You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> on 2008/10/07 16:53:44 UTC
Re: svn commit: r702443 - in /cxf/branches/2.1.x-fixes: ./ api/ api/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/jca/ api/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/jca/outbound/ distribution/src/main/release/samples/integration/jca/outbound.was61/ distribution/src/main/release/samples...
Quick question:
On Tuesday 07 October 2008, ningjiang@apache.org wrote:
> Modified: cxf/branches/2.1.x-fixes/api/pom.xml
> <dependency>
> + <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
> + <artifactId>geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec</artifactId>
> + </dependency>
Could this have <scope>provided</scope> so we don't ship this and have it
added to the class path and such? Your J2EE container should already
provide that so we shouldn't need to ship it.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: svn commit: r702443 - in /cxf/branches/2.1.x-fixes: ./ api/ api/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/jca/
api/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/jca/outbound/ distribution/src/main/release/samples/integration/jca/outbound.was61/
distribution/src/main/release/samples...
Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
Yes, we should not ship this jar, I will fix it in my next commit.
Thanks,
Willem
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Quick question:
>
> On Tuesday 07 October 2008, ningjiang@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Modified: cxf/branches/2.1.x-fixes/api/pom.xml
>> <dependency>
>> + <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
>> + <artifactId>geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec</artifactId>
>> + </dependency>
>>
>
> Could this have <scope>provided</scope> so we don't ship this and have it
> added to the class path and such? Your J2EE container should already
> provide that so we shouldn't need to ship it.
>
>
>