone
> > > >> reviewed.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> - Some issues are currently being reviewed.
> > > >> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts.
> > > >> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time.
> > > >> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they should
> be
> > > >> resolved soon.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days:
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > >>
> > > >> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > >>
> > > >> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > > >>
> > > >> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at the PR.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Mihai Budiu <mb...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
> collectively
> > > >>> fix them.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but does not
> include
> > > >>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well for the
> tests
> > > >> to
> > > >>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but should be
> > > >> amended
> > > >>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Mihai
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> ________________________________
> > > >>>> From: Benchao Li <li...@apache.org>
> > > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > > >>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted 1.36.0
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of October is
> > > >>> approaching.
> > > >>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues in #1.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to be
> merged
> > > >>> shortly
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> #4. blocker issues status
> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is marked
> blocked
> > > >>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921 now.
> > > >>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more thorough
> solution.
> > > >>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Ran Tao <ch...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道：
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi, community.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that calcite's MAP
> > > >>> SubQuery
> > > >>>>> doesn't work,
> > > >>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe we can
> fix it
> > > >> in
> > > >>>>> 1.36.
> > > >>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review it. many
> > > >>> thanks.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Best Regards,
> > > >>>>> Ran Tao
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Benchao Li <li...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last release [1]
> and
> > > >>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and Github [3],
> there
> > > >>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of the
> release.
> > > >>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean up our
> 1.36
> > > >>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd
> propose to
> > > >>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will give us
> > > >> about
> > > >>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What do you
> > > >> think?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would be:
> > > >>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li
> > > >>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > > >>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good shape and
> > > >> want
> > > >>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to 1.36.0,
> > > >> this
> > > >>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best to get
> it
> > > >> in.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's introduced by
> > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check whether it
> is a
> > > >>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0
> > > >>>>>> [2]
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > >>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > > >>>>>> [4]
> > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > > >>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
> > > >>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>> Benchao Li
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best,
> > > >>>> Benchao Li
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Benchao Li
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best,
> > Benchao Li
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> Benchao Li
>