You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shiro.apache.org by "Benjamin Marwell (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/08/18 15:06:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SHIRO-629) WildcardPermission syntax

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17401129#comment-17401129 ] 

Benjamin Marwell commented on SHIRO-629:
----------------------------------------

Hi [~pkriens], thanks for reporting. While browsing, I decided to take a deeper look into this for Shiro 2.x.

For 1.x, the best bet is to stick to ASCII characters for now.

> WildcardPermission syntax
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: SHIRO-629
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-629
>             Project: Shiro
>          Issue Type: Question
>          Components: Authorization (access control) 
>            Reporter: Peter Kriens
>            Priority: Critical
>
> While looking at the WildcardPermission I see it allows a much wider range of usage then used in all the examples I've seen. Looking at the implementation I notice it is not verifying. I also noted that there is no escaping for matching the [*:,] tokens in the target permission. I think the examples follow the grammar like:
>       permission ::= part ( ':' part ) *
>       part            ::= wildcard | options
>       wildcard     ::= '*'
>       options      ::= literal ( ',' literal )
>       literal         ::= [^*:,]+
> This should disallow permissions like "abc*def", "abc:def,*:foo", "abc:", "x:::::::::::::::". However, the implementation seems to more or less allow anything without warnings or errors. Is this intentional?
> Last, the implementation looks quite expensive since it requires for each construction numerous lists, sets, and arrays. It also executes n*m a regular expression operations for the split. Since the target permission could be constructed frequently since it contains the parameters this is imho very costly. 
> Therefore it would be nice if a formal grammar including the character set and escaping.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)