You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Isan Fulia <is...@germinait.com> on 2011/05/04 07:30:18 UTC
Using lowercase as field type
Hi ,
My schema consists of a field of type lowercase(for applying the lowercase
filter factory) and is the unique key . But its no longer behaving as
unique key. Multiple documents with same value for the unique key are
getting indexed.
Does anyone know why this is happening or is it that the field of type
lowercase cannot be unique key.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
Re: Using lowercase as field type
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
OK, what is your proof that they're not overwriting? Because the
deleted documents are still in the index, and looking at, say,
terms will show them until an optimize is done.
The deleted copies won't be shown in search results etc, but
the underlying data is still in the index.
If that's not the problem, let's see your schema definitions for the
field in question, and what you're seeing that you believe shows
the documents not being overwritten.
You might review this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Isan Fulia <is...@germinait.com> wrote:
> I want multiple documents with same unique key to overwrite each other but
> they are not overwriting because of lowercase field type as unique key
>
> On 4 May 2011 11:45, Markus Jelsma <ma...@openindex.io> wrote:
>
>> So those multiple documents overwrite eachother? In that case, your data is
>> not suited for a lowercased docID. I'd recommend not doing any analysis on
>> the
>> docID to prevent such headaches.
>>
>> > Hi ,
>> >
>> > My schema consists of a field of type lowercase(for applying the
>> lowercase
>> > filter factory) and is the unique key . But its no longer behaving as
>> > unique key. Multiple documents with same value for the unique key are
>> > getting indexed.
>> > Does anyone know why this is happening or is it that the field of type
>> > lowercase cannot be unique key.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Isan Fulia.
>
Re: Using lowercase as field type
Posted by Isan Fulia <is...@germinait.com>.
I want multiple documents with same unique key to overwrite each other but
they are not overwriting because of lowercase field type as unique key
On 4 May 2011 11:45, Markus Jelsma <ma...@openindex.io> wrote:
> So those multiple documents overwrite eachother? In that case, your data is
> not suited for a lowercased docID. I'd recommend not doing any analysis on
> the
> docID to prevent such headaches.
>
> > Hi ,
> >
> > My schema consists of a field of type lowercase(for applying the
> lowercase
> > filter factory) and is the unique key . But its no longer behaving as
> > unique key. Multiple documents with same value for the unique key are
> > getting indexed.
> > Does anyone know why this is happening or is it that the field of type
> > lowercase cannot be unique key.
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
Re: Using lowercase as field type
Posted by Markus Jelsma <ma...@openindex.io>.
So those multiple documents overwrite eachother? In that case, your data is
not suited for a lowercased docID. I'd recommend not doing any analysis on the
docID to prevent such headaches.
> Hi ,
>
> My schema consists of a field of type lowercase(for applying the lowercase
> filter factory) and is the unique key . But its no longer behaving as
> unique key. Multiple documents with same value for the unique key are
> getting indexed.
> Does anyone know why this is happening or is it that the field of type
> lowercase cannot be unique key.