You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Brandon Ehle <az...@yahoo.com> on 2002/11/21 21:35:16 UTC
Windows Projects
How do we want to handle the libsvn_ stuff to compile as static or
dynamic libraries when auto-generating makefiles?
1) Dynamic by default, Static if you regen the makefiles
2) Static by default, Dynamic if you regen the makefiles
3) Both versions in the same project file (e.x. libsvn_fs is dynamic,
static_libsvn_fs would be static)
4) Dynamic libraries, but also make one giant static library
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Windows Projects
Posted by Brandon Ehle <az...@yahoo.com>.
Brandon Ehle wrote:
> How do we want to handle the libsvn_ stuff to compile as static or
> dynamic libraries when auto-generating makefiles?
>
> 1) Dynamic by default, Static if you regen the makefiles
> 2) Static by default, Dynamic if you regen the makefiles
> 3) Both versions in the same project file (e.x. libsvn_fs is dynamic,
> static_libsvn_fs would be static)
> 4) Dynamic libraries, but also make one giant static library
Err, that's for both Windows makefiles AND Projects if anyone was wondering.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org