You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@cassandra.apache.org by aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com> on 2011/06/20 01:06:51 UTC

Re: Error trying to move a node - 0.7

I *think* someone had a similar problem once before, moving a node that was the only node in a DC. 

Whats version are you using ?

-----------------
Aaron Morton
Freelance Cassandra Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com

On 17 Jun 2011, at 07:42, Ben Frank wrote:

> Hi All,
>   I'm getting the following error when trying to move a nodes token:
> 
> nodetool -h 145.6.92.82 -p 18080 move 56713727820156410577229101238628035242
> cassandra.in.sh executing for environment DEV1
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.AssertionError
>        at
> org.apache.cassandra.locator.TokenMetadata.firstTokenIndex(TokenMetadata.java:393)
>        at
> org.apache.cassandra.locator.TokenMetadata.ringIterator(TokenMetadata.java:418)
>        at
> org.apache.cassandra.locator.NetworkTopologyStrategy.calculateNaturalEndpoints(NetworkTopologyStrategy.java:94)
>        at
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.calculatePendingRanges(StorageService.java:807)
>        at
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.calculatePendingRanges(StorageService.java:773)
>        at
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.startLeaving(StorageService.java:1468)
>        at
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.move(StorageService.java:1605)
>        at
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.move(StorageService.java:1580)
> .
> .
> .
> 
> my ring looks like this:
> 
> Address         Status State   Load            Owns    Token
> 
> 113427455640312821154458202477256070484
> 145.6.99.80      Up     Normal  1.63 GB         36.05%
> 4629135223504085509237477504287125589
> 145.6.92.82      Up     Normal  2.86 GB         1.09%
> 6479163079760931522618457053473150444
> 145.6.99.81      Up     Normal  2.01 GB         62.86%
> 113427455640312821154458202477256070484
> 
> 
> '80' and '81' are configured to be in the East coast data center and '82' is
> in the West
> 
> Anyone shed any light as to what might be going on here?
> 
> -Ben


Re: Query indexed column with key filter‏

Posted by aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com>.
Currently these are two different types of query, using a key range is equivalent to the get_range_slices() API function and column clauses is a get_indexed_slices() call. So you would be asking for a potentially painful join between.

Creating a column with the same value as the key sounds reasonable. 

Cheers
 
-----------------
Aaron Morton
Freelance Cassandra Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com

On 29 Jun 2011, at 05:31, Daning wrote:

> I found this code
> 
>        // Start and finish keys, *and* column relations (KEY>  foo AND KEY<  bar and name1 = value1).
>        if (select.isKeyRange()&&  (select.getKeyFinish() != null)&&  (select.getColumnRelations().size()>  0))
>            throw new InvalidRequestException("You cannot combine key range and by-column clauses in a SELECT");
> 
> in
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/cql/QueryProcessor.java
> 
> 
> This operation is exactly what I want - query by column then filter by key. I want to know why this query is not supported, and what's the good work around for it? At this moment my workaound is to create a column which is exactly same as key.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daning


Query indexed column with key filter‏

Posted by Daning <da...@netseer.com>.
I found this code

         // Start and finish keys, *and* column relations (KEY>  foo AND KEY<  bar and name1 = value1).
         if (select.isKeyRange()&&  (select.getKeyFinish() != null)&&  (select.getColumnRelations().size()>  0))
             throw new InvalidRequestException("You cannot combine key range and by-column clauses in a SELECT");

in

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/cql/QueryProcessor.java


This operation is exactly what I want - query by column then filter by 
key. I want to know why this query is not supported, and what's the good 
work around for it? At this moment my workaound is to create a column 
which is exactly same as key.

Thanks,

Daning

Re: Error trying to move a node - 0.7

Posted by Ben Frank <be...@airlust.com>.
Hey Aaron,
   I think you're right, I'm using version 0.7 and indeed the node I'm
trying to move is the only node in that data center - I'll steal some
hardware to add to the ring to confirm.

-Ben

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:06 PM, aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com>wrote:

> I *think* someone had a similar problem once before, moving a node that was
> the only node in a DC.
>
> Whats version are you using ?
>
> -----------------
> Aaron Morton
> Freelance Cassandra Developer
> @aaronmorton
> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>
> On 17 Jun 2011, at 07:42, Ben Frank wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >   I'm getting the following error when trying to move a nodes token:
> >
> > nodetool -h 145.6.92.82 -p 18080 move
> 56713727820156410577229101238628035242
> > cassandra.in.sh executing for environment DEV1
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.AssertionError
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.cassandra.locator.TokenMetadata.firstTokenIndex(TokenMetadata.java:393)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.cassandra.locator.TokenMetadata.ringIterator(TokenMetadata.java:418)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.cassandra.locator.NetworkTopologyStrategy.calculateNaturalEndpoints(NetworkTopologyStrategy.java:94)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.calculatePendingRanges(StorageService.java:807)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.calculatePendingRanges(StorageService.java:773)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.startLeaving(StorageService.java:1468)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.move(StorageService.java:1605)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.move(StorageService.java:1580)
> > .
> > .
> > .
> >
> > my ring looks like this:
> >
> > Address         Status State   Load            Owns    Token
> >
> > 113427455640312821154458202477256070484
> > 145.6.99.80      Up     Normal  1.63 GB         36.05%
> > 4629135223504085509237477504287125589
> > 145.6.92.82      Up     Normal  2.86 GB         1.09%
> > 6479163079760931522618457053473150444
> > 145.6.99.81      Up     Normal  2.01 GB         62.86%
> > 113427455640312821154458202477256070484
> >
> >
> > '80' and '81' are configured to be in the East coast data center and '82'
> is
> > in the West
> >
> > Anyone shed any light as to what might be going on here?
> >
> > -Ben
>
>